Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush's Gravest Impeachable Crime

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:06 PM
Original message
Bush's Gravest Impeachable Crime
A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTION
by Dave Lindorff

When my co-author Barbara Olshansky and I wrote The Case for Impeachment during the waning months of 2005 and early 2006, it seemed clear to us that the biggest impeachable crimes of the Bush regime involved the illegal war against Iraq, and the trashing of the rights and civil liberties enshrined in the Constitution. Almost as an afterthought, we also included a proposed article of impeachment against the president for his insidious efforts to block any regulatory, Congressional, or international action on confronting global warming.

Now that the first two UN reports on the causes and magnitude of the threats posed by global warming have come out -- albeit in watered down form, thanks in part to the administration's continuing efforts to downplay the crisis -- and now that independent scientific research is suggesting the disaster facing life on earth, and human life and civilization in particular is of catastrophic proportions, perhaps we should turn things around.

At this point, arguably, Bush's greatest crime is not the Iraq War, terrible as that has been. Nor is it his revocation of habeas corpus or his authorization of torture. It is not the usurpation of the legislative power of the Congress. It is not the felonious violation of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or his obstruction of the investigation into the outing of CIA agent Valerie Plame.

His biggest crime is a deliberate campaign of inaction and active obstruction in the face of a clear need for the United States to act decisively to stop or slow catastrophic climate change.

This president has not simply denied the reality of global warming. He has actively lied to the American people about the dangers ahead...

More here: http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/contributors/930
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Very sad that we find ourselves in the position of ranking Bush**'s lies
But I believe there is no worst lie. EACH lie is a crime against the people and the office. There's no sense in asking when Congress is going to hold Bush** and his cabal accountable though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Any one of them will do
All I ask is that they impeach him for any one of the impeachable offenses he's committed.

Just one would do, fine.

If they can impeach Clinton for a blow job, Bush should certainly be impeached for any number of things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep, no need to be picky
There's plenty of crimes to choose from. I'd prefer Cheney first, then Bush**. Perhaps even dueling impeachments. Then wrap them up, put a big bow on them and ship them to the Hague (which has some interest in speaking with them too).

I doubt we'll ever see as much as the first part happen in reality. But that doesn't mean I can't dream about justice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indie_voter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Yep.... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I disagree
I think it was the fact that a gay male prostitute had sleep-overs at The White House.

I'm basing this on the legal precedent set during the last administration, during which we learned that what the President does with his penis is more important than any other aspect of his job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chknltl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Well put!
I am at loss as to why bush has not been impeached already fer Pete's sake! What EXACTLY must a President do in order TO get impeached these days....?


:sarcasm: Maybe the anti-impeachers here in the DU can suggest legislation to remove that antiquated and apparently totally useless notion of impeachment... :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. do a Freedom of Information search for his "Oath of Office" if it isn't signed he is impersonating a
a president. you see they dont sign it because impersonating a president is a misdemeanor, being a War president under false pretenses is a FELONY.. Torture is a Felony..etc ..ad infinitum

they do that as a 'get out of jain free card'... few if any elected officials or judges ever sign it.. if you can call the president on it and try to force him to sign it he will RESIGN before he does.. that's a Fact
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. the wrong president at the wrong time.
if only gore had picked a better running mate, and campaigned a little better...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
11. I've always felt it was his criminalization of the 50% of americans whoare dems
Dividing his own people and calling the democrats terrorists has always been impeachable, and that started in his campaign.

As soon as I was demonized as a democrat, he had failed. And giving "his"followers permission to insult all of his non-supporters is unthinkable.

Imagine Clinton, either one, saying, "Those republicans are supporting, aiding and abetting terrorists. Republicans are not patriotic."

And then that would give democrats the permission to label republicans communists, etc.

Its unthinkable, but we've all become so accustomed to it, we don't bristle at it any more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. but he is totally immune from impeachment.
No chance at all that it will happen.
He will leave office "honorably" and happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. They are only "immune" if we fail to fight. Rejecting self-defeating prophesies. . .
. . .is Step 1 in the fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. If impeachment fails to reject their fascist fantasy of unitary authoritarian power. .
Edited on Sun Apr-15-07 02:03 PM by pat_k
. . .we are surrendering our capacity to recover from disaster with humanity, solve our common problems in ways that reflect our common values, and serve as a force for good in the world. When the good will of the American people is cut out of the loop, no peoples -- not our fellow Americans, not other nations-- can look to us for help on ANYTHING (including global warming).

The most devastating of all their offenses against our constitutional democracy is the Unconstitutional and Un-American bush-cheney "doctrine" that the Office of the President has "inherent" unitary authoritarian power to violate our Constitution and U.S. Code at will to "protect us." When they invoke that "doctrine" they violate the principle of consent -- the sole moral principle on which our Constitution, and therefore the nation is founded.

While it can be argued that Bush and Cheney are invoking the fascist fig leaf of unitary power to justify their attempts to block regulatory action to confront global warming, there are FAR more blatant instances in which they openly do something forbidden under our Constitution and U.S. Code and publicly declare themselves exempt from our law. They have committed violations that are so widely recognized as intolerable that they are subject to the penalty of death. The clearest way to unequivocally reject their fascist "doctrine" is by impeaching them for one of those forbidden acts.

Any one of the following five would fit the bill:
  • violating Title 18 section 2441 (War Crimes)
    1) declaring Guantanamo a "Geneva-free" zone1
    2) the CIA's "extraordinary rendition" program
    3) abusing signing statements to nullify McCain's anti-torture amendment

  • violating the principle of consent
    4) any of the signing statements that nullifies a provision of law by declaring the executive exempt.

  • violating of Title 50, Section 1805 (Issuance of order)
    5) spying under color of law w/o warrant.
When we unequivocally reject the fascist fantasy at the heart of their war on the Constitution by impeaching Bush and Cheney for any one of the above, the next step is obvious. That is, all promoters of the fascist fantasy must be purged from the government. (Something that impeachment on some other grounds will fail to do).

Bush and Cheney convict themselves of subverting our constitutional democracy with their own public statements and actions. (Both Bush and Cheney must be impeached because they both invoke the fig leaf of unitary authoritarian power.) There is no simpler case for impeachment. By making the simplest case grounded in the broad principles that define who we are, Members of Congress have an unprecedented opportunity to become champions of the Constitution and the People's government. It is an unprecedented opportunity to inspire and engage people across the political spectrum.

I do not mean to minimize the devastating effects of global warming. If the planet is rendered uninhabitable, it doesn't much matter whether America was a dictatorship or a constitutional democracy. But the USA can ONLY have a role in creating rational global and domestic policy if we rescue the foundation that makes us capable of enacting and enforcing our collective will.

========================================
  1. February 7, 2002, the Office of the President published http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/02/20020207-13.html">Fact Sheet: Status of Detainees at Guantanamo, in which they declared "The President has determined that the Geneva Convention applies to the Taliban detainees, but not to the al-Qaida detainees."

    There was never any doubt the conventions applied to the abductees/detainees held by the USA, whether on or off shore. In Hamdan, even a Supreme Court stacked with their fascist minions couldn't escape that inescapable reality when they ruled that the conventions applied (and with that ruling, declared that three years of War Crimes had already been committed -- something that had been self-evident all along).

    Under the Geneva conventions, Parties to the treaty must enact and enforce the conventions under domestic law. To this end we enacted U.S. Code Title 18 section 2441 (War Crimes). When the Office of the President asserted the power to arbitrarily dictate which groups are, and are not, subject to the Geneva conventions, they gutted our War Crimes statute, an act that is in itself a War Crime. We know J.T.F-170 employs "harsh interrogation" (torture), but there is no need to argue or prove the point because, whether or not they actually engaged in torture, they committed a War Crime when they gutted the law.

    There is a reason that violators of Geneva are subject to the death penalty -- to give those with the power to commit such crimes a compelling motive not to step anywhere near "the line." And to give those with the power to stop the crimes a compelling motive to do everything in their power to do so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. I completely agree. All their crimes are subordinate to this, their greatest crime.
This, their greatest crime against the nation and humanity itself, resonates into the future and opens the door to abuses yet unseen. It is not to be tolerated under any reasonable sense of justice and humanity. It MUST be addressed ... or we're doomed to a parade of crimes against humanity stretching into the future of our children and our children's children and beyond. The price can only grow until it becomes ever more incalculable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-15-07 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-16-07 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. Biggest Crime
I suppose I could agree with you thoughts on this subject, however, I doubt you can make a case that it meets the requirements of Article II, section 4 of the Constitution. There are sufficient crimes already committed by this administration that do meet the constitutional requirements, we should act on those, if we want success.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC