Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do you think the Republican Party godfathers REALLY wanted as their presidential candidate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:28 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who do you think the Republican Party godfathers REALLY wanted as their presidential candidate?
My money's on Mittens......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mitt, and he would have been a much better candidate.
All the better for us that they chose McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jswade Donating Member (7 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Too weird
Romney and his religion are just too weird for the conservative Christian right. They would never have chosen him. He also swings wider than a kite on a crazy string.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. in 2012 the religious right won't have half the influence over the GOP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Hmmm, you may be wrong....
...IMO, the religious wackos may be all that's left of the GOP by 2012. Many of the "moderate" Reps are the most vulnerable this election. Only the wingnuts from safe states and districts will still remain in national office, and it's logical to assume they will drive the agenda.
One thing is for sure, the next couple years are sure going to be entertaining with all the finger-pointing and fighting going on in the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #19
30. See, I've been seeing a lot of coverage of how young evangelicals are turning away from the GOP
.. I think that trend continues...

...further, I've seen party elders from the "Fiscally Conservative" wing rebuke the party for being in bed with religion.

I'll combine that with some anecdotal evidence - Evangelicals I know who are rethinking their methods of influencing electoral politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HooptieWagon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #30
42. True, some evangelicals are questioning the GOP stance on global warming
And some are questioning the RR's political strategy. But is this a mass movement? I haven't seen that. By #s, the largest subset of the GOP is still the evangelicals. That is the largest voting block. They are still the most controllable through propoganda. They still have Rush, Hannity, Dobson, and the rest of the lie-spewing bloviators. And the R's that manage to remain in office will be coming from the most conservative, ignorant, and racist states and districts (TX, MS, AL, etc). The R corporatists and neocons probably still control the big $, though. So the upcoming battle will be the #s vs. the $. Should be entertaining, the losing faction may possibly split from the GOP and form or join a third party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ACTION BASTARD Donating Member (765 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Bingo.
The crazed cross-humpers don't consider Romney a christian. For them he's just a tad better than a Muslim, but not even close to being acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Yeah, but there crazy, racist, extremist base would be screaming 'he's a mormon"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wyldwolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ronald Reagan's corpse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. If they could find a way to bring him back to life, I'd bet money on it....
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Romney, of course. They were in tears when he conceded the thing to McCain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. George Allen, but he got blown up by "Macaca" back in 2006
Honestly, I think the real top liners wanted Jeb, but the Bush name is too toxic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Other: Jeb Bush
but his big brother screwed the pooch so badly that they sighed, ran only second stringers, and gave it to Magoo out of sentimentality.

Then, because they know damned full well things are so bad they would insure the lot of them would end up in prison if they got in again, they hung Palin around his neck like a rotting albatross carcass.

They think the next 4 years will be so bad that they can trot out Jeb and the rest of the gang like Gingrich and have them run as saviors.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #8
39. I believe that you may be real close to the truth.
Expect to see old Jeb pop up as a presidential candidate down the road if yet another attempt to free all that oppressed-middle-eastern-oil becomes necessary in the publics mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. McCain
I believe that McCain had the best chance of beating Obama. They wanted McCain and they got him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. Except they thought they'd be running against Hillary.
Faux Nooze was selling the myth of her inevitability two years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeFor2006 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Katherine Harris/ Michelle Bachmann ticket
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Who Cares?

They're a failed party, going down!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
12. Other. George W. Bush. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. RONALD REAGAN
I am surprised they didn't literally dig him up. If Nancy hadn't been so frail, they might have tried to run her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. IMHO McSame...
...so a 72 year old candidatge could take a beating that they knew was likely to come. That way, nobody with a future in presidential politics would be harmed.

PEACE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cloudythescribbler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
15. From their position, McCain's as good as any -- & they may yet install him by stealing the election
and then the supine press, which made a HUGE hullaballoo about one outlier poll showing the race close (which they NEVER did vis-a-vis Kerry) would sell it as everything other than stolen, a kind of tortoise-and-hare narrative as coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
17. First Allen, then Giuliani, then Romney
Edited on Sat Oct-25-08 08:49 PM by smoogatz
then McCain. But Allen stepped in his own macaca, Rudy turned out to be a cross-dressing crook, and nobody liked Romney. That left McCain, because even the Republicans could tell that Huckabee's fucking crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I was afraid of Huckleberry. He
would have given O a real run for his money, imho. Likeable mien and a genuine outsider could have made Huck the new Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smoogatz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yeah, but the Republican money boys hated him.
They don't want an actual fundie to be president. Are you kidding me? They want a pretend fundie, like bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #25
34. I see your point. What made Huckleberry
so dangerous, imho, was the very thing that made him anathema to TPTB. Huck gave sign of having read the entire New Testament and nnt just "Revelations."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Romney, no doubt about it. And McCain assured he would lose when he failed to
Edited on Sat Oct-25-08 08:56 PM by Marr
name Romney as his running mate.

If McCain had picked Romney rather than that monument to stupidity, he'd be skating on positive coverage from the corporate media, and the Republican establishment would rig things in his favor come election day.

Apparently McCain thought he would reach out to the people they *call* the Republican "base" with his Palin pick, but he completely alienated his *real* base, the big business establishment, in the process. An idiotic, impulsive move from an impulsive idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Macaca n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mad_Dem_X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
22. I picked Rudy, because
I think they thought they could milk 9-11 for a few more years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
26. I wonder how long the GOP primary would have dragged on if they didn't have winner-take-all
Wasn't it pretty split between McCain, Romney, Huckabee, and Paul for months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chiefofclarinet Donating Member (516 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. I think it would've been settled at the RNC
With the four squabbling factions, and Giuliani and Thompson might stayed around longer, there would not have been a distinct front-runner. McCain or Romney might have had a majority, but not 50%, and it would have went to South Dakota primary to see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think they actually got who they wanted
not the masses obviously but the powerbrokers. McHoover believes fully in their economics, is a fierce war monger, and fit neatly in their pockets.

Of course they truly wanted Jeb but Dubya made that unsellable at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
29. Dick Cheney.
But his health wasn't there.

He's their ideal. And fuck him for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Cheney would never do it anyway.
Health aside, he's more of a spidery, "behind the scenes" board room type of guy. Being a president requires one to have a slightly more public profile than the evasive old Penguin's displayed during his tenure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. McCain is their choice because he sucked the least.
The new brand of Repukes cannot run on issues (since they heavily favor the needs of the corporations over the little guy), so they're all about name brands. They didn't have a Bewsh/Reagan quality brand this year. Unfortunately, old horse McCain is their guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
33. mittens wouldn't have picked pal'ass'in
Thats for sure
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
35. Voted Romney, but I think Huckabee would have been...
...by far the most difficult candidate for us to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ishoutandscream2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
36. Just look at that list! God, they had absolutely no one
and we had a great group to choose from. As someone on DU has mentioned, we have the best starters, and a damn good bench to boot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibDemAlways Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
37. They were grooming George Allen - not too bright
Edited on Sun Oct-26-08 10:24 AM by LibDemAlways
son of a well-liked football coach. 4 months before Macaca the New Republic published a cover story detailing his racist past. Even if he hadn't opened his big mouth, his decades-old obsession with all things Confederate would have become an issue. (His oldest kid is named Forrest after early KKK leader Gen. Nathan Forrest. He wore a Confederate flag pin in his high school yearbook photo (in Southern Calif) and sprayed racist graffiti on the school walls.) That and a bunch of other racist stuff would have surfaced eventually. His candidacy would have been a mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TWiley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
38. Bush #1 with VP Joe Lieberman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
camera obscura Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
40. RON PAUL... just kidding
If only Mittens had been Christian, he would have been perfect.

The religious right really caused the disarray of 2008. Some endorsed Huckabee, but others thought he was too liberal because he didn't care enough for killing prisoners or screwing the poor. Others endorsed Giuliani, but others thought he was too liberal because, well, you know. Hagee endorsed McCain of course. And Romney picked up some wary endorsements, but many seemed scared off by his religion.

If he had only been Christian, I don't think there would have been all this division, they would all line up behind him. Despite his old liberal leanings they would buy into him converting to anti-choice, anti-gay rights line. (The additional irony here is that if a Republican ran who really was pro-choice, pro-healthcare, pro-civil rights, he would have a much better chance of winning.)

Of course Mittens has flip flopped so much already, I'm surprised he hasn't already "discovered" Christianity :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
41. i know mccain wasn't the choice of TPTB, but i thought he'd be tough beat.
Edited on Sun Oct-26-08 10:50 AM by KG
white war hero vs. black guy with muslim/arabic sounding name.

but he turned out to be even stupider and arrogant than i thought possible.

he pissed away 30 years of built up PR in just a few weeks. pretty incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensemble Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
43. Mitt...
The key battleground is the industrial Midwest, and Romney would have been the best there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
44. jeb bush.
but jr. ruined that name for a LONG time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-26-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. Freddy Thompson. Grandfather of Bush. fake cowboy swagger,
fake folksy charm, complete buffoon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC