Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Flashback: Alexander Butterfield

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:39 PM
Original message
Flashback: Alexander Butterfield
http://www.chron.com/content/interactive/special/watergate/tapes.html

WASHINGTON -- It was a Friday afternoon in July, and the witness was just a small fry: Alexander Butterfield, who kept President Nixon's schedule and handled his paper flow. Three staff members of the Senate Watergate Committee were questioning him, preparing for his public testimony the following Monday.

Trolling, one asked whether there might be something down at the White House, some sort of recording system?

Butterfield took a breath.

"I was hoping you fellows wouldn't ask me that," he said.

And with that, history turned a corner. What Butterfield revealed that afternoon in 1973 -- and on television to the senators and the world three days later -- was electrifying news: For 2 ½ years, Nixon had been secretly taping his conversations.

Cue the fog - flash to the present

http://editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003559300&imw=Y

NEW YORK Dr. James Knodell, director of the Office of Security at the White House, told a congressional committee today that he was aware of no internal investigation or report into the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame.

The White House had first opposed Knodell testifying but after a threat of a subpoena from the committee yesterday he was allowed to appear today.

Knodell said that he had started at the White House in August 2004, a year after the leak, but his records show no evidence of a probe or report there: "I have no knowledge of any investigation in my office," he said.

Rep. Waxman recalled that President Bush had promised a full internal probe. Knodell repeated that no probe took place, as far as he knew, and was not happening today.

Knodell said he had "no" conversations whatsoever with the president, vice president, Karl Rove or anyone about the leak.

Asked by chairman Rep. Henry Waxman if he knew this was an issue of concern, he said "yes." Asked if he learned this from the White House or the press, he said, "through the press."

(end snips)

These two men are bookends for the crime and corruption that is the Republican party. (I hope)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I think you've nailed it.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Nice. I don't believe I've had a thought about Butterfield for 30 years.
It was a moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm hoping you're right
K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedda_foil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. That was exactly my thought!
I was hoping he'd be asked if he knew why there hadn't been an investigation because I'll betcha there was a directive to keep away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. You're right. You know there had to be an order to stand down.
Just like Katrina, septembertheeleventh, Walter Reed, and everything in between.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It's really obvious that they didn't
investigate cause they knew exactly who did it. No need. If they investigated they'd have had to reveal what they found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyLib2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes! Deja vu!

How can our illustrious legislators back away from this? It would make many of them on both sides of the aisle look weaker than ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cirque du So-What Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. I was hoping to see more pounding on Knodell today
I think this is key to investigation into the outing of Valerie Plame. Henry Waxman needs to invite Knodell back for further testimony. I considered it a 'threshhold moment' today when he admitted that no investigation had been conducted whatsoever. I kept hoping I would hear the question, 'who ordered no internal investigation into who leaked the name of a covert CIA agent?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Paul Hodes
was amazing. His questions were relentless, focused and brutal. All about the NIE and the insta-declassification. Enough to make it crystal clear that they lied and lied some more about any sort of an investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Psssst. Alexander Butterfield worked for the CIA prior to joining the Nixon WhiteHouse
Edited on Sat Mar-17-07 12:44 AM by EVDebs
And much of what Woodward reported on was gleaned from (Sen-UT-R) Robert F. Bennett, of the Mullen & Co CIA proprietary. Hmmmm. The company was abused by Nixon, one of the articles of impeachment charges. But the company also heaped some abuse right back on Nixon justly deserved.

BTW, is Sen Bennett still on the CIA's payroll ? How would we even know ? Just speculating...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC