|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:10 PM Original message |
***On the radio (Air talk) SoCal rep Brad Sherman just said the bailout agreement is a joke*** |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HowHasItComeToThis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:11 PM Response to Original message |
1. EXTORTON |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:12 PM Response to Original message |
2. Trivia: About eight years ago,John McCain endorsed Sherman's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
3. If there is any time for the Democrats to have a backbone - it's right fucking now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:23 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. Hard to believe this is happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
screembloodymurder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Now I'm getting mad. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. It also helps McCain - a deadlock would have left him there "working" on the economy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
13. Well I'd rather have McCain attached to the bail out somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. I agree. Do our Dems have amnesia?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TornadoTN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Some, maybe - others are more complicit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. I couldn't agree more! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let him veto. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Naturalist (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. God almighty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Yes he asked for it, yet he threatens a veto if it doesn't meet his |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TXDemGal (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:36 PM Response to Original message |
9. Call your Congress critters now! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadrasT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 01:55 PM Response to Original message |
14. So after all their "tough talk" in the committee meetings, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whatchamacallit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. That's what the man says |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
17. I want to see the Plan, none of this bullshit about what * said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 03:05 PM Response to Original message |
18. K & R |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Supersedeas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-25-08 03:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. yet Nancy disaster is sheppharding this crap through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 13th 2024, 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC