Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What really happened in 2004 with Kerry and the decision not to fight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Peregrine Took Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 04:37 PM
Original message
What really happened in 2004 with Kerry and the decision not to fight?
I had always heard that Edwards wanted to fight it but Kerry refused to do so. He had a "case closed" attitude and that was it.

Now I heard on Thomm Hartman's show that there is a reference to this incident in Woodward's new book in that (supposedly) Kerry wanted to fight and was going to go to Ohio asap and "camp out" until he got it straightened out.

Carville, upon hearing this, then went and called Matalin and told her Kerry's plans and she went to Cheney and told him. Someone (I forget who) in Bush's White House called Ken Blackwell and got him to dig in and not to cooperate with Kerry.

Anyone know what the real story was?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd love to know
Kerry gave every indication that it wasn't over, and that he would take the fight to Ohio.

Then, suddenly, it was over.

Just like that.

I often wondered what they had on Kerry that caused him to fold so instantly.

And, of course, the good old boys of Skull and Crossbones came to mind.

I doubt we'll ever find out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I'm with you on this
> I often wondered what they had on Kerry that caused him to fold so instantly.

> And, of course, the good old boys of Skull and Crossbones came to mind.

The "Skulls & Bones effect" has a damn big chance IMO.
Mind you, so is the simple "I know where your family live" ploy.

> I doubt we'll ever find out.

Sad isn't it? All those wasted lives, all that corruption & greed,
all that could have been yet wasn't and we will never know the true
reasons behind it.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Firespirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. I have spoken personally with Kerry on this.
It is a myth that Edwards pushed for it and Kerry vetoed it. They both wanted to go for it, until the numbers of provisional ballots came out (after Carville's sell-out -- I believe Woodward's account) in the morning. That is why they did not concede at night; they were waiting to see what the figures looked like in the morning. But by then the dirty work had already been done in Warren Cty (home of the fake terror alert) and elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. That would seem more logical
Actually all that we have to the contrary is an instant myth based on Edwards' public statement which was intended to forestall unconditional surrender in case they could find a way. People watching, angry as hell with Kerry clung to that and Edwards in their disillusionment. It spread as a argument, this read, but evidence kept coming out that Kerry was looking for ways around it, but more fatally than Gore, conceding any public protest of the fraud and suppression in the really vain search for a loophole the better prepared cheaters might have missed.

It was in vain in 2000 that Gore pursued a recount that the GOP had already planned to successfully head off in the House once the Florida elector slate was prematurely confirmed. It was in vain he went against the legal state moves on GOP cheaters' home ground. It was in vain that demonstrably and by common sense he had actually won the election. Kerry represented the next stage of submission and no preparation for the increased levels and new types of fraud and deception while suffering more subtly oblique MSM trashing.

As the MSM with the help of craven, stupid mea culpa Dem and liberal institutions, turned the lights out on plain truth as the suckers tried patiently, stoically, ever rigidly politely and futilely to find a way other than insurrection to restore democracy. The myth was some comfort that someone up there for once was dealing with the real score. In fact no one on the entire top echelon of society was doing anything but treason, getting fooled, settling for rules of meaningless myth and courtesy. Cutely, Kerry bore the brunt of the subtext to take the heat from ALL sides, even those subtexts denied by the media all bundled into one rough beast of a reputation. He bore it strongly and well.

And the GOP keeps cheating and we keep dying.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmerspixelated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think you're basically right.
I've definitely read that Carville was the one who planted the seed, so that much is right. Matalin must've been a bitch to even consider working for Cheney, but Carville is just a snoop for the left, and that was a nice term.

On the other hand, the Bushites are very much like the mafioso. Cheney might have threatened Kerry's family!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I had heard this story about Carville/Matalin before and it makes
about as much sense as anything else does. I wouldn't trust Carville with ANY information. I think he is just a slack-jawed, loud-mouthed slime ball who would sell out his own mother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. I was listening to that too.
Also, it seems that the flipping of the vote machine votes was interstate, so it appears like it was a well-planned operation. Really, were are the prosecutors sending subpoenas to these people and charging them with vote tampering? I'm sure there are laws against it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
8. it's not going to get us our 4-8 years of life back, nor the dead innocent civilians in iraq.
it's the rich men's world- we just live here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC