Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Afghanistan is now Obama's War"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:05 AM
Original message
Poll question: "Afghanistan is now Obama's War"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good poll Stinky, and I'm not sure I have an answer yet.
Must ponder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ponder the latest developments
Death rate, new offensives, and troop escalations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I have, don't like any of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Consider ......
........ but do not think **any** of what I'll post below as my opinion.

The war was started by Bush. He fucked it up wen he ignored it and redirected everything to Iraq. In the intervening years, whatever gains we made early on were lost ...... except for Mayor Karzai being protected and a few hotels kept open in Kabul. Now that Obama is in, he is calling for action that will end things there.

I am making that case, but do NOT call it my view of the subject. I am simply presenting a prevailing argument that is counter to your view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I absolutely understand and actually applaud his resolve to an extent
I just don't believe that any "surge" or new offensive or committment will ever actually "end things there". Not if, as it has already, it will leave us with a Korea-esqe presense in the region. Permanent bases are no way to try to prove to the world you're not an empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. His 'Resolve" will end poorly
It is a Bottomless Rat Hole. For money, lives and respect.

His Permanent Puppet the Mayor of Kabul is a laughing stock

God help the NEW Gold Star Mothers. There are soon to be a lot more of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. I fear you're right saigon68
And there aren't too many people, if any, on here whose opinion on such matters I respect more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm inclined to vote yes
He is Commander in Chief and he has decided to try to "win" instead of simply withdrawing which all logic and history tells us we should have done, probably right after Tora Bora.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. any war belongs to the current president unless they end it.....imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not to argue ......
.... but there's still time on the clock. Your statement can only apply to a current president and an inherited war after the president leaves office. Right now today, there is no way to say he will or won't be successful in ending it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Other: it is OUR war, and we need quality information as to our goals
and purposes for fighting it.

We need a mission statement, which we then can decide on.

Is our mission to destroy Al Queda and the Taliban, and we will leave when that's accomplished?

Is our misison to create democracy in Afghanistan?

Is our mission to secure pipeline routes for US corporations, regardless of who is in power?

If we don't know why we are there, how will we know when we are done?

This is OUR war and WE have to decide why, or if, we fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
10. Its our country - our war and we are still picking up the pieces of
Bush's mismanagement. If you were a doctor and a patient with cancer had been mistreated and now the disease was likely to be terminal and you took over the care of the patient. She or he would be your patient but you are not responsible for all that went before because you care for the patient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. That is an absolutey valid argument
What is happening there now is what is happening. While the outcome is no more or less certain than it has been, at least someone is paying it serious attention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curtland1015 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. +1... very well put.
It is Obama's war now, but he really can't be held responsible (yet...) for the state of things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. That's true to a degree
but if the cancer patient comes to you with a pack a day smoking habit and lung cancer and your medical advice is that they should increase their smoking to two packs a day ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Reminds me of Europe's attitude toward the "elections" of Dubya
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 12:48 PM by RufusTFirefly
I think that many Europeans, although they justifiably feared and detested Bush, were much more forgiving of Americans in general when they realized that the Dim Son cheated his way into office. But in 2004, we had a chance to correct a massive miscarriage of democracy and didn't. And with that, Europeans were a little less forgiving. Fool me once...

Laying waste to an entire country in pursuit of a dialysis-encumbered bogey man and rogue CIA asset is an act of unspeakable violence and supreme international arrogance. But in the heat of the moment immediately after 9/11 it is perhaps understandable that we weren't thinking as clearly as we should have been. But it's 8 years later now and we can see that "war" for what it is. Obama's policy shows we have learned very little in that time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. A kick to overcome the unrecs
Quite a few anonymous (fucking cowardly) unrecs here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. now it's OUR war
(we who voted for Obama)

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Other: In transition
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 01:57 PM by Jack Rabbit
Soon it will be Obama's war.

The situation may be beyond salvation (Bush's war), but, if that is the case, it would be Obama's responsibility to withdraw. Obama is committed to fighting the Taliban/al Qaida in Afghanistan and Pakistan, making the judgment that the war effort can be salvaged, thus making it his war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kiva Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. It became Obama's war when he chose to expand the troop
level and 'win'- and yes, I know he campaigned on this but it doesn't mean we need to agree with that choice. Iraq=Bush's war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's America's war.
Edited on Sat Jul-18-09 02:34 PM by GreenArrow
Obama gets to assume responsibility for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. It is. In the same way that LBJ's war became Nixon's war.
And, the strategy now is the same. "Peace with honor" in an unwinnable and arguably lost war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
21. Lets try One More Crusade.
Maybe it will work this time.
Maybe a White, Western, Christian army CAN successfully Occupy & Dominate a Middle Eastern Muslim country. We now have Predator Drones and bigger bombs, so lets give it a try.

I heard that new Multi-Billion Dollar Crusader Castle is quite a peach.
Lets see those nasty "Moslems" topple THAT!
God has decreed that we bring Western Capitalism to the Middle East!
All hail Hamid Karzai and the puppet US Government in Kabul.

As long as there is an American Tank on the streets of Kabul, there will never be a free election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
22. It's becoming Obama's 'Nam. The war dead count is on the rise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
24. K&R -- we need more than 24 hours to rec a thread . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Serenades Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
25. Go ahead one step
It's true but I would say it's AMERICA'S War. We're not exactly demanding our representatives to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
27. Obama’s war
Obama’s war
17 July 2009

...

A telling indicator of the violence that is being employed against the Afghan people came last week from the US Air Force, which reported that it had dropped 437 bombs on Afghanistan in June. Close-air support missions flown thus far in 2009 by US warplanes had risen to 17,420 by the end of June, the Air Force command reported. This compares to 19,092 for all of 2008.

...

The only reason left for what is now clearly Obama’s war is the real and original one—the utilization of American military might to assert Washington’s dominance over the oil-rich and geo-strategically vital region of Central Asia.

The American military brass is openly lobbying for more troops to accomplish this aim. The implications of these demands were made clear Thursday when Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he is considering a proposal to increase the size of the US Army by 30,000 soldiers in order to relieve the stress caused by the Afghanistan buildup and the continued US occupation of Iraq.

There could be no clearer indictment of the Obama administration. Brought into office on a wave of antiwar sentiment, his administration is preparing to expand the US military in order to prosecute a dirty and protracted colonial war. Meanwhile, the country’s top military commanders exert their considerable influence over the government even more directly and openly than under the Bush administration.

...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2009/jul2009/pers-j17.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-18-09 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
28. He didn't start it but it his war to now clean up and end.
If * would have kept the troop levels high and went in and cleaned out the Taliban and OBL we would have been out. That didn't happen and we have a mess....

Now having said that and understanding the Afghanastan region no invader has ever won, Russia got their asses handed to them by the Taliban because the US armed and trained OBL. Guess in hindsite that wasn't such a smart move but I never really hear anyone talking about that too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC