Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$300,000,000,000 = 4,000,000 X $75,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:46 AM
Original message
$300,000,000,000 = 4,000,000 X $75,000
300 billion dollars

That is all it would take to put 4 million people to work @ $75,000/year.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
1. For one year, and then what?
It actually requires capital investment of much more than $75,000 to create a job that lasts indefinitely. Capital investment per employee varies considerably by industry, but it is generally in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. I am talking govt. jobs.
EPA inspectors, CPS inspectors, border patrol agents, etc.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. And then another $350,000,000,000 the next year.
And then $400,000,000,000 and then $500,000,000,000 and ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yes. If that is what it takes to rebuild our TOTALLY FUCKED UP ECONOMY.
Would you rather piss away $300 BILLION on a useless war.

Who exactly benefits from that??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #5
13. But still for only one year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. 5, 10, 20 Who knows. Would you rather spend 300 billion on a war
to benefit a few thousand in the MIC, or use that money to
employ 4,000,000 people at a livable wage??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
37. No, but spending X billion dollars to hire bureaucrats
does nothing for me. The produce nothing. We need steel workers, auto worker, miners, loggers, truck drivers, farmers. Giving X Billion to X million
works for a short time but does not produce real wealth. Whow do you propose to start up the mills, factorys, shops, sides etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's also the amount of interest we pay on the debt every year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That used to be the amount when our debt was only 9 trillion
It has gone up by a couple of trillion since then..Imagine if all of a sudden we started seeing some real inflation...Say interest rates jumped to three percent or four percent..or heaven forbide as they were in the seventies, eighteen percent..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. -
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 11:06 AM by RUMMYisFROSTED
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I'm thinking it is half of the interest we pay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. But After The Bankers Get Their Share, Only 100B Left
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 10:54 AM by MannyGoldstein
So maybe 1.3 million jobs. Although the bankers will hire people to clean the pool, etc, so perhaps a few more jobs.

Also, if $300B a year is as insufficient as Paul Krugman argues, then we may have deflation, which will cause the Predator Class to pare spending, which will also reduce jobs quite a lot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. These are govt. jobs. Screw the bankers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #7
20. *You* Are Not Getting A Holiday Card From Chucky Schumer This Year
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 11:44 AM by MannyGoldstein
If a large portion didn't go to help the bankers, then what would it say about our government? About our way of life?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I don't expect one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InkAddict Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
8. Doncha think that's a little simplistic....
I mean, what are they to do...manufacturing has gone to China; customer service has gone to India; financials are hiding in the Caymans. Putting thousands in reflective vests staring down holes in the roads doesn't seem viable either because they're untrained to do that.

Oh, and don't forget the approximate 33% tax rebate back to the benefactor, Uncle Sam, for military services rendered in occupied lands.

However, out of this 3-person household, you can sign two of them up as job-site surfing "Economic Stimulators" and bring on those bi-weekly checks.

Yup, that'll work! Maybe I can go to the doctor, dentist, and get new glasses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yes it is simplistic. That is the whole point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #8
16. Simple doesn't mean simplistic.
Unlike the bank bailout, for instance, $300 directly to citizens would create a great many jobs among those who provide goods and services to the recipients.

How about some trickle up economics? It would have to work better than what we've been doing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. 75K??
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 11:07 AM by progressoid
gonna give them more money than most of the country makes?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. It's just a number I chose to make the math easy for the # challenged
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 11:19 AM by dkofos
If you want to work for less, that's fine with me.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
18. what about taxes and benefits?
Shouldn't the cost of an employee be a little higher than what they make?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. And your point is??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. just that the amount would be more?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I guess I could change my numbers to make you happy.
But I won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
19. Did you know that if you made it rain with $1 bills
Edited on Sat Jan-10-09 11:33 AM by NOW tense
and they landed perfectly next to each other that $300 billion dollars would cover 1,198.57 square miles. That is if my calculations are correct.

Make it Rain! Make it Rain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. I see you missed the point completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. No I got the point
I just dork out on numbers sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Did you know, that is roughly the size of Rhode Island??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I tried Delaware and New Jersey then gave up.
I guess money doesn't really go as far as we would like it to and that is my point. Giving 4 million people jobs for a year doesn't really go that far. It sounds big until you look at it on a map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. But making those 4 million jobs permanent would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOW tense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. It would I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. I think that is a great goal.
It would enable peole to do good works for the nation and pull thamselves out of poverty.I would like to see maybe half of that translated to jobs that paid $45,000 a year for unskilled/semi-skilled labor to help the truly poor pull themselves up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. We need to replace the 3 million jobs that bush lost. This would be a good start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
33. why don't we just declare chapter 7 and get it over and done with already...?
push the reset button and bring back the tariffs and the manufacturing...before china can actually do much about it.


oops...too late. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. I don't see how that would help us or the rest of the world.
What we need is a $2 trillion redistribution of wealth.

Tax the FILTHY RICH, which will leave them only STINKING RICH,
and push the money back in at the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
34. For one year. And if you can't find anything productive for them to do,
you've done nothing that simply printing an extra three hundred billion wouldn't have done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-10-09 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Not just for one year, PERMANENT. And I expect actual productive
work to be done. I bet if you think about it for five minutes
even you could come up with a list of jobs eliminated under bush
that we really need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC