Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Randi---Victoria lied under oath she lied about her age under oath

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:37 PM
Original message
Randi---Victoria lied under oath she lied about her age under oath
anyone catch that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nope. And For Some Reason I Doubt It's True. Got A Quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. She claimed to be 25 when working for Goldwater's Select Committee on Intelligence ...
... and she was in her mid 30's. I'd guess she was born in 1940 since she got a BA in education in 1962 and worked before going to law school at the University of Detroit. She got her law degree in 1975. Thus, in the late 70s she'd be in her mid-to-late 30s.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's Completely Wrong.
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 05:18 PM by OPERATIONMINDCRIME
From what I recall, the original statement was 'working on the law 30 years ago'. She corrected it by saying 25 years ago. Based on the 1981-1985 dates I saw on CSPAN, I had figured her to be correct in that statement. I thought it was the only honest thing she did say LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone just caught that for Randi
I remember the questioning on that but at the time it didn't seem important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colinmom71 Donating Member (616 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. Randi misheard what Toensing said....
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 04:42 PM by colinmom71
What Toensing said was that it has been 25 years *since* she was part of the committee that wrote the law criminalizing revealing the identity of covert agents.

Randi misheard it as Toensing saying that she was 25 years old when she served on that committee...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. OK, thanks I'll have to review the tapes.
That hearing had so many bombshells that even that funny point might be perjury among others for Toensing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The banter was centered around the amount of time that had passed
twenty five years, or thirty?

It doesn't matter, really. She'd be a beast if she were a fresh faced eighteen year old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. yes.....that's what I heard too
not that I wouldn't like to see that scenario, but....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. It was confusing, but I don't think she was indicating her age,
rather how long ago they worked on the law - 25 or so years ago. I caught that watching it a second time, but first thought she meant she was 25 years old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I heard it more clearly than that
I don't understand how anybody could have heard that as stating her age as 25.

She's in her sixties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Self-delete
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 04:46 PM by IanDB1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. Victoria Toensing had to provide her age under oath?
...Actually Waxman at the close of the hearings put Vicky on notice that he knew she had lied and then said the law she was quoting and claimed she drafted for Barry Goldwater was some 30 years old. That would have dated the law back to 1976 formulated under Gerald Ford's presidency.

I am also wondering why that law was even drafted and adopted as Toensing's so called expert citation of the law seems to imply that the CIA is required by law to make the names of ALL Covert CIA Agents and operators known to any government official who might be in a position to disclose their identity? Wouldn't such a list completely defeat the whole purpose of being covert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. a year or more ago - I was sure I heard her say that the law was
written up in response to anger and initiation coming from Bush, Sr. following another undercover leak. Waxman started off referencing Bush, Sr. I am quite sure I heard her say that her work came out of his anger and authority to generate it. ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC