Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Death panel" architect a pro-life Republican from Georgia?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:46 PM
Original message
"Death panel" architect a pro-life Republican from Georgia?
Edited on Mon Aug-10-09 03:55 PM by kpete
Source: Institute For Southern Studies

"Death panel" architect a pro-life Republican from Georgia?

Last week former Republican vice presidential candidate and Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin posted a statement to her Facebook page in which she warned that President Obama's health care reform plan would result in a so-called "death panel" with the power to kill elderly people and those with disabilities:

................

But there is nothing resembling the alleged "death panel" in the health care reform plan. A spokesperson for Palin told ABC News that the former governor was referring to a section promoting advance care planning that appears on page 425 of the House Democrats' bill http://edlabor.house.gov/documents/111/pdf/publications/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf. Advance care planning includes living wills and durable powers of attorney that allow individuals to make clear their wishes for end-of-life care, whatever they may be.

And as it turns out, the cause of advance planning has been championed especially strongly by a pro-life Republican -- U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson of Georgia.

Isakson has been promoting advance care planning for years. In 2007, for example, he co-sponsored two bills to encourage such planning -- the Medicare End-of-Life Care Planning Act and the Advance Planning and Compassionate Care Act.


Read more: http://www.southernstudies.org/2009/08/death-panel-architect-a-pro-life-republican-from-georgia.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Challenge the bitch
(Apologies to all female dogs.)

Challenge Palin and anyone else who uses that kind if language to explain where they heard it and why they are repeating it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think sarah should do some research
she should spend a year locked in an alzheimer's ward of a nursing home then tell us all about the quality of life. Per right wing dumbasses Teri Schiavo should still be "alive" causing pain and suffering to her family, let alone the financial burden.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. You're so right.
Everyone should be prepared to give their sources when they discuss this. Like the way they keep referencing the Lewin Group without mentioning that they're owned by UnitedHealth. Would there be anyone with balls enough to say, "OK, you caught me, I pulled that one out of my ass"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. I believe it's the crazy right to lifers who are the front people disrupting these THs.
they've been fed this BS about Obama wanting to ..." and they're all riled up hoping for some kook to fulfill their hate filled dreams.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. Holy shit, a Republican is right about something
More physicians should be counseling their patients of all ages on advance directives, telling the medical establishment just how determined you are to live as a veg on a vent...or not.

Palin's lies about the subject make me absolutely furious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Great find! Bookmarking in case I have to debunk an idiot. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. And the bad thing is this is not a bad idea
in its context, even though it came from a Republican. But the same party is using it as a creation of the administration. I'm sure this is nothing new, there's probably a page in the Republican playbook that says something like "If one of our programs becomes unpopular, blame it on the Dems". Standard fare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingofalldems Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
9. Repubs are sneaky aren't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. I believe it should read "anti choice" Republican
Edited on Mon Aug-10-09 04:03 PM by mitchtv
pro life is a lie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes. Anti-universal health care is not pro-life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swede Atlanta Donating Member (906 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Rethuglicans are desparate.......
They will latch onto anything to get the public's attention....the more gruesome and macabre the better. They don't deal in fact...only in what works to get their agenda moving.

This whole "death panel" and "killing seniors" is a bunch of mularkey and we all know it. The whole idea is to ensure that people have, paid by their health care provider, consultation on end-of-life decisions whether made at 20 - 50 - or 90 years of age. This is a compassionate and responsible policy. This has nothing to do with rationing health care but those on the right have seized on a lie and as we know....."Saddam is in bed with Al Qaeda" told often enough bore fruit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-10-09 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. This has been known all along
It is actually a good amendment by a puke, the way it has been twisted is disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC