Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Up at Bradblog: FBI attempts To Block Edmonds Testimony

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:01 PM
Original message
Up at Bradblog: FBI attempts To Block Edmonds Testimony
Edited on Fri Aug-07-09 06:02 PM by mmonk
The BRAD BLOG has obtained both the FBI's response to FBI translator-turned-whistleblower Sibel Edmonds' notice of her intention to give a deposition this Saturday in response to a subpoena she received in a case before the Ohio Elections Commission (OEC). We've also been given exclusive access to her attorneys' response in turn which is to be officially released later this afternoon.

The FBI stated their objection to Edmonds' plans to testify in a two-page letter on Thursday, sent to Edmonds' attorney Stephen Kohn, at the National Whistleblowers Legal Defense & Education Fund. Edmonds and her attorneys, however, in their own two-page letter say the objections raised so far by the agency are not sufficient to block Edmonds' from "truthfully answer questions while under oath pursuant to a lawful subpoena" on Saturday morning in D.C. as scheduled.

-snip-

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7345
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Must be some *ss administration holdouts in the FBI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Not really, there are I'm sure some Turkish owned assets there.
Dang that sounds like Yoda.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Why id the FBI trying to supress? What did THEY do wrong that
they don't want known?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Still concerning the firing and the reasons I presume.
And of course "state secrets" as they would claim.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. A little too late for it, isn't it?
They were given TWO advance warnings. Both requests to respond from the DoJ were ignored. Sibel Edmonds should be clear to testify the state secrets tomorrow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But we all knew they would try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Too late now you complicit fuckers.
Soon even more people will know the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Wouldn't that be nice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. It will be! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is where the FBI and DOJ will have difficulty:
Yesterday, Valerie Caproni, General Counsel of the FBI, and Vesper Mei, Senior Counsel with the Department of Justice responded by claiming that the subpoena to testify served on Edmonds was invalid and sought to bar her from appearing. The DOJ claimed that that Edmonds is under "no compulsion" to testify in the Krikorian case and the FBI asserted that she, "does not have approval for any disclosure of any information."

Neither the Justice Department nor the FBI has stated why testimony in a case of alleged election fraud would involve State Secrets and/or involve national security.

-snip-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-07-09 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Go comment at Brad's blog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC