Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lieberman on contraception for rape victims, not digging into the past on Iraq, and loyalty.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:32 PM
Original message
Lieberman on contraception for rape victims, not digging into the past on Iraq, and loyalty.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 02:21 PM by madfloridian
I think back a lot into Joe Lieberman's run against Ned Lamont. I was amazed at the number of power Democrats who came to his aid. I was amazed that even when he made up his own party to run against Lamont...many power Democrats still supported him instead of the Democratic nominee, Ned Lamont. There was a group called Dems for Joe which contained many well-known names.

It was really eye-opening. Joe Lieberman lost the primary. He flat out lost. Yet he still won his seat back. He went on to campaign not just for McCain but against Obama.

He still has his chairmanship, and he was today embraced again by his party. Just as he was when he beat the Democratic nominee Ned Lamont....he was hugged and cheered when he returned to the floor.

One Democrat spoke out against him during the campaign against Lamont. That Democrat is now leaving the party leadership and likely will not be considered for any position in the Obama administration because he is too partisan..too loyal to the party.

Loyal out, disloyal remains.

That one Democrat who spoke out during the 2006 campaign...?

Dean said Lieberman being disrespectful of the party.

"Howard Dean, the Democratic national chairman, called on Mr. Lieberman to quit the race, and in an interview said he would be disappointed in any Democratic Party leader who continued to support Mr. Lieberman, declaring they “have an obligation” to support their nominee.

But most Democrats were united in saying they would not pressure Mr. Lieberman to step aside for now, saying he was too angered by his loss to accept such counseling and noting Republicans as of now do not have a strong candidate who could take advantage of a fractured Democratic field."


Disloyalty to Holy Joe is not easily forgotten. Joe's in the fold, Howard's out.

There are two things about Joe Lieberman's tenure I remember so well. It tells not only where he is, but it shows where our party is heading.

From Jane Hamsher at Fire Dog Lake:

In Connecticut, rape counseling activists say a recent study concludes that about 20% of state hospitals routinely refuse to offer emergency contraceptives to rape victims who are determined to be ovulating at the time they're attacked. A proposed bill would require them to do so.

And what sayeth Joe Lieberman about this? According to The New Haven Register:

This fight isn't exclusively being drawn along party lines.U.S. Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, who often takes a conservative line on social issues, is facing a liberal Democratic primary challenge from wealthy Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont. But that hasn't stopped Lieberman from supporting the approach of the Catholic hospitals when it comes to contraceptives for rape victims.

Lieberman said he believes hospitals that refuse to give contraceptives to rape victims for "principled reasons" shouldn't be forced to do so. "In Connecticut, it shouldn't take more than a short ride to get to another hospital," he said.


Jane Hamsher on Lieberman


See, rape victims, just ask for a ride to another hospital...don't be so demanding. :eyes:

It also bothered me that Joe Lieberman highly praised the pastor, John Hagee, and compared him to Moses.

Of describing Pastor Hagee in the words that the Torah uses to describe Moses, he is an "Ish Elokim," a man of God and those words really do fit him; and, I'd add something else, like Moses he's become the leader of a mighty multitude, even greater than the multitude that Moses led from Egypt to the promised land.


That was at the CUFI conference where Hagee as much as declared war on Iran.

JOHN HAGEE: Iran is a clear and present danger to the survival of Israel. To the United States of America and the western the world-- western world. Therefore it is time for America to embrace the words of Senator Joseph Lieberman and consider a military preemptive strike against Iran to prevent a nuclear holocaust in Israel and a nuclear attack in America.

BILL MOYERS: On that, participants at the CUFI summit seem to agree: the times call for urgent action - even military action. Some of them believe war - and rumors of war - are part of God's plan.


Here's the part that worries me a lot now that he is being allowed to keep his chairmanships. He did not want to investigate what happened leading up to the Iraq War.

Lieberman doesn't want to to see us "digging around anymore for who did what in 2003"

At a time when this nation's partisan divide seems to be ever widening, Senator John Warner (R-VA) and Senator Joe Lieberman (D-CT) teamed up at a recent installment of the monthly Aspen Roundtable Series in Washington, DC, sponsored by the DaimlerChrysler Corporation Fund, to speak out about the critical need for bipartisan policymaking. Both senators offered foreboding predictions for the situation in Iraq if America's political setting continues to be as divided as it is currently. "I anticipate a very stressful situation unless this Government takes strong control in Iraq—120 days from now is when serious stress on where we're going to go will begin to set in," said Warner. "I don't want to see us digging around anymore for who did what in 2003," said Lieberman, stating that continued partisan finger pointing is damaging the public support that is needed to complete the efforts in Iraq and finally bring US troops home.


This could be one reason he has so much congressional support. He is not the only one who would prefer there be "no digging around" for who did what in 2003.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. I never voted for Lieberman, but reading this his icky factor went up with me.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think they put too much trust in his loyalty.
It worries me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's not quite how I remember it. Some of the Dem Senators supported him...
in the primary. But once Lieberman lost the primary, they were pretty much in step for LaMont, using the line "We will support the candidate that the people selected". Joe was out on his own on that one. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There was covert and overt support in the general
No, he was not out on his own at all. Some Dems on the surface supported Lamont, but also gave Lieberman support under the surface in various ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. CT Dem leadership supported him n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. Sadly, you're wrong. Prominent Dems even campaigned for him AFTER he jumped ship.
Then, when he returned to the Senate, they gave that fucker a standing ovation.

Unsurprising from the same crew willing to let b*s* and his fellow criminals walk.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That standing ovation was so painful.
It was like they thumbed their noses at Lamont and those of us who worked with Jim Dean and DFA to support Ned's campaign.

It really hurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
5. Dean loyal to the party still....supports decision on Lieberman.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 02:13 PM by madfloridian
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/11/howard_dean_supports_senates_l.php

"Howard Dean says that he's "fine" with the Senate's decision not to kick Joe Lieberman off the Homeland Security committee, because in his view it's what Barack Obama wanted.

In a phone interview with me just after the vote concluded, I asked Dean if he thought the Senate should keep Lieberman. He said that the Senate had acted "in the spirit of unification, which is what the President-elect wanted."

"He called the shots, and that's fine," Dean said.

Dean also cast efforts to remove Lieberman as "revenge," a description that will dismay many of Dean's allies in the liberal blogosphere, who maintain (as do I) that this wasn't solely about retribution.

"I think it's in every human being's heart to get revenge," Dean said, adding that the time had come to "swallow hard" and "put aside that kind of stuff."

Kind of sad.

He also added:

"Asked if Lieberman should keep the chairmanship given his performance at the post, Dean replied that it was up to the Senate to evaluate the job Lieberman did. "The Senate will do what the Senate does," Dean said. "It's not my place to interfere."

"They asked Senator Obama's opinion and he gave it," Dean said."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. And I disagree.
Completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly...
"...This could be one reason he has so much congressional support. He is not the only one who would prefer there be "no digging around" for who did what in 2003."








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The Democrats are loyal to him beyond all reason.
And yes, that could be playing a part.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think it definitely plays a large role, accounting for what you
stated as beyond all reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
19. I see they sent Dean out to do phone conferences with bloggers today.
Jane Hamsher at Fire Dog Lake did a good job. Dean was not that familiar with Joe's record with Homeland Security...said he had been too busy trying to win.

Shame they are using him that way.

Dean's an honest man, one I respect...they are using him.

http://firedoglake.com/2008/11/18/howard-dean-on-lieberman-i-never-looked-into-what-he-was-doing-as-the-chairman-of-the-homeland-security-committee/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Thanks for the links...
will look at them after dinner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
9. Anti-choice, pro-Hagee, anti investigating Iraq...
If Joe does it, it is fine with everyone.

How very very odd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. Since the Democratic leadership refuses to hold him accountable,
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 03:30 PM by 20score
maybe the people of Connecticut will. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
17. Doubt that he can win again in Connecticut.
In a race against a Democrat and a Republican, he is likely to be viewed as the second Republican in the race.

Very disappointed they haven't stripped him of his chairmanships. Lieberman claims he is truly independent. If he is going to vote his "conscience", as he claims, what can possibly be gained by appeasing him?

Politics is a contact sport. Failure to punish his disloyalty is a demonstration of weakness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
12. "It's what Obama wants."
Each time I read that comment, the bloom comes off the rose just a little bit more.

If this is *Change* then my fears all along will be realized that the sweep for Obama will be for naught, just as our victory in 2006 turned to ashes.

I abhor that phrase "Post-Partisan Politics," and I had to swallow hard and try to ignore it when I voted for Obama. Being enthusiastically partisan on behalf of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, and being willing to tell the truth, rather than currying favor with the guy in charge this time around, is the change I voted for.

The man who sits in the Oval Office is not a king, whose desires must be catered to. He is the servant of the people. (In our collective dreams!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's probably more what Reid and others want.....NO Investigations!
Katrina, mis-management at Homeland Security with contracts. Reid and Pelosi are determined to "put all that behind us" so the need a tough guy/traitorous type like Lieberman in a powerful position. He's the "cover up man" and the one who helped steal "2000 Election" along with other traitorous deeds we all know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Hmmm, the same folks who took impeachment off the
table
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. We're Stuck With Joe for Four More Years
And two other senate races still undecided. He simply can't be taken out with a mallet right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
16. I remember that. I pointed that out to more than a few people
who intended to vote for Lieberman during that senate race.

Disgusting. Another one of his displays of "piety". He's such a sanctimonious, selfish jerk. He really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. But he is beloved...by those who matter.
by the Democrats in power.

I am starting to feel they only need us for our votes every few years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Reminds me of this statement...
Kucinich...

"...So what I see is that the Democratic Party abandoned working people, and paradoxically they’re the ones who hoist the flag of workers every two and four years only to engender excitement, and then to turn around and abandon their constituency. This is now on the level of a practiced ritual. At least a biannual ceremony, or every two years. So you can see how pernicious this becomes when the minimum wage increase was tied to funding the war. That, to me, says it all. Because it is inevitably the sons and daughters of working Americans that are the ones who are led to slaughter..."

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080106_a_conversation_with_dennis_kucinich/



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
20. McJoan at Kos has a post up about the Dean bloggers conference
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Interesting and I'm glad someone is asking the tough questions...
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 08:17 PM by slipslidingaway


"...JANE HAMSHER: But the tone we just set, with all due respect, is that Joe's lack of oversight on the Homeland Security Committee, and his refusing to investigate Katrina to pay back the Republicans, and his refusal to look into billions and billions of dollars worth of graft and theft is okay for political considerations. I think that's the message you're sending and I don't think that's the change people voted for.

HOWARD DEAN: Well I don't think that stuff is okay but I have to say I'm not terribly familiar with his record. But you know I would agree, that's not the change we voted for, I agree with that.


JANE HAMSHER: Governor Dean, Greg Sargent just put up a post saying that you believe that the liberal blogosphere was motivated to take Joe Lieberman's gavel away because of revenge. Is that what you think this was?

HOWARD DEAN: I think some of it was anger over his behavior, certainly I have anger over his behavior.

JANE HAMSHER: But I think the larger issue here is that Joe was not qualified for the gavel they gave him, and has proved himself unqualified over the past two years.

HOWARD DEAN: Look I'm not going to a dispute with you over that, because it sounds like you know his record much better than I. I never looked into what he was doing as the Chairman of the Homeland Security Committee. I was too busy figuring out how to win the election. So I don't want to get into a debate on whether he's qualified or not.

JANE HAMSHER: But do you think that's something that the Senate should've looked at in deciding whether to give him the gavel or not?

HOWARD DEAN: Well, I hope they did.

Yes, it would have been nice if someone had looked into whether Joe was actually qualified or not to do the job before giving it to him again."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. Joe has the dirt and he knows how to use it. Just one more in a long list of reasons to dump him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Glad to hear Lamont speak out tonight...said he could not be trusted
to chair the Homeland Security dept. I really do agree with Ned.

Our Democrats have been in protect Lieberman mode, out in full force today. Dean sent out to pacify the bloggers who don't seem especially pacified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #25
33. I saw that
I think his days are numbered...?
He's shown his true colors too many times...
This was the last straw...





peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. "There should be no reason" he has this support ...therefore, I think
many here are still in denial about what is happening right before their eyes ...!!!

2006 and Pelosi/Reid outcomes should make it impossible to be in denial --

but the instinct to deny and not see is strong in DU'ers ...

not to mention DU-DLC'ers --

Heed 2006 and get out there and create third party opyions and IRV voting

before it's too late --!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. The Dems are going out of their way to prove they aren't interested in real change.
Which, of course, makes me less interested in swallowing that line.

Note that I'm not - YET - including Obama in that. I'm waiting to see what he does, even as he disappoints me in who he's choosing to do whatever it is he'll do.

"We'll see" is my mantra.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antimatter98 Donating Member (537 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
30. More of the Pelosi/Reid style of 'forgiveness.'
Lie-berman is the turncoat that will sabotage every Obama
initiative that the GOP wishes to stop.

The voters of Connecticut caused this too, not just the
Democratic leadership or Obama personally.

Connecticut: get your head out of your @#$.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ksimons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
31. I don't wish ill on many people...

I hope he catches a nasty flu this year. All that handshakin' hopefully will catch up with him and he'll have months of sniffling, never quite feeling himself and just an all around malaise. Oh wait, that's Joe all the time!!!! LMAO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
32. K&R
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 05:00 AM by Solly Mack

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
34. KandR...good piece.
Haven't really paid attention to him since his senate race. Thanks for filling in the blanks.

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Giving in to Lieberman will come back to bite the Dems on the ass....
Edited on Wed Nov-19-08 05:01 PM by BrklynLiberal
I think it is a beyond horrible that Howard Dean, one of the few who actually stood up for his principles, and did all he could to get the DEMOCRAT elected in CT, is the one that is being shunned. It just goes to prove that there is always a time when there is no justice, and no good deed goes unpunished.
I was very disappointed when I heard this AM that Daschle was being nominated for the HHS job. If it had not been for Dean's 50 state strategy, the victory that we are all celebrating would not have been so decisive, if it actually happened at all.
I am disappointed....very disappointed.
I do not understand why disloyalty and undermining your own party's candidate should be rewarded.
LIEberman is a selfish, egotistical hypocrite. It is not to the benefit of the Dems to have him with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. I think the real problem is that he is a Washington insider.
The other insiders tend to circle their wagons around one of their own no matter how wrong they are because they don't want to lose the power they have. I really wish there was a way to break that little club up. They are ruining our country while they feather their nests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC