FORGET 911!!! It's NOT IMPORTANT! What IS important is...

[LynnTheDem]

George W. bUsh & the Republic Party haven't had ANOTHER 911 attack happen on their watch!!!
















Now imagine if 911 had happened with a (D) president who tried catapulting this propaganda bullshit...

[wildbilln864]

1. k&r ! nt

[B o d i]

2. Well, 9/11/01 was on Clinton's watch, after all

(I hope I don't need to post the sarcasm tag or the 8/6/01 PDB etc)

[Joe the Liberal]

3. I know huh?..........

9/11 is irrelevant, don't look over there, look over here, what is of the utmost importance is that there has not been an attack on the US since then. :sarcasm:

Seriously though, it was bad enough that an attack like that happened in the first place. Now they are trying to make it look like it happened during another presidents time in the White House and not during Bush's. It's similar to how they are trying to rewrite history with the "New Deal was a failure and prolonged the depression" nonsense.

They can't change history, 9/11 happened during a Republican presidency that is FACT. If it happened during a Democrats presidency I can't even begin to imagine what they would be saying right now.

[intheflow]

4. They did have another attack.

It was called Katrina. They had a week's clear notice and still did nothing. If this administration couldn't handle advance warning about a major catastrophe, why would anyone believe they'd keep us safe during another surprise attack? :crazy:

[proud2BlibKansan]

5. There were also the anthrax attacks.

[coruscate]

8. That's rhetoric but the anthrax attacks are not

The Anthrax attacks, were attacks and were certainly real.

Not lessening what Katrina was, but that was not a terrorist attack.

[wildbilln864]

6. We should see protest signs saying....

George W. is responsible for the deaths of 3000 Americans on his watch! But he went on vacation. :shrug:
If they couldn't imagine hijacks turned projectiles, with all the warnings. They had people around these alleged hijackers. Agents were watching them! Able frigging Danger!
Where's Bohringer?
:crazy:

[boppers]

7. Terrorism has increased under *'s watch.

A simple thing I like to remind folks of.

[BrklynLiberal]

9. His bullshit was the fertilizer for the growth of terrorism around the world.

His actions mobilized, energized and inspired virtually all the terrorism that we will have to deal with for the next generation

[Fovea]

10. It didnt make any sense when Gaffney said it last night.

But Frank Gaffney is so full of crap, after a colonic, you could mail what's left for less than a dollar.

[Vickers]

11. When a repuke says this I mention Madrid trains, London Underground, India Parliament,

Tunisia, Morocco, Saudi Arabia (Riyahd Compound), Karbala, Baghdad (hotel bombings), etc. etc.

When they say, but that wasn't in America!, I reply

AND NEITHER WAS THE USS COLE YOU FUCK-KNOB.

You can't have it both ways.

:eyes:

[reggie the dog]

12. Madrid?

[Vickers]

14. In 2004 bombs were set off on trains in Madrid, killing 191 and wounding 1,755.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/11_March_2004_Madrid_train_bombings

[reggie the dog]

15. Doh!

how in the hell did I forget about that.

[spanone]

13. they would have impeached for that alone....cause it happened on their watch

[stuntcat]

16. right?

George Bush protected us by starting a wasteful never-ending war in the MidEast :eyes: which was exactly what the purpose of 9/11 was!
The terrorists succeeded in wasting our military and blowing our image in the world.

Thanks shitbrain Bush.

[I814U]

17. If the neocons can have 9/11 to start their war on humanity...

...you better believe they can use it--or merely the threat of it--to push Obama around into agreeing with their policiy goals.

Don't believe me? Whence comes this foreign policy nightmare Obama is proposing?