Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Call me crazy but I predict in 2012 after winning re-election, Obama will have Paul Krugman onboard

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:29 PM
Original message
Call me crazy but I predict in 2012 after winning re-election, Obama will have Paul Krugman onboard
Paul Krugman will be his Economic Adviser after he wins this very close election



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. wrong! the world blows up on Dec 12 2012
didnt you hear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The election is in November
So he could be on board according to the OP before the world blows up in December.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shagbark Hickory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. The election against sarah palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I really hope you are right - on both counts. If the unemployment
situation continues for years - there is no way he will be re-elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes - think FDR's second term
I think he had Henry A. Wallace (personal hero of mine) as VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thickasabrick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. LOL...you made me look. You can now count me as one of the
people who knows about Henry Wallace! I had never heard of him and that bothered me.

I wonder what would have happened if he had become the president instead of Truman...

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Simple: No Cold War, No Vietnam War, No Nixon Recession...
One unified world met at the middle....

Think about it - he was a TRUE PROGRESSIVE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. The shit we are doing isn't working
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
7. I will take any odds, any amount...
...that he will not. Because he's already worked in a White House, didn't like it, walked away from similar offers in the past, and shows no inclination to change. He's on record as not being willing to do a job where he has to sell policies he doesn't believe in, and take responsibility for actions over which he has no real control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Things have changed, on both sides
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Give me the odds, name the stakes. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Don't go all Vega$ on me!
The odds are ALWAYS on the house!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. please be right
*must save this thread!*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I am just thinking a Wallace=Krugman connection
History repeating itself...

Perhaps if we had a write in revolution for both....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seattle_blue Donating Member (299 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Strange that you should say that.
Yesterday I was reading a Krugman article and I was wondering why he wasn't on team Obama already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. Just to make Glenn Beck shit in his pants
That would be a sight to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
the other one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
15. You are crazy
I said it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. Brotha let us bet a blunt over it....
Arrrrrrrrr....me hearties!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
16. Why wait until 2012?
The economy needs help now. And with Krugman running economic policy now, Obama will win re-election easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. It seems to take a while for things to make it up to the top...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. I'd rather see Stiglitz or Galbraith.
No offense to Krugman, who I like, but there are more consistent and accurate left-wing economists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC