Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Daylight saving time doesn't save - but it might cost

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 10:58 AM
Original message
Daylight saving time doesn't save - but it might cost

Daylight saving time doesn't save - but it might cost



The days might be bright a bit earlier. But new research shows that "falling back" each fall might only help you save energy by giving you that extra hour of sleep.

By BILL McAULIFFE, Star Tribune

Daylight saving time ends tonight. Do you know where your savings are?

Two years into yet another experiment with our clocks, the original reason for it -- saving energy -- hasn't been borne out. In fact, a pair of economists assert that people may be using more energy as a result.

"One thing I'm certainly skeptical about is the beneficial effect the policy is supposed to have," said Matthew Kotchen, a professor of economics at the University of California at Santa Barbara.

Kotchen found that the darker fall mornings at the end of the daylight savings season led to a 2 to 4 percent increase in residential electricity consumption in the southern Indiana region he and his partner studied. That cost individual households $3.29 per year while increasing greenhouse gas pollution from generating the electricity.

>More<
http://www.startribune.com/local/33674494.html?elr=KArksLckD8EQDUoaEyqyP4O:DW3ckUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aUUF


The fact that the bu$h administration has pushed this latest experiment in fiddling with the clocks should give you pause as to the stated excuse vs the real outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ms. Toad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. All it does is shift where the energy is used
Work at the end of the day for lights and climate control, or home at the beginning of the day for lights and climate control. Whether it takes more energy reflects which entities are better at operating energy efficiently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's true in the winter
but it eliminates much of the energy use at night in the summer by prolonging the evening daylight, at least by the clock. Summer mornings are bright and sunny with daylight saving time because days are longer.

I'd really prefer DST year round. I remember how horribly depressing it was up north to get up and go to work in the dark and go home in the dark. Unless I went out for lunch, I just never saw the sun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. I've had days like those too
Go into work when it was dark, and go home when it was dark. Yuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
47of74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. One thing I did like
One thing I did like back in 2006 when daylight savings time began was that I was working overnight on the date of the time change. So instead of having to work 12 hours that night I only had to work 11 hours. By the time DST ended that year I was working 2nd shift and had weekends off so I got my extra hour of sleep then. I kind of had pay for that in 2007 though when I had to work the morning after DST began.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Lobbyists that pushed for it included gas grill/sports goods manufacturers
There is no energy savings because it is so dark now in morning during those extra weeks of daylight savings time that everyone has to use more lighting in the morning hours. The primary lobbyists who convinced Congress to go along with the extended daylight savings time were businesses hoping to promote more outdoor activities such as grilling out during the extended daylight in the evenings.

I don't like daylight savings anyway, but especially disliked it recently because I have had to get my elderly parents up and out to medical appointments before daylight when it is barely light at 8 am, especially on overcast or foggy days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KellyW Donating Member (539 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. The extension of DST is good for politicians
More doorbelling daylight in the afternoon in October. Before this change, getting people out to doorbell on weeksdays got real hard after we went off DST. Doorbelling in the dark is less productive and more dangerous. It is harder to find houses in the dark a folks are less likely to open their doors. IIRC is use to end about 2 weeks earlier.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
6. I read that the real reason for DST was another hour of daylight to shop. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oeditpus Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-01-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. I dunno why we don't do it the other way around
If we "sprang back" and "fell forward," it'd get dark around 8 p.m. in summer and 6:30 p.m. in winter — in these parts, that is — instead of 9 p.m. and 5:30 p.m., respectively.



:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC