Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP, Robinson: Misogyny in the Morning (from plenty of radio jocks)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:22 AM
Original message
WP, Robinson: Misogyny in the Morning (from plenty of radio jocks)
Misogyny in the Morning
By Eugene Robinson
Tuesday, April 10, 2007; Page A17

....I'm not sure that kicking (Imus) off the air would accomplish much of anything, since there would still be plenty of morning radio jocks spewing racism, misogyny and other forms of cruelty for the amusement of gridlock-bound commuters. Howard Stern, another radio superstar who has expanded into television, recently held a degrading "Miss Black Howard Stern" contest.

Drive-time radio has become a free-fire zone, a forum for crude and objectionable speech that would be out of bounds anywhere else. There's an intimacy about radio. The medium creates the illusion of privacy -- it's just the jock and his or her entourage speaking to you, the listener, alone in your car where nobody else can hear.

Maybe, in your heart of hearts, you think some of those stereotypes are true -- about black people, or white people, or Latinos or Asians. Somewhere on the radio dial you'll find some jock who not only agrees but is willing to say so out loud, willing to ridicule those "others" and thus cut them down to size. You can have all your prejudices confirmed on your way to work. It's almost like putting on a suit of psychological armor.

If anything, Imus is more substantive and less offensive than many of his competitors. In a sense, that's one reason for his current predicament. Prominent politicians and other notables regularly call in to his show, and sometimes actual news is made -- which brings him greater scrutiny. You can be a shock jock or you can be a respected interviewer, but you can't be both.

One question remains, though: Why would Imus think to use the word "ho" to describe those young women from Rutgers -- or, for that matter, to describe any women?...It's easy to surmise that Imus came out with the word "ho" because hip-hop is an African American art form and he associated the word with black women....That's something for Imus to think about as he performs the ritual public examination of his soul -- and fights to keep his job. Meanwhile, the rest of us should banish that hateful word "ho" from the language.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/04/09/AR2007040901003.html?nav=hcmodule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like to see peole like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity held accountable for THEIR hate-speak
I've heard much worse being spewed by Limbaugh on an almost daily basis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TOhioLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Indeed...
...wasn't it 'Mr.' Limbaugh that called Obama a 'halfrican-American'? I'm no fan of Imus, but if we're holding him to a certain standard, shouldn't it apply to all? Or is this another case of IOKIYAR (It's OK if you're a Republican)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoFlaJet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-10-07 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's exactly what it is
so it's OK for Cheney to go on rascist Limbaugh's show any time he wants to spew HIS own brand of intolerance and lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC