Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dem Rep. Accuses GOP of Sexism over Pelosi Jab

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:19 PM
Original message
Dem Rep. Accuses GOP of Sexism over Pelosi Jab
Source: CBS News

<snip>

On a Monday night appearance on the Charlie Rose Show, Pelosi said McChrystal, the top commander in Afghanistan, should not have laid out his opinions on the war in a speech in London.

"Let me say this about General McChrystal, with all due respect," she said. "His recommendations to the president should go up the line of command. It shouldn't be in press conferences...The fact is I think that that's not where this debate takes place."

Following that interview, the NRCC released a statement mocking the speaker as "General Pelosi."

"Rather than listening to a four-star general's assessments on Afghanistan, General Pelosi somehow believes she is better suited to craft our country's military policy," NRCC Communications Director Ken Spain was quoted as saying. The statement continued to read, "If Nancy Pelosi's failed economic policies are any indicator of the effect she may have on Afghanistan, taxpayers can only hope McChrystal is able to put her in her place."

Wasserman Schultz questioned the nature of the NRCC's comments.

"I think the place for a woman is at the top of the House of Representatives," she told Politico. "It's evidence they long for the days when a woman's place was in the kitchen. Now a woman is third in line for the presidency... But it's not surprising, coming from a party that's 80 percent male and 100 percent white," which is the makeup of the House GOP conference.



Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/10/07/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5368788.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. The NRCC has lost its collective mind. "Nancy Pelosi's failed economic policies"? When was she a
Republican urging deregulation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Since when has she been in charge for anything?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
derby378 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not necessarily sexist, but definitely condescending
The military take their ultimate orders from a civilian. And that civilian, in theory, cannot act unilaterally without support from elected assemblies of civilians - with Nancy Pelosi heading up one of those assemblies.

I don't have a history of supporting Pelosi's actions in the past, but she's improving. And she's dead on in this regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #2
19. Not necessarily sexist? White male Congress critters have always spoken of
putting those who are second in line for the Presidency in their place?

Guess I missed it.

Wonder what the place for someone seccond in line for the Presidency would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why is Rep. Wasserman Test responding to this. She has become the darling of the airwaves
because she is a DLC shill. She's the one who defended the Republican yahoos Ros-Lehtinen and the Diaz-Balarts from having any meaningful opposition during the recent elections.

We need some high-profile progressives speaking for the Democratic Party. Why don't they ask Rep. Grayson?

Meanwhile, I rec this thread because the Republican dipshits would say or do anything to make Pelosi look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I think it was very appropriate for Debbie to respond to that
NRCC nutball. First of all she's a woman, and she's in the House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. There are a lot of progressive women Representatives in the House who could have
responded as well as, if not better than, Wasserman Test. She's DLC and does nothing for the progressive wing of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MidwestRick Donating Member (604 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. When did speaker Pelosi
fall into the military chain of command?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. She doesn't technically, but she does get to write their paychecks
and establish the rules that the military works under
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
20. Expressing an opinion aboutt propriety is now being in the military chain of command?
DUers must all be ten star generals, then.

Here's a couple of questions for you:

When did The Speaker of the House lose her right to express an opinion when being interviewed?

And do you know that this board is only for Democrats?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigbrother05 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. Where did she offer military advice?
She merely pointed out that the Gen should have followed the chain of command and raised his concerns within that framework. The Pukes have for years expressed the exact same sentiments when their guy was in office. Even hypocrites would be ashamed to make such a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
21. Those in the chain of military command do not offer advice. They give orders.
MidwestRick seems to be going the Rethugs one better on this one. Where is the pizza when we need it most?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Military telling us what to do. What's wrong with that picture?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueIdaho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. "80 percent male and 100 percent white" - that's beautiful!
Let's hammer this home - the NRCC does not look like America, does not think like America, and does not act like America. It IS the old boys club.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Good use of rhetorical overstatement there.
Edited on Wed Oct-07-09 02:50 PM by burning rain
Rep. Joseph Cao (R-Loozyanna), a Vietnamese-American, does give the House GOP a little person-of-color chic. That feller's surely a one termer, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Oh, jeez, that wasn't overstatement. One man out of the hundred upon hundreds of white
men the opposition has put in Congress all these years?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Make that "the ODD boys club!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. Rude but how is it sexist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katkat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. sexist = "put her in her place" I can just hear "kitchen and bedroom" after that n/t
Edited on Wed Oct-07-09 03:04 PM by katkat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. +1
exactly. they are stupid, but they are not stupid to say it in plain english. plain enough for me what they think pelosi's place is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-08-09 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
23. Please see Reply 19. Let me guess: You're a hetero white male.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. GOP = Grand Old Patriarchy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colsohlibgal Donating Member (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-07-09 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. She's Correct
It was completely sexist, a more direct form of the code the wing nuts use, you needn't be a brain surgeon to decode this stuff, for example 'ACORN" = black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC