|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Danascot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:42 PM Original message |
Swine Flu Cure ... Cannabis! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:47 PM Response to Original message |
1. Wow. Argue that, or try it. There ya go. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:48 PM Response to Original message |
2. this may be totally legit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:57 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. You're not casting any asparaguses on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 07:03 AM Response to Reply #2 |
40. Where have you been? News stories about cannabis curing, treating and preventing disease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
realisticphish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:58 PM Response to Reply #40 |
60. ignorant implies I haven't known any stoners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
3. NORML National Marijuana Forum Part B - Dr. Robert Melamede - CU Boulder 2009 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
4. K&R. Will the panic over a possible pandemic change attitudes about using cannabis-based medicine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Why would it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
23. IMO, the best way to eliminate fear over marijuana is to demonstrate its medicinal properties. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:52 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Sure. I'm well aware that "medical marijuana" is a brilliant trojan horse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 11:03 PM Response to Reply #25 |
27. However, it has been proven to have medical benefits in some instances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 11:09 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Sure it would make money for 'em. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 11:19 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. So why haven't they done it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:49 PM Response to Reply #28 |
51. You have heard of Marinol, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:53 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Yep. Cannabis works in complex ways. It's obvious that synthetic THC isn't nearly as effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:03 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Or we could just smoke it or eat it in baked goods. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:08 PM Response to Reply #55 |
57. Nothing wrong with doing that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 03:52 PM Response to Reply #57 |
58. I hear what you're saying. And I have nothing against the for-profit system per se. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nichomachus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 04:58 PM Response to Reply #51 |
59. Never made me more nauseous n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femrap (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:42 PM Response to Reply #23 |
50. I think a great 'eye opener' would be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doremus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:25 PM Response to Reply #4 |
21. I can think of only one scenario in which they would: if they got the flu and it helped THEM. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rhiannon12866 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:39 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Agreed. Or that medical marijuana was the only thing that helped a dying loved one. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Cannabis Science to the rescue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. hahahah! Potheads never met an issue they won't exploit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:02 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. One of my favorite panels from a webcomic, ever: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. hahahah! Nice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Great news |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
killbotfactory (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 11:22 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. Those damn, dirty potheads! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:01 AM Response to Reply #6 |
36. Legalize it and we'll stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrownPrinceBandar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
56. Oh snap. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cronus Protagonist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:57 AM Response to Reply #6 |
37. What a damn fucking downer you are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
7. Yes, I'm pretty sure a pot company would claim pot alleviates any and all problems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 09:59 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I think you need to do some research |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:04 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. I think Cannabis Science should do some research first. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:05 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. I wasn't referring to "Cannabis Science" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:06 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I'm sorry, I assumed you were, since that's what this thread is about. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:10 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. I was referring to the science of cannabis |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:11 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. I was referring to Cannabis Science, Inc., and its press release detailing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aethertek (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 11:51 PM Response to Reply #18 |
31. Try it you'll like it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 12:01 AM Response to Reply #31 |
33. no doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aethertek (46 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 12:07 AM Response to Reply #33 |
34. Tease |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:36 AM Response to Reply #31 |
45. I have. Not a huge fan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:45 AM Response to Reply #31 |
49. Was thinking the same. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crikkett (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 07:09 AM Response to Reply #18 |
42. you go on and on and say nothing, as if repeating yourself will make that nothing true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:39 AM Response to Reply #42 |
47. No, I say a rather particular something: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jberryhill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
26. No, it's backed up by studies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cbc5g (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 07:05 AM Response to Reply #7 |
41. And I'm sure some dude on a bulletin board will laugh at the claims |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Occam Bandage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:35 AM Response to Reply #41 |
44. Until they have any evidence for them, sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Union Yes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
15. If this is true then I'm immune. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parasim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
19. Nice. So I'm good to go then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Apr-27-09 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
24. that shitty mexican weed doesn't seem to be all that effective... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seemslikeadream (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 12:00 AM Response to Reply #24 |
32. Who doesn't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
35. Would this be the thread to suggest aggressive placement of seeds in silos, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 05:47 AM Response to Original message |
38. It doesn't make you any better.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 06:09 AM Response to Original message |
39. I've smoked a lot of pot since I was about 17 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EOTE (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 02:00 PM Response to Reply #39 |
54. For me, it's bronchitis. Haven't had it in about 12 years. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ganja Ninja (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 07:53 AM Response to Original message |
43. It may not be a cure but it certainly can't hurt. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bamacrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
46. Awesome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftyladyfrommo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
48. Yea. And if you are sick you won't care. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lunatica (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-28-09 01:49 PM Response to Original message |
52. The many uses of pot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC