Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feb 25, 2008.. 7 months pregnant?? you decide

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:37 PM
Original message
Feb 25, 2008.. 7 months pregnant?? you decide
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 01:39 PM by SoCalDem
?very large pic


This was taken at the Nat'l Gov's assn meeting this year..a week before she said she was 7 months pregnant...

http://www.nga.org/portal/site/nga
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's little Juneau!!!
Sorry, couldn't resist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. I can't believe it's been 3 hours and no one has applauded your post.
I've never been ashamed of DU until this moment. It's outrageous that no one has given your post recognition.

On behalf of gadfly posters, I say "well done, sir!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #41
77. not to be rude but there's DUers on the left coast who don't
view The Greatest Page till we get home from work. Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:15 AM
Response to Reply #77
144. and today?
This is why every day I ponder whether DU is doing all it can.

How can posters be so cruel as to ignore the obviously funny post, such as the one which started this subthread? I'm concerned. Concerned about what it says about US, as DUers.

Gloom, despair, and agony on me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bulloney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #144
182. How convenient that she was in the front row of the picture pose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madaboutharry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. She is wearing a coat.
But at 7 months most women are obviously pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. unless you are 15 and first preg.... then it is still baggy clothes ect...
i can see a kids getting away with it for 7 months and unobservant and oh too busy parents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
79. I wasn't. And my daughter didn't show even when she was 9 months pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goddess40 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #79
133. someone needs to find pictures of her during other pregnancies
but since her time in the public spot light is so extremely limited that might be a difficult task.

I don't really care about this but if it's true that's a really shitty thing to do to this kid, when he finds out the truth it will mess him up. I know as I saw it happen in my extended family.

Also she's lied about other things that are far more important, politically, that is. So I say leave the bad parent side alone, anyone that burdens their children with names like she did either is sadistic or clueless about how nasty kids at school can be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
3. Huh?
I need a clue here who I'm looking for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
59. Agreed.
I wish the links were more persuasive. I don't know what I'm supposed to be looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynthia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
78. first row, second from left
that is governor Palin of Alaska and she is 7 months pregnant with the child who is now 4 months old and has Down Syndrome. She has had at least four other children, and most women on a second or third or FIFTH pregnancy would be looking very pregnant at 7 months along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrMickeysMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #78
96. Yeah... I think I jumped on this thread too soon with comment
Doesn't look pg to me either.

Wonder if AK's web site has an archive of pix... ah, nevermind...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Ed Rendell looks like his carrying twins!
He does love those cheesesteaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. no way, we've got to make this a story on the MSM. It does have "sex" in it so it might fly
this reaks of BS and we need to nail her on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. oh no fuckin way..... what bullshit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. .....decide what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. we really need some other photos from that time frame and later.
surely they're out there somewhere. Anyone?

photos of her daughter from this past late-winter and spring would also be good... Also the family-coming-home-from-the-hospital-with-new-baby photos - including the teenage daughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
32. Here's a pic of the governor taken 2/5/08 at 6 months:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Like fuck that chick is pregnant there!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #38
120. you can't tell
my wife barely showed at all until the last 3 months. She was 30. It was her first kid though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gademocrat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. Is the baby hers?
or is it her daughter's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I'm guessing she's the gramma...
if you are anti-abortion, and your daughter has a special needs child, what else would you do?..

Maybe she got the idea from Desperate Houswives..

It would be interesting to see some pics of her daughter from dec to April.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #12
108. Does it occur to you that Daddy might be the daddy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #108
112. Yes.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 11:32 PM by southerncrone
Especially since it is downs syndrome. Genetic mutation.

Edited to add:

I don't mean to insinuate that all downs syndrome children are the result of incestuous relationships.
Just that it can be the cause when there is a limited gene pool.

OTOH, old eggs can cause the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #112
143. A recent study also indicates that old sperm as well as old eggs can lead to down syndrome children.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 08:00 AM by fasttense
Seems as men get older, their ability to produce good sperm also gets older and more sperms carry genetic abnormalities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #143
164. Had not been aware of that, thanks for the update.
It does make sense.

What's fair for the goose is fair for the gander.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #108
119. That's a pretty big jump to make.
It's possible--but there's no special reason to believe so, is there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #119
135. the occurence of Down's Syndrome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:43 AM
Response to Reply #108
121. ??????
Those kinds of accusations should probaly be left to a DA who has a shitload of evidence. Possibly covering a young unmarried girls pregnancy to save face at church is nothing like incest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
11. She's wearing black - easy to hide extra weight with black
I think this is a stupid route to go and makes us look bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. she didn't look particularly pregnant a month later according to news reports
When she disclosed the pregnancy in March, the newspapers commented that she didn't look pregnant. But not all women show their pregnancy as obviously as others.

Not sure what the point of this thread is, to be honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. I found a pic of the family, the daughter might have a "bump"
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 02:02 PM by NightWatcher


Picture of Sarah and husband Todd Palin at their home in Wasilla, Alaska. Children are from left, Piper, now age 6, Willow, now 13, and Bristol, now 17. Not pictured is son Track, now 18 and an infantryman in the U.S. Army. Sarah is now 7 months pregnant with her fifth child.

Still trying to nail down the date on this pic but it looks like early 2008 from the blog. The blog is dated March 9, 2008.
http://camp2008victorya.blogspot.com/2008/03/hillary-clintons-evisceration-of-obama.html
I dont get the name of the blog

closer look


vs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Here's the "labor story"... 5th child and she FLIES HOME in labor??
April 18, 2008
http://alaskareport.com/news48/x61145_trig.htm

Governor Palin has new baby boy - Trig Paxson Van Palin

Trig Paxson Van Palin is the newest addition to Alaska governor Sarah Palin's family.

Trig Paxson Van Palin is the newest addition to Alaska governor Sarah Palin's family.

From a State of Alaska press release: Governor Sarah Palin and her husband Todd welcomed the arrival of their fifth child this morning. The Palins were thankful that the Governor's labor began yesterday while she was in Texas at the Governor's Energy Conference where she gave the keynote luncheon address, but let up enough for her to travel on Alaska Airlines back to Alaska in time to deliver her second son.

Trig Paxson Van Palin was born at 6:30 a.m. and weighs six pounds, two ounces. The Governor and Trig are both doing well and resting comfortably.

The family released the following statement:

"Trig is beautiful and already adored by us. We knew through early testing he would face special challenges, and we feel privileged that God would entrust us with this gift and allow us unspeakable joy as he entered our lives. We have faith that every baby is created for good purpose and has potential to make this world a better place. We are truly blessed."

The Palins have four other children including Track, 18, Bristol , 17, Willow , 13 and Piper, 7.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. With a known high-risk pregnancy,I find that unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. Another article said HER WATER BROKE.. and she flew home
http://www.celebrity-babies.com/2008/04/alaskan-governo.html

On a 5th child & water breaks..and you fly home from Texas to Alaska..THE NEXT DAY :wtf:

and you know the child has downs..and may have heart related effects that are common..

This story stinks to high heaven..

Originally posted April 18th: Although not due until May 18th, the governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, gave birth to her fifth child today, Friday, April 18th, at 6:30 am. Trig Paxson Van Palin weighed in at 6 lbs, 2 oz when he was born at Mat-Su Regional Medical Center.

snip

Sarah, 44, had her water unexpectedly break (just a slow leak of amniotic fluid, she shared) while attending an energy conference in Texas, but checked in with her doctor, was able to stay, deliver a 30 minute speech, and then get on a plane to return to her home state in time for the delivery (which ended up needing to be induced) early this morning. I am not a glutton for pain and punishment. I would have never wanted to travel had I been fully engaged in labor. After four kids I knew what labor felt like, and I wasn't in labor. in this interview she says she was NOT in labor

Sarah said that while she did not tell the pilot or flight attendants that she was 36 weeks along, she did not hide her condition either .The family initially released a statement saying that Trig has "special challenges," but did not specify what they are. However, on Monday, April 21st, they said the baby has Down Syndrome. Sarah and Todd's statement reads,

Trig is beautiful and already adored by us. We knew through early testing he would face special challenges, and we feel privileged that God would entrust us with this gift and allow us unspeakable joy as he entered our lives. We have faith that every baby is created for good purpose and has potential to make this world a better place. We are truly blessed. On Monday, Sarah shared that she "initially felt sad" when hearing the diagnosis. When we first heard, it was kind of confusing. It was very, very challenging.(But now,) it just feels like he fits perfectly. He is supposed to be here with us.

The pregnancy was announced in March. Trig joins siblings Track, 18, Bristol, 17, Willow, 13, and Piper, 7. Sarah said she does not plan to take a maternity leave, but is breastfeeding, will bring her son to work with her, and plans to take some days of for his pediatrician appointments


snip

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. water broke both children. both i was immediately in hosp and induced labor. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. There is no way a doctor would let you fly home after your water
broke. My water broke on my first baby and I was immediately told to go to the hospital even though I was not in labor. With a fifth baby, delivery is expected to be much quicker so I this story doesn't seem true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #42
63. If your water breaks you are in danger of infection
Its not immediate or urgent danger- but you don't go give a speech or take a ride on a plane if you can avoid it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #42
122. You're right...my water broke with my second one.
I was told if that happened, I was to go directly to the hospital (which I did), because if I wasn't in labor at that moment, I would be very soon. The doctor was right...she was born around 3:00 a.m. the next morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
91. This is complete crap!
Did she also plow the back 40 with a mule the next day! :eyes:

No way any doctor would say fly home from TX to Alaska if your water broke, or you were even leaking!
Sound to me like she WANTED to lose this baby, or it's a cover for daughter's pregnancy as others also suspect.

More of the Repukes telling outlandishly crazy tales & expecting everyone to believe them as truth with no questions asked or any doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
43. For sure...
Running the risk of giving birth to a special-needs child on a plane?

AND after her water broke getting up and giving a SPEECH?

Interesting...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Sarah got a panicky phone call from her daughter
and Granny flew home..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
badgerpup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #18
85. Isn't there a rule or something about this?
You're not allowed on commercial airlines if you're past a certain date BECAUSE you might go into labor on the plane?

And Texas to Alaska in a private plane is a looooong trip...not a lot of room for comfort if you're in active labor...

I call :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #85
110. Commercial airlines do restrict
My daughter flew from NJ to AZ at 8+ months because her father was dying of cancer. She had to have written documentation from her doctor as to her due date and general health. They would allow her to fly up to two weeks before scheduled delivery date, not after.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #18
107. Q: Doesn't Down's syndrome occur in intrafamilial relationships?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #107
117. Uh, no, not unless one of the family member's had Down's.
Almost all cases of Down's Syndrome are related to a random problem when the body creates gametes in meiosis. It causes all or part of an extra copy of Chromosome 21 to be in place.

A person *with* Down's Syndrome can pass it on to their child, but it is not guaranteed that they will. They generally have reduced fertility, with men having much lower fertility rates than women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clear Blue Sky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #107
184. No. Downs does occur with pregnancy in older years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
80. Just wanted to let you know that top pic was taken in 2006.
I don't have the link pulled up anymore, but they used an older family photo in that March article.

Oh I remember where I found it; that site has a photo album on their front-page that shows that pic with the date.

http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/story/339587.html

(It's one of the last pics, I think)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #14
100. Thank you for the pictures, I uploaded them to ...
... the Truthiness Encyclopedia, so they're safe.

I posted them here, on Mrs. Todd Palin's page


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. Desperate Housewifes comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
16. I think it's not necessary to go this route, at all...
body types are all different when it comes to "showing", also size of baby, and supposedly the governor's was early.

Lots of serious issues with this woman to have fun tearing down, in-our-face wingnut garbage, so regardless of her truthfulness or covering "babes" up, if she is a liar, I'd say that's the least of her problems.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. True..Obama and Biden don't need to go there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #17
23. I can't believe we're going there. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalHeart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #23
81. Nor can I. This is truly a low point for DU.
And it's not just an attack on Sarah; her daughter is being dragged into this. Disgusting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #81
90. Yeah Right...
Mrs. Edwards dying of cancer but that story dragged on in the MSM for days...over a week.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 04:22 AM
Response to Reply #81
129. There has been buzz online since before the baby was born..In Alaska & on blogs
and in her former school....LONG before anyone at DU even knew Palin existed :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. is it worth playing rough to save us from a McSame presidency?
they would do just the same to us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. and it's about deception & fairy-tales..
We've had 8 years of deception.. If she would lie about something like this, and try to cover it up,what else would she cover up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. our politicians arent doing anything. it is people on a board looking for
the answer. give us a lie, and evidence it is a lie and people will check it out. start bitching when biden points the finger at her on national tv
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Sorry, I really don't see that as "playing rough"...
the woman hails from Sandpoint, ID, a right-wing haven, and it is actually pretty common for parents over there (and in the PNW) to "adopt" the offspring of their wayward progeny..."keeping it in the family", so to speak. I've hit on this with other fundies, many times, discussing things such as when should the child learn "Mom" is really "Grandma", lying to entire congregations about origins of babies, being honest with one's children, stuff like that. Let me assure you, they've got an answer for every little transgression, think they're "better" for having taken such routes, and don't leave much room for debating their anti-abortion stances, if you take that tack.

I do think she has tons of other failings that we can, should, and will hit on, but this baby business might just be opening up a dirty diaper, if you think what she may be hiding might strengthen our position against conservatives...it won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CLG_News Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
92. *Exactly!!* The GOPerverts COUNT on Democrats rolling over...
and refusing to fight on their level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. setting up daughter for a lie to be exposed about her across the nation
ya

no ones business

should have been honest
shouldnt have taken vp position and protect daughter

that simple
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. some kid at her daughter's school will spill the beans
kids always know the scoop and someone will talk..

an article I read online about her "surprise" pregnancy announcement had a comment about how she had not told her kids..

I'm sorry, but in a close family, a growing belly on Mom is NOT something you can hide.. she claimed in the interview that the kids were surprised when she told them she was 7 months pregnant :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. that is bullshit. ultimate close family and they arent joyous and sharing
if nothing else to help the littler ones along for a new addition. what parent wouldnt tell kid that is what 4.... what is that doing to the 4 yr old or however old number 4 is.

just bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Have you ever been pregnant?
Or, specifically, pregnant with a defective fetus? That alone would cause parents to keep the wraps on any celebratory feelings till it's impossible not to. Maybe they were hoping for a miscarriage or fearing one...I hear that they found out at four months about the Downs, which would have been a sad occasion.

If she is slight built, often there's no need to "hide" anything til not long before birth. I was still a size three at eight months, never bought any maternity outfits, and had trouble convincing anyone how pregnant I was until the ninth month. And I was no teen. Also dealt with miscarriages, and once you've had one, some are none too eager to announce another pregnancy, til the baby's a sure thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. 3 times.. high risk pregnancies..showed at 4 months.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #31
82. OK, playing devil's advocate here
IBut do women of 16 tend to have Down's Syndrome babies, or do women age 44?

Occam's Razor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #82
113. Down's syndrom babies are more frequent with older mothers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanderBeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #113
134. It has been suggested
that that very young mothers are also more likely to have babies with Down Syndrome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patiod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:03 AM
Response to Reply #134
147. Preterm birth maybe, but not Down Syndrome
Preterm birth and low birthweight for young maternal age, Down Syndrome for advanced maternal age

http://www.cdc.gov/NCBDDD/bd/ds.htm

I have to dig this stuff up for my job, so I'm kind of a nerd about it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #147
148. 80% of down syndrome is from mothers under 35. they also have the majority of the babies
36 the risk escalates hugely. but they also have fewer babies too

saying

a young woman can also have a down syndrome baby. it is not unheard of

and yes, the older the woman is the higher the risk. i think i read 1 in 25 babies. that is high
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #147
149. stats go up, but fertility goes down, so actual numbers change
many young mothers have a first baby with downs.. Statistics are al;ways 100% when it's YOU!..

Our first had a birth defect that only occurs 1 in 600K (or so we were told), and the circumstances of the delivery were pretty long odds too (abruption 30%+)..and yet I got 100% on BOTH counts, as a healthy 24 yr old with NO pregnancy complications until 7 months:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reggie the dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #25
123. To defend this woman
perahps she considered aborting when she found out it was a downs syndrome baby. Given her religion that would have been a rough choice but she could have not told her kids because she was considering aborting a downs baby. After thought and discussion with her husband perhaps they decided it was God's will and kept the kids, then decided to tell their children that mommy was pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. read this little tidbit of information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. interesting....
said daughter was out of school for an extended period of time with "mono". yeah riiiiight. :eyes:

wonder if palin can pull out of this now? is it too late?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. Here's another I found..listed as Feb 2008
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 03:19 PM by SoCalDem
Mom looks pretty trim, but daughter seems to have her hands together under a distinct bulge...like pregnant women all over the world hold their hands ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. that is correct!
i have four of my own and we moms know this ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. That picture is the most convincing I've seen.
I am holding my hands like that in most of the pictures I have of myself pregnant. S.Palin looks thin as a rail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #33
75. Mono? Really? That was the standard '50's excuse for an
"extended absence" from H.S. while someone delivered. It was practically code for it. Seriously... any other ladies of extended experience remember this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:06 AM
Response to Reply #75
124. Ummmm...NO!!! I believed it REALLY WAS mono!
I mean right up to the moment when I read your post! I graduated from high school in 1963, and I remember people talking about this disease called "mononucleosis" (mono for short) that seemed to afflict teenage girls more than anyone else. The treatment involved extended bed rest and an absence from school of several months.

And...I bought it! I NEVER made the connection! Not ONCE, until just now. It's hard to believe I was THAT clueless and gullible.

I feel like such an idiot. I remember hoping I never got this mysterious disease, and I never did. Was that because I got on birth control pills shortly after I became sexually active? Nobody ever told me they gave immunity to mono...but I guess they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #124
130. The rest of the girls in the class would nudge each other.
The rumor mill would be in overdrive in the cafeteria. That's the thing, it was a LOUSY cover. (I hope someone is poking around Mooseturd High School.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #130
131. That "poking around" last September is what started this whole thing
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #131
175. Hey hey, don't bash the poking!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #175
180. and somewhere "out there" is a teenaged boy who dodged a big bullet
For the story to work, it means that he's off the hook for the care of a handicapped child, and out of a big ole mess..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
118. Where's the National Enquirer when we need them?
They could have a field day with this.

Was Palin vetted AT ALL?

It was reported McSame only met her once & spoke to her on the phone once b/4 today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
37. Sorry, but no. I'm 7 months pregnant with #2, and even the way she is standing is different.
No, she doesn't look like she's in her third trimester. Those clothes are not baggy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
39. So how do you think she lived a very public life as a governor
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 04:26 PM by hack89
yet not a single person noticed she was not really pregnant?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #39
44. Because , as governor, she controlled her schedule
and for all we know, she may have taken a mini vacation..

She was only "out" for about a month..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. She was at a governors conference when her water broke
a very private, secluded scene I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #60
66. before the meeting she noticed leakage. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #66
69. She was in the group picture, right?
lots of people saw her right? To what ridiculous extreme are you going to take this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. a report said she saw leakage adn then went to meeting. so what she was in picture
she also gave her speech. the water breaking was before she got to meeting. THEN went to meeting. THEN got on airplane and flew for 11 hours.

what is your problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #70
71. So a bunch of people saw her pregnant
right? What is your problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #71
73. i have not heard of ONE person that saw her preg. not one. but i KNOW a woman
who water breaks does not become inaccessible to a hospital for ANY reason. it is the height of stupid. especially 5th child. they come out faster the more you have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #73
76. But there are many who saw her not pregnant - right?
you have the links I am sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #76
137. Yes. Even her own staff said she didn't look pregnant.
http://www.adn.com/front/story/336402.html


Secret's out: Palin pregnant

SEVEN MONTHS ALONG: Even her staff was unaware that the first family was expecting a fifth child.

By WESLEY LOY
[email protected]

Published: March 6th, 2008 12:02 AM


JUNEAU -- Gov. Sarah Palin shocked and awed just about everybody around the Capitol on Wednesday when she announced she's expecting her fifth child.
Click to enlarge


"I thought it was becoming obvious," Gov. Sarah Palin said. "You know, clothes getting snugger and snugger." The governor, who recently turned 44, told a handful of reporters as she was leaving work to expect a new member of the first family, then headed to a reception at the Baranof Hotel to feast on king crab.

Palin said she's already about seven months along, with the baby due to arrive in mid-May. That the pregnancy is so advanced astonished all who heard the news. The governor, a runner who's always been trim, simply doesn't look pregnant. Even close members of her staff said they only learned this week their boss was expecting.

"I thought it was becoming obvious," Palin said. "You know, clothes getting snugger and snugger." But people just couldn't believe the news. "Really? No!" said Bethel state Rep. Mary Nelson, who is close to giving birth herself.

"It's wonderful. She's very well-disguised," said Senate President Lyda Green, a mother of three who has sometimes sparred with Palin politically. "When I was five months pregnant, there was absolutely no question that I was with child."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #71
136. Even reporters said she didn't look pregnant and her staff was shocked when she told them she was 7
months along.

None of them have ever said she "looked" pregnant at any time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #136
138. That was earlier when she announced her pregnancy
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 07:36 AM by hack89
what we are talking about now is the fact that she was making public appearances up to the day she delivered. If she did not look pregnant then don't you think there would have been a comment or two? And don't you think the hospital staff might have a story or two about this? And how did her daughter hide her pregnancy and delivery?

There are no facts here - just speculation fueled by spite and pettiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #138
139. PROVIDED YOU A LINK ABOVE. READ IT.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 07:38 AM by JTFrog
Post 137.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #139
140. So read my answer - you miss the point completely
what about the following month or two? The delivery? The daughter's delivery? Where are the facts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #140
141. I missed what point? You said folks would have said something.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 07:46 AM by JTFrog
You said surely her staff would have said something right? I proved that the speculation was out there. Nobody believed she was pregnant and that doesn't ring any bells with you?

I have no doubt that as we speak there are people checking into the information on the delivery and the following month or two.

But if you honestly think the SHOCK and AWE of being 7 months pregnant and NOT SHOWING ONE IOTA for your 5th child that was born at a healthy 6 and 1/2 pounds is nothing to wonder about... well then, let's say that I'm not the one completely missing the points round here.

Folks on this board are obviously not the first to go... hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #141
156. Lots of people go hmmmmm over BS.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:36 AM by hack89
head over to FR if you want to see a lot of it concerning Obama. Doesn't mean that it is true. I understand your standards for truth and accuracy go down when it comes to republicans - rumors and innuendo are good enough. I just hope you are not so hypocritical as to criticize the freepers when they peddle BS about democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #140
142. Safely stowed away in Wasilla where Palin's parents live
and probably where the daughter recuperated from "mono"..

The truth always wiggles its way out.. even though Alaska is scrubbing their official website of all pictures & stories about their dear governor.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #142
154. And the hospital?
and her public appearances prior to delivery? Seems like we have a single newspaper article and not much else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #39
46. And you could turn that question around:
So how do you think she lived a very public life as a governor, yet not a single person noticed she was pregnant, and were surprised when she announced it at seven months?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. My wife never really showed until the 7th month
different body builds, different sized babies - pregnancy is not a cookie cutter event.

But again - once announcing how could she hide it? Why are you so willing to smear this woman and her daughter on such flimsy (actually non-existent) evidence? Isn't there room for basic decency in politics anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. she is a 44 yr old woman, 5th child. ANYTHING is possible
but that scenerio along with water breaking and getting on plane to fly home, shit even going to texas that preg just doesnt jive. possible, not probable

the body is different at 44 and 20's, 30's. first baby and fifth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #51
53. So why can't you wait until there is real evidence?
have you no regard for the daughter at least? Is it OK for her to be political "collateral damage" as long as it damages McCain and Palin? Are Obama's kids now fair game?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. is the daughter on here reading? is obama or any of his people attacking on this
there are inconsistencies. we are talking about those inconsistencies. what we do on the board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #54
55. Didn't the Swift boaters start on an internet message board?
They were only talking about "inconsistencies".

Obama is smart enough to stay out of the sewer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. oh bullshit. they went live in apr. media new a lie, slapped it down.
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 04:57 PM by seabeyond
did it again in aug and media ran with it.

stupid argument about it being on net.

but... i dont have to apologize to say a woman being let on a plane and flying from texas to alaska after her water broke is UNHEARD of. so. i want to know why this woman was allowed to do something NO doctor or parent would do.

WHY is it wrong to ask for clarification
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Just asking questions - got it.
perfectly innocent intentions - got that too. :eyes:

Bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #39
48. You can't exactly call someone on that
"Sorry, but you don't look pregnant." :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #48
50. Are we unique in our pettiness and cruelty?
So she has no political enemies in Alaska that lack basic human decency like we see here in this thread?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #50
83. Yeah, where were those abysmally corrupt politicos that supposed infested Juneau
when she got there? None of them could muster the accumulated bile of our friends here, I guess.

But then, that's the disinhibition of anonymity. An opponent who made the charge against her would have to stand up on TV and take responsibility for their words. Remember, they don't have a proper Internet in Alaska; all they have is a series of tubes, so Palin hasn't really been exposed to this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
52. The Alaska daily News did just that..as did everyone who was interviewd
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 05:07 PM by SoCalDem
:rofl:

It's only "interesting" because of the insurance fraud angle, and how she's using that baby as a sympathy-getting, "I'm such a devoted Mom who is anti-abortion" device..

Rev Haggart was a god-fearing Christian guy until he got caught.. so was Larry Craig & Foley..and even Bernie Ward..

Everyone's "perfect" until their secrets come tumbling out..

The hypocrisy factor is always intersting:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Can you share the link with us? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #52
65. Other factor that makes this issue news: Everyone's using her pregnancy story as proof of her
pro-life credentials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shimmergal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #52
125. How would it be insurance fraud?
Probably a 16-year-old would still be covered on her parents' policy.

What I'm wondering, more, is about the baby's birth certificate. Would it show Sarah as the mother, and if so, is that fraudulent?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #125
128. Insurance for children ENDs when they are 18 (goes a little more if they are in college)
BUT I'm pretty sure that some policies are not intended to cover the martenity needs of your children...and with a special needs child, it would make a lot more financial sense to have the child be her brother, instead of her son..and Mom & Dad would be raising the kid anyway.. Once their daughter aged-out of their coverage, the baby's condition would be pre-existing..and he might not get the care he will need..

The misrepresentation of a child not your own, as yours..for the purpose of insurance..well that's FRAUD..

People go to JAIL for "letting a family member" pretend to be them or their covered child.. Try taking someone else's insurance card the next time you take your kid to the doctor..

The state of Alaska pays for that first-family's medical coverage..

If the kid is their daughters, they should have just legally adopted him...but that would also bring "shame" on the perfectness of their little fundamentalist family, and might reflect badly on their parenting skills..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #37
67. you think she covering up for her daughter who was pregnant
and wearing clothes that would make her look pregnant. my thinking could be over the top but you never know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
40. She doesn't look 7 months pregnant, but it's really hard to tell in this picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbert Donating Member (548 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
61. She's photoshopped in
We do it all the time here... it's so hard to get a bunch of MD's in the same place at the same time. You can tell she's photoshopped in because she doesn't have a shadow. She probably wasn't there because she was 7 months pregnant
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
62. where's blago?
i don't see our illinois governor in that pic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
64. I've decided ...

DU = Bizarro World

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
68. CSPAN WJ interview with Palin from February, 2008 is available for viewing
It's on the homepage.

http://cspan.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
72. If I dress in layers, I don't look pregnant either
Even though I am due in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
74. So this is us accusing a 17-year-old girl of being a tramp?
Is that what this is? 'Cause that's what it looks like to me.

Here we are gawking at pictures of Bristol Palin to see if she looks knocked up. If this cover-up thing is true, isn't this kind of thing exactly what Palin was trying to protect her daughter from? This behavior reinforces the Puritanical stigma on teen pregnancy, which is, IMO, not the best method of fighting teen pregnancy.

It's none of our fucking business whether the Palin girl had a baby, and we all know it. There are much better things we can use to hit Palin with than this filth. We just don't need to go here. Palin kills the "no-experience" meme, she is an outrageous attempt to pander to Clinton partisans, and she is a religious zealot. All of those topics leave her kids out of the equation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #74
84. "Tramp"?
Being sexually active doesn't equate to being a tramp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. I'm perfectly aware of that
It seems to me that the people who are hounding on this have a problem with Palin's daughter being sexually active. I don't have a problem with it, and I don't think it's any of our business whether she is or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #86
89. No, I think it would be the utter hypocrisy of it all if it is true,
not that the daughter was sexually active.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. not one person has talk about daughter sex life, at all. not one. none of our business
Edited on Fri Aug-29-08 10:12 PM by seabeyond
it is the lie.....

and for me it is a mom that would create a lie adn then make herself available so the lie is exposed across the nation with her daughter in the forefront. what kind of parent would do that

she wants a lie, dont be vp to expose the lie

or

just accept and love daughter even preg. reality. truth. no one on dem side would say a word
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #93
114. Exactly. No one here, as far as I've seen, has said one single
derogatory word about Bristol Palin.

It's the possibility -- note that I only said POSSIBILITY -- that her MOTHER is so ashamed of what Bristol did that she is lying to protect her own reputation.

That's the real reason this was done in the past, that mothers would claim a grandchild as their own -- because the daughter's "sin" reflected badly on the parents. It was a familial disgrace that had to be hidden.

The other aspect, of course, is whether or not Bristol was pressured into having the baby against her own wishes. It's possible, given the mother's adamant anti-abortion stance -- no abortion even in cases of rape or incest -- that Bristol wanted to terminate the pregnancy and was forced to carry the baby to term. Her extended absences from school may have been virtual incarceration to prevent her from terminating the pregnancy.

But of course, this is all just idle speculation on my part.


Of course it is, or my name isn't


Tansy Gold
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
87. This is pointing out yet another example of GOP hypocrisy ...
Another anti-science, anti-doctor, anti-woman, female republican going to great lengths to cover up how she cannot follow the precepts of the policies she claims to support.

The question should be why is she ashamed of her daughter? Why does she support policies that infringe on her daughter's rights.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uberllama42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #87
95. Palin 'cannot follow the precepts of the policies she claims to support'?
What policies is she violating, exactly? If her daughter became pregnant and Palin kept her from having an abortion, isn't she being true to her political stance, regardless of what it does to her daughter?

The question should be why is she ashamed of her daughter?

We don't know that her daughter did anything she is ashamed of. If Palin's a hypocrite, it will come out in the investigation of Troopergate. We don't need to make a spectacle of her daughter, all the while exclaiming about her right to privacy. There are available lines of attack that do not involve Palin's children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. Sex outside marriage?
There are available lines of attack that do not involve Palin's children.
Or her grandchildren.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wickerwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #74
88. Oh bullshit.
Who cares if the daughter got pregnant at 16 or 17? I'm sure her holier than thou mother would call her a "tramp" but I wouldn't.

The point is that her mother possibly lied about it and committed insurance fraud while doing it. And meanwhile goes out and tells all the other pregnant 16 year old girls that what they've done is shameful. Plus I'll bet anything she doesn't support a dime going to teen mothers who don't have millionaire governess of Alaska parents.

On the other hand, as much as I'd like to believe this is true, it seems like they could have done a hell of a lot more to cover it up. It's not that hard to buy fake baby bumps. And even though the girl looks pregnant as hell in those pictures, wouldn't they just keep her out of them if she was? They could have sent her off to boarding school in Switzerland until she had the kid. Either it's not true or they were really, really stupid about it not thinking she would ever be put in the spotlight like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #74
97. No, that's just you reading into it something that's not there.
But do have fun being "outraged."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #74
98. THE POINT
is that the presumptive Vice Presidential nominee of the Republican party LIED.

It has NOTHING to do with her daughter becoming pregnant. It has to do with the possibility that Palin covered it up and LIED about it while holding public office.

Inexcusable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #98
132. What did she lie about?
you seem so sure of yourself - where does your certainty come from other then your contempt and hate? What are the real facts here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #132
151. I don't have any contempt or hate.
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 09:44 AM by MadrasT
Sorry if it came across that way. Maybe I should have gone easy on the ALL CAPS.

I definitely should have added the word POTENTIALLY before the word "LIED" in this sentence: "MY POINT is that the presumptive Vice Presidential nominee of the Republican party LIED." (as I did in the next sentence).

Major faux pas on my part, no wonder I seemed "so sure" to you. I'm really not, and I apologize for not being more clear.

I'm certainly not advocating condemning her without the facts, nor am I even saying I believe the rumors. Not enough information. I don't make decisions based upon speculation or rumors.

I'm just saying it's important to learn the facts. If the rumors are true, and she lied about the child being hers when it isn't, it's a problem for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hack89 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #151
157. OK - no problem. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:19 AM
Original message
LOL
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:20 AM by Marie26
So now you've gone from speculation straight to "She LIED about our irrational speculative conspiracy theory!" "Our speculative conspiracy theory is INSURANCE fraud!" So ridiculous. I heard Joe Biden's children are actually Martians - and he's LIED about it, he's claimed them as human on the insurance cards, so this is totally a legitimate story. Maybe I'll post that somewhere else & then link to it here so I can fool people into thinking it's actually true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #74
153. Pretty much
It's so creepy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #153
155. no one has mentioned the girl. yet you call her a tramp. that is what is creepy. n/t
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:20 AM by seabeyond
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #155
158. Are you responding to the right person?
I said this conspiracy theory is totally creepy, and it is. Speculate about 9/11, whatever. But speculating about a 16-year-old's sex life, squinting at pictures of her to see the signs of pregnancy, is totally out of line. Brooke Palin is a minor, not a celebrity, and she never asked for any of this publicity. It shows that Democrats are really no better than Republicans when it comes to using any baseless rumor to destroy an opponent. This is just Swiftboating, only that was just directed at the candidate himself. This drags the candidate's child into a vicious rumor & IMO that's pretty low.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #158
160. you agree this concludes she is a tramp. i think htat is creepy.
i see just a couple callling the girl a tramp, even talking about this girls sexual experience.

all posters are focused on the mom. a few go into tramp mode

shame on you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #160
161. Shame on you!
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:36 AM by Marie26
So there. You've been repeating this stupid rumor over & over & over again w/o a single shred of proof. That's just Swiftboating & IMO no different than the Republicans that repeat smears against Obama or Kerry w/o a shred of proof. And gosh, it must be true that Obama's a terrorist, or Kerry's a coward, because they read an anonymous post that said so! And this is even worse because, as I've said, it's dragging the candidate's child into the smear. Just give it a rest. At this point DU is actually worse than the National Enquirer - at least the National Enquirer has some standards on the stories it'll print.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #161
162. no..... i have been asking what woman whose water broke would give a speech
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 10:46 AM by seabeyond
and then be on an airplane for 11 hours

what woman would do that. i do not know a single woman who has had babies that would do that. i do not know any woman who has had four kids that would walk away from medical care and be alone for such a long period of time without any medical help available.

what woman would do that

that is a reasonable question

i want an answer

and NO doctor would allow it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
94. high heels....hmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FedUpWithIt All Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
99. Anchorage article from march.
That the pregnancy is so advanced astonished all who heard the news. The governor, a runner who's always been trim,

simply doesn't look pregnant.



Even close members of her staff said they only learned this week their boss was expecting.

"I thought it was becoming obvious," Palin said. "You know, clothes getting snugger and snugger."

But people just couldn't believe the news.

"Really? No!" said Bethel state Rep. Mary Nelson, who is close to giving birth herself.

"It's wonderful. She's very well-disguised," said Senate President Lyda Green, a mother of three who has sometimes sparred with Palin politically. "When I was five months pregnant, there was absolutely no question that I was with child."


http://www.adn.com/front/story/336402.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
101. This from March 14, 2008.


Michael Dinneen / Associated Press

From left, Alaska governor Sarah Palin, Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell and Sandy Parnell announce Palin's endorsement of Parnell Friday, March 14, 2008 at the state elections office in Anchorage, Alaska. Parnell had just filed to run against incumbent Republican Don Young for U.S. Congress


And this site has a video with her, dated from February 2008 (exact date unknown) when she would be about 6 months pregnant.

http://alaskapodshow.com/index.php/2008/02/20/my-visit-to-juneau-alaska/#comments

(go to around 4 minutes in)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #101
104. The reporter in the video looked more pregnant than she did. (6:00) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #101
109. well, at least she has a waistline n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #101
115. Two images from that video




I dunno, she certainly doesn't have much of a waist in these. She could pass for 5-6 months pregnant.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #101
145. She doesn't walk like a pregnant woman. The way she almost hopped
up those stairs. She doesn't look or walk like a pregnant woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
103. Granholm is cuter.
MUCH cuter!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
105. Sorry folks, but I was 37 when pregnant with my daughter (1st) and didn't look
pregnant before I got into trouble at 7 months with severe pre-elampsia. She was born 10 weeks early. All I lost was my waistline at the time.

She could well have been pregnant from these photos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #105
106. first preg almost always is late showing. it is the preg after that show much quicker
this was her fifth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nonconformist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
111. I'm 35 and 7 months pregnant with my 3rd child....
And let me tell you, I'm ginormous. I started showing way sooner than I did with my other children, too, which is VERY typical for 3rd or subsequent pregnancies. I am of average height and weight.

I also think that story about her water breaking and her flying home for 10 hours sounds like bullshit. When your water breaks, you are at great risk for infection and are generally immediately admitted to the hospital. In fact, even if you're in hard labor, doctors aren't keen on letting you go over 24 hours after your water breaks before taking the baby because of the risk of infection, cord prolapse and stress on the baby. And her being of AMA (advanced maternal age) and this being her 5th child, her pregnancy would have been high risk anyway, which means she would have been very closely monitored and it would be assumed that labor could progress very quickly. Not to even mention that prenatal tests had already indicated that the baby had Down Syndrome, which means it would have been an even higher risk pregnancy. This is all assuming she had adequate prenatal care, and it's safe to assume that a Governor would.

It's all very strange, really.

And back to work 3 days after giving birth? That doesn't even begin to compute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #111
173. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Alcibiades Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-29-08 11:51 PM
Response to Original message
116. My 2 cents
My wife's due in three weeks, and is carrying this one much smaller than she did with the first one. Her own mom has remarked many times how she "finally looks pregnant," etc. She's looked pregnant to me for months.

Palin's clearly not pregnant in these photos. She probably felt no need to hide her daughter, because she's up in AK, which gets no media attention. She probably had no idea she'd be in the running for McCain's VP slot.

Nothing looks like a pregnant belly. Her daughter doesn't look pregnant in some of the photos where she's wearing form-fitting clothes, but seems pregnant in the one with the jacket. At no time does the Governor look pregnant (and it's not just the belly--the whole posture and stance is different). The mono story is a little smelly.

The flying on an airplane thing is really, really smelly. To quote the Mayo Clinic:

"Many doctors recommend that women avoid flying after 36 weeks of pregnancy or if they're at risk of preterm delivery."

Older mothers are, of course, at a higher risk for preterm delivery. But to be leaking amniotic fluid and to get on a plane, rather than deliver wherever you are: complete and utter bullshit. Any mom who's ever done this before--as she had--would be like "Get me to the hospital, now!" They wouldn't get on any damn plane. It seems more likely to me that she had to rush home because her daughter was going into labor.

Photos of her breastfeeding would go a long way towards determining if this is a hoax, but those could be faked, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 04:13 AM
Response to Reply #116
127. Lactation can be stimulated, in a fertile female..and only the baby knows for sure
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
126. I have no idea what the truth is here but I have an idea of how this could have been done..
In adoptions right after birth, AFAIK, the adopting parents' names go on the birth certificate. It would depend upon state law, but if she had agreed to let her parents adopt the baby, it may be that they are the legal parents as soon as the baby was born. No problem for the OBG, since the kid is legally theirs, no disclosure from others because of HIPAA and her high profile.

As they sometimes say in Brooklyn, ba.da.bing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
146. DU: We Report, You Decide!
All the baseless rumors that are fit to print! It's kinda hard to knock Fox News for repeating vicious rumors if liberal sites are willing to do the same, or worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #146
167. Agreed. As if someone on DU is going to figure it out by staring at photos.
Let the National Enquirer do their jobs if this is going to be the kind of crap you care about. And if it turns out that the child IS hers, or even if they fake it, we will look like petty assholes for no reason.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
150. Certainly doesn't look pregnant in that picture
In fact if you look closely or blow this up, the shading of the jacket and the nature of the wrinkles indicates that her waistline is going in, like it would with a normal woman, as opposed to going out or remaining straight as it would with a woman who is pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek_sabre Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
152. she looks pretty pregnant here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #152
159. Yep


Can you people give it a rest now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #159
171. But...but...she must've put pillows in her skirt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
163. Isn't this a subject for the likes of the National Inquirer, TPZ.com, E channel,
and PerezHilton.. If its true, let the smut mags take this apart.. not us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #163
165. agreed. we are better than this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #165
169. Apparently not.
Hell, if the 'rumors' were true I'd say go for it. But until this is documented (and it will be by one of the world's scandal rags if it's true) it is only one step above "so-and-so looks gay in this picture."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
166. THIS IS RUMOR MONGERING: DU loses ALL credibility when you do stuff like this
Stop trying to be the Weekly World News and start getting real info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:23 PM
Response to Original message
168. Picture of her "non-pregnant" daughter Bristol...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #168
170. Why are you criticizing her daughter for being a healthy weight?
If she was really 7 months pregnant they'd've hidden her stomach behind one of her sister's heads or told her to wear something looser. Good god.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #170
174. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #174
176. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:39 PM
Response to Reply #176
177. Besides being out of line
Edited on Sat Aug-30-08 08:41 PM by nothingtoofear
I don't remember asking your permission to say anything that I've said. I don't need your approval. And you are not the political police. If I want to present a thought I can within the parameters of this forum. I have done this. If you have a problem with that you can answer in a constructive manner. Or you can ignore it. You did neither and saying that I have no reason to continue arguing with you. I have no problem with you. I don't care what you think. And, most importantly, I have more important things to do than to sit here and argue with someone that won't present a constructive argument.

Cheers,
NTF

Edit for link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3461816
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #177
178. i have even been directed by these posters which threads to participate in
literally telling me to go in and talk about the subjects they think i ought to talk in, .... if i have the courage, whatever the fuck that means
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fearless Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #178
179. Ahh... Can't wait for November to come and go. LOL.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-30-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
172. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
181. The second pic has been scrubbed. Did anyone save it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #181
183. this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
185. Yeah, I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC