Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone think this news about social security is a ploy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 11:57 AM
Original message
Does anyone think this news about social security is a ploy
I believe that Obama is forcing the issue of making the people against a public option, because it's socialism, to start complaining about social security. Only to have it pointed out to them that SS is "socialism" too. Pardon me if this idea has been posted already. I think Obama is a lot smarter than the right gives him credit for.


Peace

Max
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. What news about SS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sorry I forgot to post a link
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/us/politics/03benefits.html
No increase in benefits the next two years. And I apologize if my post was poorly worded. Sometimes my fingers are faster than me noggin'


Peace


Max
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Actually, that came out quite some time ago. Where was the outrage?
Right here on DU, we poor folk who depend on this were told to STFU.

So much for "progressive" compassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. The previous administration raided social security...it wasn't such a problem before that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Exactly
But wait until the right gets on their high horse about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. My point is
I think it is going to show the hypocrisy of the people who are against the public option and public healthcare. That is what I was trying to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Silver Swan Donating Member (805 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was just on another forum
where people were trying to blame Obama for this.

I pointed out that the provision involved has been part of Social Security law for over thirty years.

I guess this is just another way Obama was planning ahead when he was just a wee lad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Of course he did
I understand it's the law that it can't be lowered. He was a precocious lad to have thought of this back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. The right is going after VA and their "Death Book" now. We have been using
the VA as an example, so now they are saying the VA is urging older vets to end their own lives.

Transcript. I'd also look for the video because they may have rewritten what was actually said by Tammy Duckworth.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,541820,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They are grasping at straws
Edited on Mon Aug-24-09 01:46 PM by maxpower
Good lord is there no end to how low they can sink? Bush is the one who cut the VA budget.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Jim Towey, form head of bush's Faith Based Initiative wrote a book he wanted
the VA to buy in bulk, but the VA refused, so I guess he is getting even with them by spreading lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Come on only the left lies
You can't spell righteous without right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Ha! That was their big mistake. They tried to paint us as liars
so we made extra effort to make sure our arguments were based on facts. Karl Rove and people like him decided that truth was overrated and went with the "noble lie" that was espoused by the Straussians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. He is smart and frankly ethical but this has more to do
with where his political ideology is falling and it seems to be moving to moderate conservative and very corporate friendly. I hope I am wrong and you are right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Me too
It seems that the game always gets rigged, and not in our favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. He always was a conservative. You remember when he first
got into the Senate, his voting record pointed to a more centrist than leftist stance. I remember some were rather disappointed in him. I thought the expectations for him being the great left hope was unrealistic.

Governing from the center is more productive because it better reflects the nation as a whole. I'd rather see a more leftist president, but that's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. I would too
The lefter the better. But this is a fleeting fantasy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Anyway, he's ours, warts and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxpower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Just look at my signature line
Congress, the house in particular, have to run too often so they are always campaigning. Campaigning = Pandering. Campaign finance reform now!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-24-09 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. At about the same time this was being discussed earlier this year
there came tp be the automatic pay raise for congress, of about $4500 +/-. They decided not to refuse the increase, and let it pass. At about the same time, Harry Reid attached an increase for federal judges to the auto bailout bill, giving them about the same percentage increase. Judges would not have rec'd an increase otherwise.

They have talked about no pay increase for congress in fiscal year 2010, but I'll be watching out my window for airborne pigs in vee formation flying by.

Here's a couple of links re congress pay increase
-------

http://www.washingtonwatch.com/blog/2009/01/07/no-salary-increase-for-congress-in-fiscal-2010/ this link has several updates

No Salary Increase for Congress in Fiscal 2010 <this is the header for the article>
-------
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/house-freezes-pay-raise-for-2010-2009-02-25.html

<snip>Lawmakers automatically receive a cost-of-living adjustment every year to keep in step with inflation.

But in a period of economic turmoil when many Americans have lost their jobs and are struggling to make ends meet, members have overwhelmingly supported blocking their pay increase in 2010. <more at link>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC