Now I guess we will find out if there really is a 'Deep Throat' in this White House....

[Blackhatjack]

There has been speculation that an insider has been feeding incriminating information to investigators and news sources.

Now that the WHite House has essentially said we are going to 'coverup' the damaging emails that would have gone through the RNC servers by White House staff, if the incriminating ones start appearing we will have our answer.

It must be driving Bush and Rove crazy trying to figure out who is doing the 'leaking.'

ANd their biggest problem is they are unsure what the Congressional investigators 'have' already. If they fail to produce what the Congressional investigators already have, it will be clear evidence of a coverup by the White House --and then it is 'Katy Bar The Door.'

[GreenPartyVoter]

1. Maybe it's Cheney?

:rofl:

[petepillow]

3. I'd say laura, but...

i doubt she's lucid enough to do much of anything outside of a photo-op

[SpiralHawk]

20. No. It's Jeff Gannon, the notorious male prostitute

Who was welcomed into George AWOL Bush's White House over 200 times, including overnighters, according to the official Secret Service Records....


Why does the corporate media bend over and assume the position for Commander AWOL and his special relationship with a notorious male prostitute?

What's with that?

Why are republicons in favor of White House male prostitutes
for republicon "leaders"?

[meegbear]

2. NO SEX THREADS!

[MUAD_DIB]

4. I hope that Congress has everything or hortly will.

No impeachment for these criminals. That's no longer good enough for them. Show them all the gallows.

[ThomWV]

5. A Frightened Felon Works Just As Well

Give one or two of them immunity and watch what happens ...

[RevCheesehead]

6. My money's on Barney.

Damned smart, those Scotties. :)

[Richard D]

12. My thought exactly

You can see it in his face and body language that a deep river runs there.

[Bitwit1234]

16. Oh boy Another bush dog selling secrets.

[RevCheesehead]

19. AND....

The first one's named DUKE. :evilgrin:

[shraby]

7. I have a feeling Leahy has a lot more than we

know because he flat-out said they were lying about the emails.

[Blackhatjack]

9. I suspect from Waxman's response he was not surprised, and is loaded as well...n/t

[DemReadingDU]

10. Waxman, Leahy, Conyers too

:)

[truedelphi]

8. Or maybe a hacker - a sophisticated one

Warning! Do not try this at home (Could locate embarassing and or interesting information that was not meant for your eyes. And this is utilizing just relatively unsophisticated (and legal) hack techniques)


From: MSN Hacking part 4
rmorril
(Senior Security Engineer) Posted 9/7/2006
Comments (4) | Trackbacks (0)



Part of the continuing series on using MSN as a hacking tool, parts one, two, and three can be found by clicking on the above links. This morning boingboing put out a note on their web site about searching for the phrase confidential "do not distribute" which was highly amusing, so decided to try it in MSN. The search string http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=confidential+%22do+not+distribute%22&FORM=QBHP returned around 15,000 results or a lot less than the 68,000 results from Google, but amusing none the same. Looking up private or confidential information in the web search engines is today's lessons. This is purely an academic exercise and should be used to determine if you have any private or confidential information in the search engines.

Lets build out a strategy where I want to gather spread sheets with telephone numbers in them. So we use phone filetype:xls with the search returns http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=phone+filetype%3Axls&FORM=QBRE 75,000 results. That is way too many so lets narrow it down by adding site:gov to just get government spreadsheets http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=phone+filetype%3Axls+site%3Agov&FORM=QBRE which returns 2,000 which is a much more manageable number of returns to deal with. Narrowing it even further to just the white house returns a handful of results that are more fun fun to play with. The returns for phone filetype:xls site:whitehouse.gov is here. http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=phone+filetype%3Axls+site%3Awhitehouse.gov&FORM=QBNO and we end up with a business analyst that works for the white house but who's registered address is in Auburn NY. We have the name, phone number, address, position that they work in, where they work, and did anyone really want anyone with a browser to find this kind of information? (HINT: Comb your web based systems looking for this kind of information before every stalker on the planet figures this one out).

Moving away from the white house, lets look at the National Institutes of Health and see what we can find there by changing site:whitehouse.gov to site:nih.gov. There are 13 results in the list that can be informational as to who is doing what at NIH. http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=phone+filetype%3Axls+site%3Anih.gov&FORM=QBRE

Changing keywords from phone to budget gives us 22 results. http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=budget+filetype%3Axls+site%3Anih.gov&FORM=QBNO

Changing the keywords from budget to travel gives us 16 results. http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=travel+filetype%3Axls+site%3Anih.gov&FORM=QBRE
So much like Google when narrowing down the search sting to meaningful data that can then otherwise be used it is important to keep the results small so that the data set is not so huge that it is meaningless. That is one of the issues with any search engine hacking, is that the data set can be so huge that it is meaningless or more trouble to go through than it is worth in the longer run. There are hundreds of government agencies that have this kind of information available on the internet, so don't think I am just picking on the government, it is not just their issue either. Although confidential "do not distribute" gave very few if any results when dealing with individual government agencies, but a lot when dealing with the internet as a whole.

Again, this is an academic exercise to determine how MSN hacking compares to Google hacking, and should only be used to find your own companies information on the internet to see if there is anything interesting in the MSN search engine that you should know about.

If you have any questions on MSN Hacking feel free to respond to this forum. Remember that this is for educational purposes only, and an effort to assist information security people in using MSN to hack their own web sites and see what the search engine has about them. Google hacking can be found everywhere, MSN hacking is still a burgeoning science that we would all do well to learn.

[HereSince1628]

11. The piles of shit are evidence of a DEEP ANUS in the WH n/t

[will_in_chicago]

13. I suspect

I suspect that there are many people leaking information, seeking to save themselves and bring about some changes in this country. Some people may be cutting deals, and I would not be surprised if the leakers have taken some steps to protect themselves.

And now for the obligatory joke about the identity of the new Deep Throat ..... I thought Jeff Gannon had that position.:o :puke:

[Blackhatjack]

14. The White House created lots of incentive to become a leaker by blaming underling scapegoats...

Once people who work inside the White House see that the top dogs will blame underlings for their bad acts, those underlings tend to start thinking about ways they can protect themselves. As this Administration begins to implode, they can see the train coming and decide it is time to use that material.

Sampson did not want to be a scapegoat. Others have turned down that role as well.

It only makes sense that some of these have remained unidentified and provided information to Congressional investigators in return for future considerations of immunity if necessary.

[Blackhatjack]

15. Big Diff between this scandal coverup and Watergate is who is getting the inside info...

In the Watergate scandal the information was leaked to the Washington Post reporters, Woodward and Bernstein.

In this scandal the information is most likely being leaked directly to Democratic Congressional Investigators, since there are no MSM outlets that can be trusted with the information.

If this plays out, it will be a condemnation of not only this Administration's corrupt practices but the MSM role in helping them pull it off.

[ThomWV]

17. Thank You! Very Perceptive and well put.

It had not occured to me to look at these events from that perspective. Thank you.

[Blackhatjack]

18. At the very least, when this all hits the fan, corp MSM should be broken up and regulated again...

Otherwise the framework is in place to make this happen all over again.