Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question 1 TV ad sparks charges of ‘blatant misinformation’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 03:47 PM
Original message
Question 1 TV ad sparks charges of ‘blatant misinformation’
http://www.bangordailynews.com/detail/123520.html

You have probably seen the television advertisement by now. It warns that if Maine’s recently passed law that allows same-sex marriage is upheld by voters in November, schools could be mandated to teach students about it, according to Stand for Marriage Maine, the group that paid for the ad titled, “Everything to Do With Schools.”

Numerous educators interviewed this week, however, agreed that there is nothing in state guidelines or local curricula that addresses teaching about marriage, let alone same-sex marriage, and the outcome of Question 1 would not change that.

“It’s troublesome that such blatant misinformation about how this would affect education is being portrayed,” said David Connerty-Marin, spokesman for the Maine Department of Education. “The ad is simply incorrect.”

The narrator of the 30-second spot that has flooded local airwaves recently is Charla Bansley. She’s identified as an Ellsworth schoolteacher, although she does not teach in a public school and is better known as the Maine state director of Concerned Women for America, a conservative advocacy group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Everytime that ad comes on my husband yells and curses at the TV.
It really gets him upset.
When someone has to lie, you know they have a losing argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes on 1 was hoping for the low voter turnout
of an off year election to screw over the local GLBT populace. Other ballot issues may be enough to drive turnout to a point where we can stop them in their tracks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WonderGrunion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm hoping this gets out soon enough
and gets enough local press to make a difference in the upcoming vote. Mainers may be hidebound and resistant to change, but we can seldom tolerate liars. I've been encouraged by the amount of support the "No on 1" side has been getting from local liberal religious leaders. This is going to be such a close vote, but I think we can prevent the bigots from winning one this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC