|
Firstly I do not think their was 'an entry' that makes a presumption of beginning or end that is contained in time and not coherent within a break in space time. But their does seem to be other forces at work.
From my perspective it is something else. There are inconsistencies with that model, if there was a break in space time, there should be correlating events from those actions that would naturally follow those events. In other words their would be some things that happened that have not happened. Without totality of non linearness of time, some events should have happened that have not yet happened. It would require a very structured set of a frame work for what should progress not to progress even in a break in space time, since probably secondaries would have to be dialed out specifically around things, from my perspective, that should have occurred.
So if you look at some very obvious cause and effects. You see some causes, but the effects do not follow what should occur from those causation events. And if primary events occur without secondary events, then the reason for primary events change, since they do not create secondary event, but allude to that as the intent. And any form of action that alludes to one thing but does not reach that conclusion is looked at in an inaccurate way.
If something happens, it should be obvious that something else would occur, when that second obvious event does not occur, the entire reality of the first event is in question. Quiet simply the lack of consistency in secondary events from primary events shows the primary events are different then what they seem to be. And most likely an illusion to effect perception(from my perspective) and not the events they appear to be.
So I do not believe a rip in space time has occurred, for if that was really what happened certain other things would have happened. Or if there was a rip and entry, then that entry is far more then the rip since cause and effect, even taking in effect non linear progressions still have not occurred in what should have been a very simple progression.
From that, even not knowing things outside of perspective, it is still posible to find patterns and very low probability causes, and much higher probability causes, that can lead to better decisions on actions to take, and perceptions to have.
|