Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Lawmaker in Kentucky Mixes Piety and Politics

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:19 PM
Original message
NYT: Lawmaker in Kentucky Mixes Piety and Politics
LOUISVILLE, Ky. — Tom Riner looks for God everywhere, and in places he does not find him, he tries to put him there.

For more than 30 years, Mr. Riner’s singular devotion has been to inject God into the public arena. It has guided him as he preached the Bible in the countryside of Nicaragua and Jamaica. And it steers him as he proselytizes the formerly homeless and drug-addicted people who live with him at his ramshackle church in one of the poorest sections of this city.

But this unrelenting mission has also frequently taken Mr. Riner and the Kentucky legislature, where he has been a Democratic representative for 26 years, across the constitutional barrier between church and state.

In December, an atheist organization and a group of state residents sued Kentucky over Mr. Riner’s most recent incursion: a 2006 law he sponsored requiring that the state’s homeland security office post a plaque recognizing God’s role in keeping the country safe.

“The church-state divide is not a line I see,” Mr. Riner, a Baptist minister, said of the lawsuit.

...

Since 2002, state and local officials have spent more than $160,000 in legal fees, having lost case after case to the American Civil Liberties Union for posting the Ten Commandments in public buildings, and they still owe $400,000 for a 2005 case in which the Supreme Court ruled that such displays should be removed. Still, Mr. Riner soldiers on.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/us/04louisville.html?_r=1&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink


Contact information:

Phone Number(s)
Home: (502) 584-3639
Annex: (502) 564-8100 Ext. 606
Email Address(es)
Annex: [email protected]
http://www.lrc.ky.gov/legislator/h041.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1.  But hey, he;s a democrat and to some, that is all that counts!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Idealism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. The GOP does not have a monopoly on people who deny the Constitution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. soldiers on?.. it's an illness, I fear.
I often wonder when I meet hyper-religious people...what event(s) led them to such extreme beliefs.. Most people can manage perfectly ordinary/happy lives with some balance, and yet some people seem to always have to operate at 195% ..It almost reminds me of a manic-state.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. My e-mail to him...
I believe that each individual should be allowed to follow the dictates of his or her own conscience without influence, coercion, or direction from the State when it comes to matters of religion. I respect your wish to spread your beliefs and we would likely agree about a lot in that respect but I think that every time the government attempts to do so it hurts the very thing we wish to honor. Please consider the following:

"In 1800, some attacked, Mr. Jefferson, for his belief in church-state separation by, saying his election in 1800: 'The effects would be to destroy religion, introduce immorality and loosen all the bonds of society.' That was said about Mr. Jefferson over 200 years ago simply because he believed in the principle of church-state separation as a way to accomplish religious liberty." ~Rep. Chet Edwards before the U.S. SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON CONSTITUTION, CIVIL RIGHTS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS, June 8, 2004 Tuesday.

“But it is only proposed that I should recommend, not prescribe a day of fasting and prayer. That is, that I should indirectly assume to the United States an authority over religious exercises, which the Constitution has directly precluded them from… I do not believe it is in the best interests of religion to invite the civil magistrate to direct its exercises, its discipline, or its doctrines; nor of the religious societies, that the General Government should be invested with the power of effecting any uniformity of time or matter among them. Fasting and prayer are religious exercises; the enjoining them an act of discipline. Every religious society has a right to determine for itself the times of these exercises, and the objects proper for them, according to their own particular tenets; and this right can never be safer than in their own hands, where the Constitution has deposited it.” ~Thomas Jefferson, just before the end of his second term, in a letter to Samuel Miller--a Presbyterian minister--on January 23, 1808 ; from Willson Whitman, arranger, Jefferson's Letters, Eau Claire , Wisconsin : E. M. Hale and Company, ND, pp. 241-242.

“The number, the industry, and the morality of the Priesthood, and the devotion of the people have been manifestly increased by the total separation of the Church and the State.” ~James Madison, Father of the Constitution

Thank you,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. That's the direction the whole country's headed........
and I don't foresee the government's doing anything to prevent it.

Nauseating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I disagree, I think Obama's judicial appointees will go a long way in stopping it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-04-09 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I agree. That is why Minister have such influence.And we are "pandering" to the evangelicals.
But heck, some think as long as we "win" it doesn't matter. OTOH, I question the cost of such "winning" and wonder if anyone realises the pandering will never stop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC