Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OpenSecrets.org: The Money Behind Palin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:42 PM
Original message
OpenSecrets.org: The Money Behind Palin
The Money Behind Palin

Published by Massie Ritsch and Lindsay Renick Mayer on August 29, 2008 1:11 PM


<snip>
Known as a reformer, Palin has also set herself apart from other Alaska politicians, if only by not being indicted or otherwise investigated for bribery and other ethical lapses. At the Center for Responsive Politics, we've strung together these observations about Palin's campaign fundraising and money --- and money-related scandal -- in Alaska politics:

* When running for governor in 2006, Palin raised a total of just $468,400 on her own in 2006 and $874,000 in combination with the lieutenant governor candidate, Sean Parnell, for a total of $1.3 million, according to FollowtheMoney.org, the website of the National Institute on Money in State Politics (NIMSP). That's about the cost of winning a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives from an incumbent. John McCain has raised more from the oil and gas industry alone ($1.5 million) for his presidential campaign than Palin has raised statewide in her political career. But McCain didn't bring Palin on board to win financial backers. Because he has opted into the public financing system for November's election, he'll receive an $84 million check from the government following the Republican convention and won't have to worry about appealing to Americans for anything other than their votes. Until then, though, adding Palin to the ticket may stoke fundraising a bit, especially among social conservatives.

* Palin's addition to the McCain ticket amps up the national spotlight on corruption in Alaska politics but also on her role in reforming the way business gets done in the state. In the Veco corruption scandal, involving bribery and other influence-peddling by an oil services company, several members of the state legislature have been convicted, and one of Alaska's senators, Ted Stevens, has been indicted for failing to report more than $250,000 in home repairs and gifts from Veco. Despite the cloud over him, Stevens won his Republican primary last week. Also tied to the Veco scandal, Alaska's lone House member, Don Young, is under investigation, as well, for improperly inserting an earmark into a spending bill to benefit a Florida company whose employees had contributed to his campaign. Young is awaiting official results from his too-close-to-call primary contest with Alaska's lieutenant governor, Sean Parnell, whom Palin endorsed.

* The top presidential fundraiser in Alaska has not been John McCain; it's been Barack Obama. Obama has collected about $218,000 to McCain's $140,000. Still, Alaska is a Republican-leaning state, both in money and in votes. Fifty-eight percent of Alaskans' money in the 2008 cycle has gone to Republicans. While soundly in the Republican column, Alaska donors have turned significantly more Democratic in this election. In 2006, 71 percent of their money went to Republicans, the GOP collected 59 percent of the cash in 2004 and 86 percent in 2000.

* Picking Palin may juice McCain's last-minute fundraising as he prepares to switch over to public financing after the convention, but McCain's fundraisers shouldn't expect much to come out of Alaska. Among the 50 states and the District of Columbia, Alaska ranks 50th in total contributions to federal politics, just above North Dakota. In the 2008 cycle, the state has produced just $2.6 million for candidates, parties and PACs. (California, the top state, has produced $209 million.)

* As governor of a major oil-producing state, Palin supports more drilling, both offshore and on. Like other Alaska politicians, she has close ties to the oil industry. Her husband has worked in production on the North Slope for BP, in fact. Democrats have repeatedly tied McCain to the oil and gas industry, calling him "Exxon John" and citing his financial support from the industry. Will the opposition try to cast his running-mate as "B-Palin"? Through July, McCain had collected more than $1.5 million from oil and gas interests for his presidential campaign, more than three times what Obama has collected from the most unpopular industry of this election--a fact the Democrats have pointed out repeatedly. They'll have a hard time painting Palin as bought-off by the oil industry, however. While it's one of her top-giving industries, she has collected just $12,850 from oil and gas interests for her state campaigns, according to FollowtheMoney.org.

MORE at:
http://www.opensecrets.org/news/2008/08/the-money-behind-palin-1.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R. THESE are the issues we need to address
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/article4641030.ece">She opposes same-sex marriage, but one of her first acts in office was to veto a bill blocking health benefits for gay lovers of public employees.

http://gaycitynews.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20098390&BRD=2729&PAG=461&dept_id=568864&rfi=6">The McCain campaign has very effectively spun the veto to show Palin, 44, as sympathetic toward the gay and lesbian community. Palin opposes same sex marriage.

http://gaycitynews.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=20098390&BRD=2729&PAG=461&dept_id=568864&rfi=6">Then Palin's 20 months in the governor's office have been taken up with the state's oil and gas industry. Health issues generally, such as substance abuse or mental health, have not received much attention, Storrs said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/30/us/politics/30palin.html">She has supported the teaching of intelligent design in public schools, alongside evolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Mysogyny
a hatred of women
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny


Palin isn't qualified to be No. 2. Period. (no pun whatsoever intended.)

As a woman, I completely resent and dismiss your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. My November 5th Dream...
After the votes are counted, Gramps and Gidget end up losing both states. That would sure be sweet revenge for all those shitstains who blasted Al Gore for losing Tennesee and Edwards in North Carolina.

So far, the Camp Gramps has milked $5 mil since naming Sarah Baracuda to the ticket...mostly from fundies...and, more important, got them back "on the bus". It was a calculated move to placate an important voting bloc that the GOOP feared would stay home in November and now are singing his praises all over religious and hate radio.

Again, this pick was pure desperation...a signal that Gramps is having serious problems within his own tent and needed a diversion...especially after Obama's great speech last Thursday to grab news cycles...give his shell-shocked shock troops something to rally around.

IMHO, this cynical gamble is starting to backfire. Palin better start backing away from trying to compare herself to Hillary...it's lose/lose...first with the many Hillary supporters who can see through this ploy at are taking a close look at Palin's real record...the antithesis of all that Hillary has worked for...and with the wingnuts who consider Clinton a cuss word.

A media storm is circling overhead...from Troopergate to Granniegate to her inexperience to her Bridge To Nowhere flip-flop (Alaksan corruption) to many conflicts of interest...it's obvious she wasn't vetted thoroughly and she's becoming a major distraction and liability.

As Will Pitt stated, she may be teh GOOP's Thomas Eagleton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC