Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ENOLA GAY

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:37 PM
Original message
ENOLA GAY

SUGIZO - RISE TO COSMIC DANCE - ENOLA GAY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HMMezWwLUYE

SUGIZO & THE SPANK YOUR JUICE - Ballad of their footsteps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFnEOFSYsrA&feature=channel

SUGIZO - RISE TO COSMIC DANCE - Synchronicity
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yggxbW8zj6M&feature=related

At 08:15 (Hiroshima time)on August 6, 1945, the gravity bomb known as "Little Boy", a gun-type fission weapon with 60 kilograms (130 lb) of uranium-235, was released from the 393d Bombardment Squadron B-29 Enola Gay (named after Colonel Tibbets' mother), piloted and commanded by 509th Composite Group commander Colonel Paul Tibbets. The bomb took 57 seconds to fall from the aircraft to the predetermined detonation height about 600 metres (2,000 ft) above the city. Due to crosswind, it missed the aiming point, the Aioi Bridge, by almost 800 feet (240 m) and detonated directly over Shima Surgical Clinic.

70,000–80,000 people, or some 30% of the population of Hiroshima were killed immediately, and another 70,000 injured. Over 90% of the doctors and 93% of the nurses in Hiroshima were killed or injured. Although the United States had previously dropped leaflets warning civilians of air raids on twelve other Japanese cities, the residents of Hiroshima were given no notice of the atomic bomb.

Estimates of total deaths by the end of 1945 from burns, radiation and related disease, the effects of which were aggravated by lack of medical resources, range from 90,000 to 140,000. Some estimates state up to 200,000 had died by 1950, due to cancer and other long-term effects.

from Wiki


May Peace on Earth Prevail....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok, 800 feet; atomic bomb
there's really no case to be made that if the winds had not shifted, it would not have taken out the Shima Surgical Clinic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pretty low casualty rates
compared to the estimates for an invasion.

And unconditional surrender was the only acceptable option in '45.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Agreed. It is hard but we must remember how things were back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. People don't know....
I've read about the proposed invasion and the projected figures. It would have been hell on earth.


It took two nukes to knock them into unconditional surrender. It should tell how hard they would have fought a land invasion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. FYI: Howard Zinn on Hiroshima & Nagasaki: The Bombs of August

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Zinn/Bombs_August.html

In fact, the bombs that fell on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not forestall an invasion of Japan because no invasion was necessary. The Japanese were on the verge of surrender, and American military leaders knew that. General Eisenhower, briefed by Secretary of War Henry Stimson on the imminent use of the bomb, told him that "Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary."

After the bombing, Admiral William D. Leary, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called the atomic bomb "a barbarous weapon," also noting that: "The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Tojo was nowhere near surrended
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 09:18 AM by WeDidIt
An Tojo called the shots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. Tojo resigned in July. You don't know what you are talking about. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Forgive me, I meant Anami
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 09:37 AM by WeDidIt
Sorry about that. Anami was the person adament against surrender, and he controlled the military.

He even opposed surrender AFTER Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but after the bombs, Hirohito had enough and threw in the sponge.

The bombings were the only way you were going to get Hirohito to end the war. He depended upon his War Ministry and Anami ran it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw the Enola Gay...
At the Smithsonian Air & Space museum back in 1996.

Awesome aircraft, and "Little Boy" was *NOT* little.

When I think of that time, 64 years ago, things were far different.
"Smart Bombs" were so primitive they hardly worked at all.

We were facing an enemy, (Japan,) at Iwo Jima and Okinawa they fought until they died. Literally.
Had US and other Allied troops invaded the home islands of Japan, the slaughter would have been in the millions.

The A-bombs were a severe shock, to the Japanese military, and jolted them out of their "We'll all fight to the death" mentality.

That's why I don't judge Truman, LeMay, etc by my standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Correct me if I'm wrong.
The Japanese military did refuse to surrender. The Emperor of Japan had to step in and surrender himself. He did this after he was informed of the new weapon that the U.S. had that destroyed entire cities.

It was a terrible thing but in the end it did save more lives than it took. I hope that nukes are never used in anger again but some day it may be necessary. We would be wise to be prepared for the worst but hope for the best.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyepaddle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #10
19. Yes, it was only when Emperor Hirohito told the most ardently militaristis members of
the governement that he was thowing in the towel that they actually submitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Archae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. And even then, a group of fanatical officers tried a coup.
They killed their CO, tried to disrupt the Emperor's brodcast and when that failed, they killed themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheMightyFavog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #3
21. Let's not forget the Soviets.
You know they would have involved themselves in an invasion of Japan. We would have likely ended up with a situation in Japan similar to North and South Korea today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. No More Nukes - War is Outdated - War No More!
Supporters of the bombings generally assert that they caused the Japanese surrender, preventing massive casualties on both sides in the planned invasion of Japan: Kyūshū was to be invaded in October 1945 and Honshū five months later. Some estimate Allied forces would have suffered 1 million casualties in such a scenario, while Japanese casualties would have been in the millions. Others who oppose the bombings argue that it was simply an extension of the already fierce conventional bombing campaign and, therefore militarily unnecessary, inherently immoral, a war crime, or a form of state terrorism.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. There was NOT going to be an invasion of Japan.
After the bonsai charges the U.S. learned that an invasion of Japan would cost too many U.S. lives. The question was how to get Japan to surrender. The nukes were most likely the best option that resulted in the least loss of life with the least human suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. "Bonsai charges" LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unkachuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. and we were the first and only!
....200,000 innocent civilian men, women and children perished because we couldn't invent a more creative way to release that nuclear genie on humanity....

....and we wonder why smaller nations want nuclear weapons to defend themselves from us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. They died because the Japanese government wouldn't throw in the towel.
We offered them terms several times before we used the nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-05-09 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Lyric - Ballad of their footsteps
nothing, nothing, nothing at all
what was born? a star is born in the dark universe

nothing, nothing, nothing at all
dying, dying, dying into tomorrow
on the star, dying from the dirty past

The star was in the night, then morning came
nothing on the earth, just wind was blowing through

<whisle...>

nothing, nothing, nothing at all
dying, dying, soldiers are dying
on the star, dying from the life that could not love

The battle does not stop
why do they want to kill each other?
The battle does not stop
Why don't they understand?
The battle still continues on
Nothing will be born out of this
Somebody, please stop
Stop the world's horror

nothing on the earth, only a soul was wondering haunted
nothing on the earth, only wind was blowing through
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. By remember the truth of war, we can abolish it nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-06-09 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
20. gosh, nobody is commenting how great Sugizo is!!!!
Edited on Thu Aug-06-09 10:44 AM by kgnu_fan
I love his guitar and he is an amazing violinist!!!!!!

He is also really beautiful to look at!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC