|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:09 PM Original message |
Appz 2 Alienate Ur Female Customerz? Pepsi Haz It • • • |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:10 PM Response to Original message |
1. And this is any different from how men are portrayed in Cosmo, or Marie Claire, or... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:38 PM Response to Reply #1 |
12. Example? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:55 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. You know what I'm getting at.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #16 |
19. I don't read those magazines. Really no idea what you're referring to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:03 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. Then go read a few, thats all it will take. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. LOL... not a chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:08 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. I didn't, I find them to be sexist and full of misandry and deceitful behavior. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:15 PM Response to Reply #26 |
31. Why not just give an example then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #31 |
32. i dont read them either. so i dont know. just a bunch of conditioning to create a society |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #32 |
40. Fashion tips I won't follow... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #40 |
43. except pepsi is a co. selling to two genders. the promote something to entice one gender, repels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:44 PM Response to Reply #43 |
76. repels or |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neecy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #76 |
90. or fail miserably |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #31 |
35. You want to debate on a subject that you admittedly know nothing about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. Um no... I want to know if it's really comparable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:24 PM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Why are you being so obtuse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:26 PM Response to Reply #44 |
45. are they wanting $ from both male and females.... or is it for female $? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #45 |
95. To pepsi, it makes no difference. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #44 |
47. You don't even know what's in the magazines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:39 PM Response to Reply #47 |
97. You have contradicted yourself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. I know what's in them... I don't see an analogy to the Pepsi thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #99 |
105. My last attempt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:54 PM Response to Reply #105 |
112. Sorta... where's the "anger and outrage"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. It was my take upon reading the story in the OP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:02 PM Response to Reply #114 |
117. "Alienate" is far from "anger," let alone "outrage." (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #117 |
119. OK, I can agree with that. Do you see my point though? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:08 PM Response to Reply #119 |
121. Yep. There is stupid sexist crap aimed at both sides... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #121 |
125. It was Carls, Jr. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:10 PM Response to Reply #119 |
123. i dont see the point because, these mag are not out for male $. they are to grab female $ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #123 |
127. But this one ad (the iPhone app) is targeted at one demographic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:08 PM Response to Reply #127 |
157. What products? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:16 PM Response to Reply #123 |
128. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #128 |
129. still not the same. pepsi ad in a cosmo isnt the same as pepsi in cosmo dissing male. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:19 PM Response to Reply #129 |
130. But it is IN a magazine full of sexism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. i am sorry. i know you want it to fit. but doesnt. not the same. pepsi is a co. for all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #133 |
139. Look at it another way.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:39 PM Response to Reply #130 |
145. advertisers control the content of many women's magazines.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #145 |
149. That's a big load of bullshit. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 08:47 PM Response to Reply #149 |
177. you are obviously in need of education |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 09:10 PM Response to Reply #177 |
180. Ummm... reserving complementary space is a far, far cry... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 08:03 PM Response to Reply #180 |
207. you didn't even read the articles, did you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 08:23 PM Response to Reply #207 |
209. I think I know better about what goes on one floor below me than you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-14-09 10:52 AM Response to Reply #209 |
211. because Ms. was ADVERTISING FREE ... so they didn't have to kow tow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #105 |
147. So, because a few women read X in a magazine NO women may express outrage at Pepsi Co. for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:05 PM Response to Reply #105 |
156. It's not the "same," it's not "the same sexism" and it's not the same medium at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:13 PM Response to Reply #156 |
159. I haven't even seen him provide a single example of sexism to begin any real debate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:54 PM Response to Reply #159 |
168. Please see this response: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 07:14 PM Response to Reply #168 |
173. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:46 PM Response to Reply #44 |
77. Your replies are perhaps |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:40 PM Response to Reply #77 |
98. One needs only to look at the long history of YOUR posts to know where YOU come from. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:46 PM Response to Reply #98 |
150. Wank wank. You arent' saying anything and you're playing games |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:48 PM Response to Reply #77 |
103. Lots of people would rather win a point rather than be correct... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:47 PM Response to Reply #103 |
151. Understood. Though he isn't making any arguments at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 08:45 PM Response to Reply #151 |
176. And just what are YOU doing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 12:40 AM Response to Reply #176 |
181. After a time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 11:44 AM Response to Reply #181 |
187. NO, not playing games. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #187 |
189. Which you never actually stated or showed clearly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #189 |
190. wah! you women aren't really interested in equality unless you put men first!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 01:58 PM Response to Reply #190 |
191. when you talk about inequality of women, it's a put down of ALL men, especially widdle me WAH!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 03:31 PM Response to Reply #191 |
195. That makes no sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #195 |
197. Sure doesn't. But that's the attitude of SOME men and it shuts down/hijacks discussions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #189 |
194. I think misandry IS the correct term. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #194 |
198. You're the one who said it about the magazines. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
existentialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #38 |
53. The MO you're describing is par for the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #53 |
62. Oh yes, I definitely agree that they're crap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:50 PM Response to Reply #53 |
78. "Although I will agree that the women's mags he cites are generally crap." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:43 PM Response to Reply #38 |
100. How can I say ot MORE plainly for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. LOL... you already replied to that post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-14-09 04:18 PM Response to Reply #38 |
213. This might be what you're looking for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #35 |
86. Well, you could enlighten us instead of complaining but you've already |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:15 PM Response to Reply #86 |
160. Perhaps a disclaimer in his sigline, like his view on certain women's magazines: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:42 PM Response to Reply #31 |
75. oh goodness |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hfojvt (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:24 PM Response to Reply #26 |
136. I am not seeing this from Cosmo online |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
33. That was pretty weak. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:19 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. My examples are the mags themsleves. If one has not ever read one, any example I give would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:22 PM Response to Reply #36 |
41. or the point. we are talking about the sexism in this country/co. and you bring up magazines |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:18 PM Response to Reply #41 |
82. No I think it is a direct comparison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:29 PM Response to Reply #82 |
91. It's not the same. The women's magazines would be on par with the men's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:33 PM Response to Reply #91 |
92. Each of those mags markets directly to a target audience. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:36 PM Response to Reply #92 |
96. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:35 PM Response to Reply #91 |
94. ... "such as it is," indeed. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:24 PM Response to Reply #82 |
163. You're wrong. If you think it is a direct comparison, you have not said anything but you "think it" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:26 PM Response to Reply #82 |
164. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:23 PM Response to Reply #36 |
42. If that was your comparison, then your attempt at an analogy failed. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. Nah, its just a failure on your part to grasp what I am saying. Or willfull ignorance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:36 PM Response to Reply #48 |
52. Nope. Not even close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:21 PM Response to Reply #52 |
84. I guess that that person would not be you, as you have failed to back up a single thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:33 PM Response to Reply #84 |
143. gee, in post #48 you said you were done here ... trying to get the last word? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:42 PM Response to Reply #143 |
148. Nah, he's trying to understand and be understood. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:35 PM Response to Reply #143 |
165. And post #105, so far. Keeps promisng to leave, still refusing to cite any examples, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 03:37 PM Response to Reply #165 |
196. For the last time... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:13 PM Response to Reply #196 |
200. the fact that you lumped Ms in with those others PROVES beyond any shadow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #200 |
201. Whatever...you are being willfully obtuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #201 |
203. what you dont get, what you dont consider, and it is lack of knowledge cause you dont |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 08:07 PM Response to Reply #203 |
208. and to be so ignorant as to lump in "Ms." with those stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #200 |
202. some think oprah is/cause/creates manhaters too. rw knuckledraggers scared to death |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:52 PM Response to Reply #48 |
79. You're not saying anything. And you're completely transparent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
83. Deleted message |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #79 |
132. Wow, you got my message deleted? Truth must hurt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:49 PM Response to Reply #132 |
152. Don't know what you're talking about. Must have been a vile post on your part, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 08:57 PM Response to Reply #132 |
178. nooooo, YOU got your post deleted by breaking the rules duh n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:27 PM Response to Reply #36 |
46. Well, it has been over a decade since I have even opened a Cosmo mag in the grocery store line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:29 PM Response to Reply #46 |
49. OK, thanks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:45 PM Response to Reply #46 |
57. Very true. Which is why I will never |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:48 PM Response to Reply #36 |
60. Look, two wrongs don't make a right. Just because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:54 PM Response to Reply #60 |
80. There's no there there. He hasn't actually said anything at all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:25 PM Response to Reply #80 |
87. And the only thing you have said are insults. WHO are YOU try cry foul when you ARE foul? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:50 PM Response to Reply #87 |
153. You are FOS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-14-09 03:58 PM Response to Reply #153 |
212. I guess you recognize your own kind..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:23 PM Response to Reply #60 |
85. Nope, just trying to point out the hypocrisy of the poutrage from this pepsi thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #85 |
110. well but you do. the one time on du we even had anything remotely sexist toward men, women were |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:02 PM Response to Reply #110 |
155. That is one area where it seems women have it over men. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:50 PM Response to Reply #36 |
107. Cosmo incites female readers to marginalize and control the male? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:51 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. UH, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:04 PM Response to Reply #108 |
118. Uh, NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:09 PM Response to Reply #118 |
122. Really? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:12 PM Response to Reply #122 |
124. oh... now see. one of my biggest bitches with females. using sex to get and manipulate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:15 PM Response to Reply #124 |
126. And that shit does seem to be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:20 PM Response to Reply #126 |
131. but this is the breakdown between the two genders today. promoting both. hurts both |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:21 PM Response to Reply #124 |
134. Really? You agree now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:23 PM Response to Reply #134 |
135. i get more mad at females that do this than males that objectify. pisses me off big |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:27 PM Response to Reply #135 |
140. I don't mind it, as long as they're honest... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:37 PM Response to Reply #140 |
144. ok, ... if they are emotionally wrapped up, then it is using. and i am never into that. this for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:41 PM Response to Reply #144 |
146. Yes, that's an important distinction. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:25 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. and it isnt NOW. it has always been. you just never mentioned this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 09:01 PM Response to Reply #124 |
179. poor boys, those evil women make them lose control of their penis n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raineyb (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:26 PM Response to Reply #122 |
138. By conforming to a rather narrow definition of femininity. One that apparently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:28 PM Response to Reply #138 |
141. "s the assumption that only men can handle the technology that is the iphone?" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:29 PM Response to Reply #138 |
142. I make no assumption like that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 06:15 PM Response to Reply #138 |
171. The app is targeted at males. Just like a mag dedicated to male interests would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:10 PM Response to Reply #122 |
158. I think you apply literalism to mere metaphor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:53 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. good point, lol. maybe that is why i havent picked one up in a couple decades, lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #33 |
56. Don't bother. This particular poster can't be bothered, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:26 PM Response to Reply #56 |
88. What is with the "he provides no examples" BS? I HAVE provided examples. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:47 PM Response to Reply #88 |
102. "the magazines themselves" is a total shotgun fallacy fail. You have provided nothing. The burden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:07 PM Response to Reply #102 |
120. I dont know how to be any clearer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:57 PM Response to Reply #120 |
154. Such limitations must present quite a challenge to you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:16 PM Response to Reply #120 |
161. Cite specific articles from within the magazine itself |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:09 PM Response to Reply #1 |
27. so you don't know what you're talking about here then? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Apparently, you are the one that doesn't know what I'm talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Quantess (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:18 PM Response to Reply #28 |
34. I have no idea, either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:20 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Thats a good thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:49 PM Response to Reply #37 |
104. It would appear to be very light reading at best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:01 PM Response to Reply #104 |
116. I guess for you it would be, since you have been able to add SO MUCH to this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maru Kitteh (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 07:10 PM Response to Reply #116 |
172. No. The greater balance consist of questions you are not willing or capable of answering, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
existentialist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #1 |
50. Leave it to you to defend this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:39 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. bah hahahah |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalhistorian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. I know, I feel really stupid! I didn't know he'd been on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
89. I'm not defending anything! Just pointing out the hypocrisy of the poutrage, thats all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
59. Yes, you're right. Absolutely the same schlock! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #59 |
67. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
71. Well you figure out the first part b/c that's a stupid question and the interactivity is the other |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hughee99 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 06:03 PM Response to Reply #1 |
169. You mean just because any article on men could be labeled |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fasttense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
2. So, do women "score" too? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoPasaran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:21 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. The East German judge gave this one a three |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:24 PM Response to Original message |
4. Women don't need something like this. Men are easy and simple. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:31 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Perhaps you should get to know some actual people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
20. And porn. Your forgot porn. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 01:07 AM Response to Reply #6 |
182. I'm a man(of sorts) and I think he's right on,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hello_Kitty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #182 |
192. Must make your life easy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Regret My New Name (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:52 PM Response to Reply #192 |
204. Just men... I find many women to be very complex and difficult to figure out... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fridays Child (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Ha! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
5. Actually, I'm not offended by this--it's kinda flattering how men work at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. "work at impressing"? Reading lines is working? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #7 |
64. If I were still on the dating circuit, I'd hold up a glass of water |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 09:04 AM Response to Reply #7 |
183. The point I'm making is that some guys think there's a "formula" that will work. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:55 PM Response to Reply #183 |
205. It seems to me that's the opposite of "working"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:34 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I think it illustrates their issues with ego and insecurity as men. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. absolutely. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:56 PM Response to Reply #5 |
81. Assessing, not "impressing." Competing for sport (or product?) with prepackaged "lines" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
11. If you go to the app page in iTunes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:42 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Pffft! Oh, that's pathetic! LOL! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:52 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I know right? You can usually spot it too: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:54 PM Response to Reply #14 |
15. cant wait to try this out on some chicks. that alone is loser material, should never get a "chick" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 12:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. I don't know, it'd be pretty pathetic if someone actually used this app |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. i dont know women that go fro any "line" per se. either like a guy or not, but a line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NYC Liberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:04 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Never met any myself but then .. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:13 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. so, you never knew a female to go for line. i am a female, dont go for line, know no female |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
74. I don't think it's meant to be taken seriously, even by the target market. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stargazer09 (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 07:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
174. Oh brother! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ian David (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
21. WHO would buy such a thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
25. And whats with the abbreviated and misspelled texting lingo? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:11 PM Response to Reply #25 |
29. It's great for annoying language purists, though. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rd_kent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:21 PM Response to Reply #29 |
39. You are right, it is annoying to see people WILLFULLY make themselves look ignorant. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:33 PM Response to Reply #39 |
51. Imminent death of the English language predicted! (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:39 PM Response to Original message |
54. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:46 PM Response to Original message |
58. Why so serious? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kalyke (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:07 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. It violates women because it assumes women are only here for men |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:10 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. touchdown! score! spike ball.... raise arms, boo yah. ya, complimentary. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:15 PM Response to Reply #65 |
68. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:17 PM Response to Reply #68 |
69. yes. you are right on. and for the insensitivity and making a buck off it, they can lose the buck |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:53 PM Response to Reply #68 |
167. its sxst |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sinti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 09:51 AM Response to Reply #167 |
184. You caught me :) but sexist is so vague |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Boojatta (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:46 PM Response to Reply #65 |
101. This was explained long ago by General Ripper |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:48 PM Response to Reply #58 |
166. It programs the boys and it objectifies (dehumanizes) women |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
damntexdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
61. I just saw 'The Invention of Lying.' Great soda commercials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
70. Programming customers to be sexist bigot idiots, hooked on the product, data mined and wasting $$$ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
72. Last week, drink all the Pepsi you can and this week boycott it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 02:38 PM Response to Reply #72 |
73. last week, embrace the gays, this week, fuck the females. maybe pepsi |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jim__ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
93. The worst part of the ad is the presumption ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:57 PM Response to Reply #93 |
113. hoooorah to your post. i have been waiting for a long time for a male to be offended being treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sentelle (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
109. LOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 04:00 PM Response to Reply #109 |
115. Heh... you made me think of this: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 05:21 PM Response to Reply #109 |
162. They aren't called energy drinks for the sugar and nurients. It's for the caffeine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sentelle (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 06:07 PM Response to Reply #162 |
170. They certainly aren't called 'tasty' drinks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Oct-12-09 07:55 PM Response to Reply #170 |
175. Hah! :-D |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sentelle (659 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 10:18 AM Response to Reply #175 |
185. The thing was |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #185 |
186. see. you got it. that is all it is. not a hard one. obvious. and right on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gwendolyn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 12:03 PM Response to Reply #185 |
188. Of course it's silly. It's supposed to be. It's a joke campaign. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ismnotwasm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
193. Stupid |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
omega minimo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:06 PM Response to Reply #193 |
199. Spot. On. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
redqueen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 04:59 PM Response to Reply #193 |
206. Hear fucking hear. SO tired of the people who bend over backwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MellowDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Oct-13-09 08:35 PM Response to Original message |
210. I really don't see... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC