Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Montel Williams AGAINST Single Payer - Yes he says it won't pay Specialist enough and it is too slow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:30 AM
Original message
Montel Williams AGAINST Single Payer - Yes he says it won't pay Specialist enough and it is too slow
Edited on Mon May-18-09 10:35 AM by 1776Forever
I was extremely surprised when I heard Montel Williams on Sunday Morning on Air America radio on a pod cast with someone who said he was an "expert" in the health insurance field and a woman (sorry I didn't catch her name) who was a Nurse and an advocate for single-payer. The "expert" and Montel both spoke against the Nurse as she tried her best to get her thoughts across and couldn't because Montel and the so-called "expert" tore her apart with their "facts" that European Socialized Medicine (which they continually associated with Single-Payer) was not a good system and took way to long to get the care the patients needed, AND the other main point they made was that Specialist weren't paid enough in this system to get them to be involved in it.

Now I do know that Montel goes to Sweden a lot for his MS care, but what I wonder is how much does he know what happens now in HMO's here in the U.S.? Many current Medicaid State HMO run systems, like the one in Florida, are terribly short of any good Specialists for MS, Parkinson's, or many other chronic illnesses! My son had to go to State Run Medical Center to get the help he needed because the HMO Specialist were to say the least incompetent! And I have personally done research on why the HMO's couldn't get better Specialist and the Specialist themselves told me it was because they weren't paid enough under HMO's. So where does that leave us? If you are in fairly good health HMO's are fine. BUT if you or your loved ones go under HMO Heath Insurance and become or are currently chronically ill - Good Luck! These HMO's are only in it for the $$$$$!

I have tried to get my idea of the State Run Medical Centers becoming "triage's" for these chronically ill patients and then they could help give suggestions to the HMO specialists if it comes to what looks like is the "plan" now. I am very afraid for chronically ill patients as it looks like the Obama Administration Health Care advocates are stressing well-care in order to keep patients well but what if a person gets one of these issues that are either hereditary or not foreseen?

This is why I believe Single-Payer Advocates need to be at the table! The chronically ill I believe do not have an advocate at that table and they are the "least of these" that President Obama has referenced many times in his messages. Who is speaking for them Mr. President?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't Montel basically work for big pharma?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah, he has ads all over the place that I don't listen to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. It looks more and more like he is owned by them doesn't it? I for one am disappointed!
Edited on Mon May-18-09 10:40 AM by 1776Forever
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Which in his ads they always refer to as "America's Pharmeceutical Research Companies"
Of course they spend more on marketing than on research so they should really be called America's Pharmeceutical Marketing Companies because that's what they really are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. He's a rich man who doesn't want to wait in line
with the peasants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. Is it possible to be a liberal and not support single payer?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yes. I like the idea of single payer, but it's not going to happen
Obama never ran on the idea of a Canadian style single payer program. He will have a program which allows people who like there insurance (and there are lots of people who actually do) to keep it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Looks like Obama did run on it before he didn't run on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coyote_Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thank you for posting that link
I've got it bookmsrked now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Your welcome. Obama sound like a he was a strong advocate of
single payer, before he wasn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
22. One thing..
I don't understand why we always get the 'the Canadian system' thing. If the Canadian system or British system or Swedish system do not operate the way we would like them to why not start with those as a framework for discussion and then try to adjust the system so it will work the way we want it too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:31 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. I don't get it either
That kind of thinking requires too much common sense I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #22
40. True. The advantage of being the last western country to provide healthcare to everyone
is that we can look at all the other systems, see what works and what doesn't and hopefully create a really great system.

If we could just get rid of the insurance executives and campaign bribes it might happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
35. 'Those who like there (sic) insurance' will be able to keep it
if they really want to after finding out they get the same services for less money under single payer.

Private insurance skims 30% of what you pay right off the top - it is the biggest, most successful and most profitable scam in the history of fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. As stated I think it is not single-payer but chronically ill patients that are in question.
It has been stated over and over that no one will HAVE to join Single-Payer but there should be a choice to be able to have this type of insurance also. My husband is retired military and we have TriCare and it is very good in my estimation. Why not something like that which I know is run by HealthNet, in the South region and run by Humana Federal Service in the North region? I don't see why it has to be omitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Sure, I'm just not one of them.
I see the insurers need to make profit and the hospitals' need to conduct themselves like a busniss with billing, advertising etc. as part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
19. Greedy health insurers are a big reason why are health system is failing.
Edited on Mon May-18-09 11:03 AM by avaistheone1
I don't think the CEOs of those companies deserve multi-million dollar salaries and in some cases the CEOs have even received billions of dollars in salary. At the same time we have some of poorest health outcomes in morbidity and mortality in the developed world while paying the highest costs for insurance.

The health insurance system in this country is broken. It doesn't work. Many of us are getting poor paying as much as a mortgage payment for health insurance, while others go into bankruptcy even with health insurance due to medical bills that are not covered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Who signs his paycheck? I wouldn't expect anything different from him, he's a shill.
I didn't know he sought much of his care in Sweden. That makes him a glaring hypocrite too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. There are wonderful MS care Specialist in Sweden. I don't blame him there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
10. The idea isn't even before Congress...
...and this idiot is rejecting single-payer based on an objection to a fee schedule that has not even been formulated yet?

I've seen a few of this guy's shows and considering the crap he will accept as reliable, he pretty much has no credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Exactly - How does he know if it isn't on the "table" what the payment will be.
Can't be worse then HMO's! I had a CEO of one of the biggest HMO's tell me they paid .20 cents on the dollar what these same Specialists could get from other insurance or cash money payments. No wonder they don't want to take care of those who are in the most need and have the least money to pay for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
able1 Donating Member (97 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:52 AM
Response to Original message
13. If you're rich, you don't care about single-payer

M.W. doesn't have to work about medical insurance. His employers probably provide the fines medical insurance available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. Looks that way - That he doesn't care about the chronically ill doesn't it.
I am very disappointed as I really thought he cared about this issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
16. Why should he care? He has SAG and other insurances,
Plus he has been OWNED by the Pharma companies for YEARS. Yeah Montel, you can afford your medical marijuana -- f*ck everyone else. Air America needs to DROP this sumbitch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. he's a shill for big pharma so this is not surprising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
23. Only Montel deserves the best. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. I lost a lot of respect for him after I heard him say this. He was adamant & wouldn't budge!
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
25. Show me the money
The proposition that we can't have single payer because some doctor won't make enough money is ridiculous. That point makes me even more to have it be a system where either the doctor signs on or they are banned from practicing. If a person became a doctor solely because they could make a lot of money I really wish they would find a new profession. Peoples health, and I mean every citizen not just the rich, is important and should not be seen as just another way to make the big bucks. Until we see this as a right and not a privilege we, again meaning every citizen from cradle to grave, will never have the system we need or deserve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. Very well said - I think the Dr's deserve a good living wage but we the people deserve quality HC!
I don't see why we can't have both. 80% of our Health Care is spent on the chronically ill patients so lets just make sure they are taken care of in a responsible way. This is why I think my idea about using our State Run Medical Centers as a focal point to give out direction to those Specialist who join up with these other insurance providers makes good sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HelenWheels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
27. Lack of specialists even with good insurance
My daughter has very good insurance and had a real problem finding someone in our area that specializes in Asperger's Syndrome to treat her son.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. Yes all those "orphan" illnesses are in need of more support!
http://www.medterms.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=11418

Orphan disease: A disease which has not been "adopted" by the pharmaceutical industry because it provides little financial incentive for the private sector to make and market new medications to treat or prevent it.

An orphan disease may be:

1. A rare disease. According to US criteria, an orphan disease is one that affects fewer than 200,000 people. (There are more than 5,000 such rare disorders.)
2. A common disease that has been ignored (such as tuberculosis, cholera, typhoid, and malaria) because it is far more prevalent in developing countries than in the developed world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
28. Medicare pays even less than many HMOs so...
that would somehow be better? And the contracted HMOs you speak of are paying Medicaid rates, which might be worse than Medicare.

And "single payer" here might end up with an expansion of contracting with insurers and HMOs just as Medicare and Medicaid are doing now-- hurting those with presently good plans while not helping the rest out all that much.

Ultimately, it's not a question of single payer vs something else, but trying to change to a system where everyone gets basic primary care and other systems are set up for major medical problems, long-term chronic problems, hospice care...

Who pays for it is the least of the problems. WHAT they pay is the real problem.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #28
30. It has been stated over and over that no one will HAVE to join Single-Payer
...... but there should be a choice to be able to have this type of insurance also. My husband is retired military and we have TriCare and it is very good in my estimation. Why not something like that which I know is run by HealthNet, in the South region and run by Humana Federal Service in the North region? I don't see why it has to be omitted. We need to get everyone at the table to work this out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. That's pretty much what's on the table now, if...
some Senators can have their arms twisted enought to go along. At least two hundred million people in the country have pretty good health care and no program so far suggested seems to be able to improve it for them. Some might make it a little cheaper, but no ones knows if that will affect the level of care. What's needed is to improve the level of care for the rest of us and find ways to reduce the basic costs of care.

As I mentioned in a thread last week that died a horrible death, my Congressman, Tim Bishop, held a town hall at a retirement community and said plan that had the best chance of passing was the government option in addition to existing healthcare schemes. Strong regulation of health insurance companies (similiar to state regulation of auto insurance comapanies) would probably be included.

I've been covered under excellent employer plans, lousy HMOs, had no coverage at all, and am now "covered" by the VA. If possible, I'd go back to the employer plans in a heartbeat. The VA is better than the worst of the HMOs in some ways, but there are no second opinions or options in treatment. I'm also in a class that gets treatment "as long as the money lasts." So far, it's lasted and Congress is actually united in additional VA funding.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
33. he who has $.
forget all the people with MS wo have a 'pre-existing condition'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
34. We can't have the state rationing health care!
That's your HMO's job!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
37. It will cost you at least 30% for that privilege too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. Isn't he the guy who appears in all those "hey Big Pharma just wants to help" ads? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Yes and I heard him today saying all we have to do about torture
is admit it happened and announce we'll never do it again. Seriously - that's his position on it.

I'm sure the world will believe us when we promise to be good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
38. So the guy who sold phony Obama coins opinion actually counts for something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. The issue is bigger to me because Montel has MS & has said for years he wants to help others with it
So when I heard him say these things I was really amazed. I mean I could have believed him more if he had allowed some middle ground but he "ate" up the Nurse who supported single-payer on his Air America Show and it just surprised me. I guess he showed his true colors and I am very disappointed in his attitude. But it did give me an incite into why the Obama Administration Health Care Rep's may be shutting out single-payer. I posted about Sen. Baucus getting most of his money and more then any other Rep from the pharmaceutical and insurance companies. No surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-18-09 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. We already are slow and don't have enough specialists.
And many specialists are complaining already that they don't make enough (most doctors's wages have been fairly stagnant for years, according to Medical Economics magazine's annual polls). We have that with the system we have now, so how would it be different under single payer?

My son needed to get an upper endoscopy today (second time of puking blood, long-term acid reflux). I was told to take him to the ER so he could get scoped. They couldn't fit him in today--the specialist who commutes from two hours away one half day a week wasn't in today and couldn't do it tomorrow, either. Now they're trying to fit him in before August when the new doctor comes (who will still only be doing procedures one-half day a week). This is with good insurance at a good children's hospital serving a huge area in Michigan.

Montel needs to get off Pharma's soma machine and wake the hell up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #39
43. If you live near a larger city call your Dr. & see if they will approve you going there.
I had these symptom's in my 30's and they found out I was born with a kidney defect. I almost died from it. Not saying your Son has this problem but it could be something like that so it is very important to get him looked at soon. Best of luck to you and him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. They called this morning, and they're getting him in on the 12th.
I was asked if I was okay with taking him over an hour away to UofM, and I was, but I shouldn't have to drive across the state for such a simple, common procedure.

I'm just sayin'--those who think that our system works well enough obviously live in huge urban centers with big, academic hospitals and lots of money and fancy insurance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-19-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
45. Bullshit...single would be exactly the same as Medicaid has been for hundreds of millions of people
of Americans since 1965 (even used by tens of millions of republicans, who say they hate it) - Because it a liberal program like social Security that works!

Meaning ALL would be covered the same way under single payer!...single payer Universal Health Care for ALL!

Williams doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC