Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Agree With Ben Stein on Something 2-Items

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:30 PM
Original message
I Agree With Ben Stein on Something 2-Items



Stein on Larry King tonight said something about two items I agree with....

......1. The lawmakers who left town to observe their religious holiday should have been forced to stay citing that people of faiths work on Christmas and Easter......These Lawmakers have put religion over country first....


.........2...The bailout $$$$$ should go to those in debt to pay their debt down and not in the hands of the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ben Stein is an ass. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buzzard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. I sometimes think he is an idiot but he is correct on this, as well as calling for Paulson to be
replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Except.....and Ben Stein should know this
is there a prohibition against working on Christmas and Easter? What are the restrictions? I could be wrong, but where in Christian scripture is it forbidden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Silly person
Christmas and Easter are IMPLIED religious observances. Just read between the lines.

And if you don't agree, you need to be burned at the stake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nilram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. He had a good article in the NYT as well
Sometimes I like his articles, sometimes I think they're crap, sometimes a bit of both. This one is pretty much right on in my view --

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/business/28every.htm


IMAGINE, if you will, that a man who had much to do with creating the present credit crisis now says he is the man to fix this giant problem, and that his work is so important that he will need a trillion dollars or so of your money. Then add that this man thinks he is so indispensable that he wants Congress to forbid any judicial or administrative questioning of anything he does with your dollars.

You might think of a latter-day Lenin or Fidel Castro, but you would be far afield. Instead, you should be thinking of Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson Jr. and the rapidly disintegrating United States of America, right here and now.

But I am getting ahead of myself. First, I am furious at what the traders, speculators, hedge funds and the government have done to everyone who is saving and investing for retirement and future security. Millions of us did nothing wrong, according to the accepted wisdom of the age. We saved. We put a large part of our money into the stock market, as we were urged to do. Because the market wasn’t at ridiculously high levels, it seemed prudent to invest in broad indexes, foreign indexes and small- and large-cap indexes.

Now we have had the rug pulled out from under us. Our retirements have been put into severe jeopardy. The “earnings” part of those price-to-earnings ratios turns out to have been fiction for some financial companies, which normally account for a big part of total corporate earnings. In fact, earnings of giant finance players were often wildly negative, creating a situation rarely seen since the Great Depression, when the aggregate earnings of the Dow 30 were negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. That should tell you something right there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC