Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Umm, the Spanish AG does not have the last word on Bush 6 indictments.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 10:24 PM
Original message
Umm, the Spanish AG does not have the last word on Bush 6 indictments.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/world/europe/17spain.html

PARIS — Spain’s attorney general on Thursday strongly criticized steps to open a criminal investigation in Madrid into allegations that six former Bush administration officials authorized the torture of detainees at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.

Cándido Conde-Pumpido, the attorney general, said at a breakfast meeting with journalists in Madrid that he would oppose any legal action in Spain because the proper forum would be an American court and that any investigation should focus on those who actually mistreated detainees.

But in Spain, the attorney general does not have the last word; an investigating judge decides whether a case will proceed. Lawyers familiar with the case said that the stage had now apparently been set for a struggle between judges and politicians.

(snip)

Gonzalo Boye, the lawyer for the human rights group that filed the complaint in March, dismissed the attorney general’s arguments as “legal nonsense.” He said that in Spain as in most countries, legal advisers can be held accountable for bending or breaking the law. It was not known when Judge Garzón would issue his decision on how he plans to proceed. Lawyers said the case could still be assigned to a different judge.

(end snip)

So, the Spanish AG is full of horse puckey?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-16-09 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. It might be wise for Judge Garzon
to stay out of small airplanes while this matter is pending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-17-09 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kick for the sunshine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC