Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

sold out once again

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:37 PM
Original message
sold out once again
fuck you, dems.

no more donations from me. ask your corporate overlords for money. tell them you have no liquidity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you have a link to the bill? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. it's all over this forum
Russ Feingold is a hero tonight

so is Bernie Sanders, and a few others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I wanted to know what specifically people were objecting to
1 DIVISION A—EMERGENCY
2 ECONOMIC STABILIZATION
3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND TABLE OF CONTENTS.
4 (a) SHORT TITLE.—This division may be cited as the
5 ‘‘Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008’’.
6 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS.—The table of contents for
7 this division is as follows:
Sec. 1. Short title and table of contents.
Sec. 2. Purposes.
Sec. 3. Definitions.
TITLE I—TROUBLED ASSETS RELIEF PROGRAM
Sec. 101. Purchases of troubled assets.
Sec. 102. Insurance of troubled assets.
Sec. 103. Considerations.
Sec. 104. Financial Stability Oversight Board.
Sec. 105. Reports.
Sec. 106. Rights; management; sale of troubled assets; revenues and sale proceeds.
Sec. 107. Contracting procedures.
Sec. 108. Conflicts of interest.
Sec. 109. Foreclosure mitigation efforts.
Sec. 110. Assistance to homeowners.
Sec. 111. Executive compensation and corporate governance.
Sec. 112. Coordination with foreign authorities and central banks.
Sec. 113. Minimization of long-term costs and maximization of benefits for taxpayers.
Sec. 114. Market transparency.
Sec. 115. Graduated authorization to purchase.
Sec. 116. Oversight and audits.
Sec. 117. Study and report on margin authority.
Sec. 118. Funding.
Sec. 119. Judicial review and related matters.
Sec. 120. Termination of authority.
Sec. 121. Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
Sec. 122. Increase in statutory limit on the public debt.
Sec. 123. Credit reform.
Sec. 124. HOPE for Homeowners amendments.
Sec. 125. Congressional Oversight Panel.
Sec. 126. FDIC authority.
Sec. 127. Cooperation with the FBI.
Sec. 128. Acceleration of effective date.
Sec. 129. Disclosures on exercise of loan authority.
Sec. 130. Technical corrections.
Sec. 131. Exchange Stabilization Fund reimbursement.
Sec. 132. Authority to suspend mark-to-market accounting.
Sec. 133. Study on mark-to-market accounting.
Sec. 134. Recoupment.
Sec. 135. Preservation of authority.
Sec. 136. Temporary increase in deposit and share insurance coverage.
TITLE II—BUDGET-RELATED PROVISIONS
Sec. 201. Information for congressional support agencies.
Sec. 202. Reports by the Office of Management and Budget and the Congressional
Budget Office.
Sec. 203. Analysis in President’s Budget.
Sec. 204. Emergency treatment.
TITLE III—TAX PROVISIONS
Sec. 301. Gain or loss from sale or exchange of certain preferred stock.
Sec. 302. Special rules for tax treatment of executive compensation of employers
participating in the troubled assets relief program.
Sec. 303. Extension of exclusion of income from discharge of qualified principal
residence indebtedness.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. yeah
http://banking.senate.gov/public/_files/latestversionAYO08C32_xml.pdf

paulson's play for absolute power has not changed much at all. and he got it from the senate. hopefully not the house.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. yep
i'll save it for the aclu, or the rainy day that's coming anyway.

don't forget it's still not a done deal. the house has to pass it. if enough people make enough noise, like last week, it could go down. worth a try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Aclu don't get shit from me after they claimed impeachment was a bad idea!
dipfucks!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. they did?
that one got right by me. but i'll still support them because shit without them, i don't want to think what kind of fascism we'd be living with.

i'll have to check out where the aclu took that stand on impeachment. and it surprises me, because impeachment clearly is the constitutional answer to the fucking bushies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. There are House Republicans who you can donate to and support who voted against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Whats wrong with pointing out who is on your side - the republican populists
seriously - they are considered the republican populists who are going against the republican hierarchy. They are voting consistently with your perspective.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. progressive populism
do you know what that is?

that's Teddy Roosevelt and environmentalism, the first national parks, anti-trust.

that's FDR and social security and unemployment insurance.

that's populism. yes, it's terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. And BUSH is on your side.
So you can stop using that lame canard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Glad Russ doesn't think so - he has had my support for years and still does
Like he once said to someone who didn't support him. "Thats ok you don't have at agree with me but I'm still looking out for you"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. isn't that a hoot?
elizabeth dole voting the way i wanted my next president and vice president to!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. It really shows that not all members of each party think alike
I think its tough to know what to do but maybe its good its not breaking completely along party lines for a change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. Can you say Bernie Sanders? He's no Republican freak!
You know what I say...

Kucinich/Sanders '12
Return America to WE THE PEOPLE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
8. Learn the Facts Before Condemning Others

We need liquidity in the credit market, and the crash will be slowed down.

This bill is no panacea, but it saves many of our most vulnerable citizens---not the speculators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I know the facts and this was a terrible vote
liquidity is not a problem for solvent banks and credit unions, which, if you want to know the facts, you can read about right here on DU because it was posted today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. here's a link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. The Credit Market....

Which has all but shut down for citizens and businesses with good credit ratings.

Read more than what is posted on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. the liquidity problem was bank to bank
while they waited for the bail out and practiced a little blackmail

you are incredibly gullible, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
31. That is Only One Aspect

Closed credit markets increase unemployment and close businesses.

We'll see who is gullible and who is being foolish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. Wrong
SAN FRANCISCO, Oct 1 (Reuters) - California's planned sale of revenue anticipation notes to fund its short-term cash needs is at risk from the uncertainty gripping financial markets and the lack of a response to it by the U.S. government, California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer said on Wednesday.
"For 10 days, state and local governments have been closed out of credit markets -- long-term and short-term -- in spite of the fact that they represent no default risk and provide a good tax-free return to investors," said Lockyer, who manages the bonds of the biggest issuer of public debt in the nation.
<...>
"Without prompt federal action to address the economic crisis, we may have no market access to conduct that short-term borrowing transaction. That means the State's cash reserves would be exhausted near the end of October," Lockyer said.
"Payments for teachers' salaries, nursing homes, law enforcement and every other State-funded service would stop or be significantly delayed. And California's 5,000 cities, counties, school districts and special districts would face the same fate," Lockyer added.
<...>
On Wednesday, Massachusetts postponed its sale of $375 million in general obligation revenue notes to Oct. 7, which is next Tuesday, from the originally scheduled Oct. 2 and the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority indefinitely delayed a $175 million revenue bonds deal.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/feedarticle/7842450
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. via MadHound on a thread you started
...with the core trillion dollar price tag, we will be setting ourselves up for an even bigger fall within six months. Why? Because we'll be overspent, tapped out, with a bad debt to GDP ratio. Our US Treasury Bonds, you know, the paper that finances our debt, will be downgraded. Moody's was warning about this last January, before any mention of this massive bailout swindle. Commercial houses started downgrading bonds last week on the mere proposal of a bailout. If our bonds get downgraded, guess what. No money for the government, none, zip, zilch, zero, nada. No money for Social Security checks, no money for infrastructure, no money for defense, hell, we'll be lucky enough to have enough money to keep the lights on in the White House. Do you understand what sort of cataclysmic disaster that would be?

We're not dancing around a bonfire here, far from it. However we are thankful for the fact that for whatever reason, enough Congress members voted against this bailout, because if it comes down to a choice between a recession or depression as opposed to no funding for our government, I'll take the recession or depression anyday, any sensible person would. Because if the government isn't funded, we can all kiss our country, our society and our ass goodbye.

via a Harvard economist -

Talk of Armageddon, however, is ridiculous scare-mongering. If financial institutions cannot make productive loans, a profit opportunity exists for someone else. This might not happen instantly, but it will happen.

Further, the current credit freeze is likely due to Wall Street's hope of a bailout; bankers will not sell their lousy assets for 20 cents on the dollar if the government might pay 30, 50, or 80 cents.

The costs of the bailout, moreover, are almost certainly being understated. The administration's claim is that many mortgage assets are merely illiquid, not truly worthless, implying taxpayers will recoup much of their $700 billion.

If these assets are worth something, however, private parties should want to buy them, and they would do so if the owners would accept fair market value. Far more likely is that current owners have brushed under the rug how little their assets are worth.

---

the deal has been made and I suppose we all shall see. the mbs's should have been allowed in the first place, of course.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. The crash will be worse now.
Now that the banks are free to make more bad decisions, how can you say that this is good? Now, when the banks and the credit system crash, it will only be worse. This does nothing but take the money out of the middle class, and gives it to the upper crust. Face it, this is no longer a country of WE THE PEOPLE. It's all about them, the corporations any more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. I bought euros yesterday
because I knew this would pass and the dollar will go into the shitter.

I made a 43% return "betting" against the fascists during the Bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
27. yes, and corporatism is Mussolini's definition of fascism.
the bill was perfect example of how utterly corrupt our govt is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
11. I feel the same way. Only those who voted against this POS have my respect.
Once again, I am ashamed to be an American, as it is not a government for WE THE PEOPLE, but has become one of them the corporations. Though there are some who are working from the inside to change things, they are few. Too few to make the difference that we need. This bill will only throw good money out with the bad. What will they do when this POS fails, and the banks want MORE?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. And that is a short freaking list. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildbilln864 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. yep! k&r! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jeanette in FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Yep, they sold us out
Here's a quarter, call someone who cares.

They don't care about us. That is for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
25. so how long will it be until they ask for more money?
one year? Two? Since they have not even addressed the underlying causes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. oh, but they're going to "fix it" later
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. oh, and impeachment is STILL off the table, Evita Peron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dana_b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. just like everything else
"wait until Obama gets elected!!" Obama is going to inherit a HELL of a mess and won't be able to get to a lot of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2speak Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
33. I give it a week
but you won't know that is what the bill is about. Now they don't have to ask congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lostnotforgotten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
35. Yep, I Stopped Donating A Long Time Ago - I'm Tired Of The Appeasement
We need leaders with Balls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
38. Feinstein, Boxer both AYE. What a disappointment.
There is something going on behind the scenes we don't know about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. Agreed, Sadly.
Seems appropriate....

The Alarm "Sold Me Down The River"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8j3_DUqKyTk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC