Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Shot in the face but not in the heart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:48 PM
Original message
Shot in the face but not in the heart
PORTLAND, Ore. – Chrissy Steltz is recovering at Legacy Emanuel Hospital Thursday after having received the first of three life-changing facial surgeries Wednesday.

Since 1999 she’s been living without her eyes, nose, and part of her face.

Another teenager shot her with a 12-gauge shotgun from 5 ½ feet away, amazingly missing her brain. It occurred at a gathering where underage drinking was taking place and involved a gun that had been stolen in a burglary.

The wounds have been significant for Steltz and have been hidden behind a mask.

“I have a 10-year-old sister, and I have always taught her that beauty is on the inside,” she said.

Eventually, she will be fitted with a prosthetic face.

Her injuries haven’t stopped her from living: she’s been teaching blind children life skills.

“Life is what you make it,” she said.

And now she and her partner, Jeffrey, who’s also blind, are raising their 2-month-old baby boy, which leaves no time for self-pity.

“Just because you have a tragic thing happen in your life, it doesn’t mean that your life is over,” she said.

Steltz is having the surgeries ten years later because the Oregon Health Plan denied her coverage of the procedure because it considered the surgeries to be cosmetic. However, her doctor, Eric Dierks, and others are donating their services.



http://www.katu.com/news/63192497.html

She is one remarkable person. And that insurance company should be ashamed. Cosmetic my ass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. That IS an amazing story...
And how right she is...beauty is on the inside.

Nevertheless, we live in the public eye, so the insurance company did a very wrong thing in denying her coverage.

They should indeed be ashamed and major kudos to her doctors!

I wish her well with all her future surgeries!


K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. her face in the second picture is round and young and pretty. Lovely
girl. She is an inspiration to us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzteris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. COSMETIC?
I hope they all die a hideous horrible painful prolonged death. jfhc . . . I can't believe people are that that that aaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhh :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. unbelievable...i am speechless
:wow: you don't need a FACE...it's just cosmetic :wtf:
she had to wait ten years. the people responsible for denying her healthcare should have their faces shot off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. +10. I'd volunteer to help with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sounds like a "death panel" to me
:grr: :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
central scrutinizer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. republican response
It's a personal responsibility issue - if she hadn't been at the party where illegal activities were taking place, this wouldn't have happened - so tough shit - deal with it - don't raise my taxes to pay for this stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
7. Saw her interview last night
on the local news. It was the most inspiring 3 minutes of TV I've ever seen: this young woman, handicapped with the loss of her face, remains calm, upbeat, pragmatic, but hopeful for the future. I rarely have this kind of connection with talking heads on the idiot box, but I really wanted to meet this incredible person. Go Chrissy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. Any insurance company that decided that having gaping holes in
in half of your face is just a cosmetic issue should be fired. How mercenary can they get in the quest for profits. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. It was Oregon's state run Medicaid program.
Edited on Fri Oct-02-09 04:47 PM by Hissyspit
Rationing is built into the system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_Health_Plan

Obviously, this is not necessarily the plan to be emulated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
11. She waited TEN FUCKING YEARS for a face....
...because it was deemed cosmetic!?!?!?!?!?! OMG....

Somewhere in hell there is a place ~~ a very hot and special place ~~ for the assholes who made a mockery of that health care system!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Are_grits_groceries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And some people wonder why insurance companies
aren't trusted. I'd like Baucus to justify this case.

They have "mean & cruel" panels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC