Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox News’s Brit Hume Warns That Because Of Blogs, Future News Will Be ‘More Partisan’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:43 PM
Original message
Fox News’s Brit Hume Warns That Because Of Blogs, Future News Will Be ‘More Partisan’
Fox News’s Brit Hume Warns That Because Of Blogs, Future News Will Be ‘More Partisan’

Last night, the conservative Media Research Center, which houses the ever on point NewsBusters blog, hosted its annual “DisHonors” media awards gala in Washington, D.C. Aside from the cornier “Media Messiah” and “Obamagasm” media honors the group bestowed to alleged “liberal” members of the press, MRC presented Fox News’s Brit Hume with its “William F. Buckley Jr. Award for Media Excellence.” In his acceptance speech, Hume warned of the dangers of the rise of blogs and news being “presented from one political viewpoint”:

HUME: What are we getting?…We’re getting bloggers and websites and all sorts of individual entrepreneurs, and we have a vaster menu of choices today than we’ve ever had. But I think that we also have the danger that everything will be presented from one political viewpoint or the other, and that the media that confront us are going to be more partisan than ever — which means that the Media Research Center will have a mission for many years to come, and a good thing that is.

Hume’s warning is rather odd because in the very same speech, he thanked the MRC — an unabashedly conservative outfit — for feeding him information for his reports as anchor of Fox News’s Special Report:

HUME: I want to say a word, however, of thanks, to Brent and to the team at the Media Research Center and all the contributors who make that work there possible. <…> also for the tremendous amount of material that the Media Research Center provided me for so many years when I was anchoring Special Report. I don’t know what we would have done without them. It was a daily, sort of a buffet of material to work from, and we — we — we certainly made tremendous use of it.

But if anyone would know anything about reporting from a certain political point of view, it is Brit Hume. During this past presidential campaign, Hume (perhaps unknowingly) took part in the right wing campaign to paint Barack Obama as a Muslim — first suggesting that Obama had previously practiced Islam and later falsely claiming that Obama’s brother “is not sure sure” Barack is Christian.

Moreoever, Hume has claimed that al-Qaeda in Iraq “was there before we got there,” that “the problem” with the Walter Reed affair was that it looked bad for former President Bush, and that Democrats “are kind of embarrassed by patriotism.” He recently said Bush put American on an “amazing” foreign policy path. And over the years, Hume’s reports have routinely contained conservative misinformation, especially on global warming and the Valerie Plame CIA leak scandal.

<more>

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/20/hume-warns-media-mrc/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. One thing
I can't stand about alleged "media critic" Howard Kurtz is that he constantly complains about MSNBC's "liberal bias", but he once claimed that Brit Hume was non partisan. Whatever, dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well, blogs became more partisan because cable news became partisan first!
Edited on Fri Mar-20-09 05:46 PM by Deja Q
And then they claimed bloggers were speaking empty nonsense and gibber.

If that is the case, then why does unbalanced tabloid "news" need to become even more unbalanced?

Hume, don't fume. Please. For the sake of the children, don't fume, Hume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Who let that idiot out again?
go buy some stock Brit. Make some money on other people's crises. And stay away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. shut down fox "news" and it will become immediately much less partisan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. yes,only corporate ownership by one huge conglomerate can ensure
a fair and balanced viewpont like Fox's.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. Brit Hume warns that the MSM will lose control of their ability
......to deliver pro-corporate news to a sizable audience due to blogs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. he says that now because the Progressive View Point is more abundant
He had no problem with the internet when conservos seemed to be in the majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this a Freudian Slip acknowledging his own partisanship?
"we — we — we."

Did his conscious argue with his subconscious about using that word in context of his speech?:shrug:

These and other questions can probably never be answered, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
9. I normally don't use this language, but: FUCK YOU BRIT HUME! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. LOL! Cool! The Stupidest Thing Fox Could Do
Is become more partisan. But this reaction is not surprising considering the "conservative/repub" mindset; Never admit amistake, never change course and if its not working that means you need even MORE of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. That's rich, coming from Fox.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. DUH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. In other news, Pepe Le Pew complains about the stench coming from Fox News n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-20-09 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
14. Too bad that Hume's son wasn't a fan of that whole murder-suicide thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC