Think the destruction of America is the result of "bad management?"
Think again- it is by design.
Note how the gatekeepers of name base call it a "conspiracy."
I'd say they've made their plans fairly clear, in print.
"Trilateral Commission, 1156 Fifteenth Street NW, Washington DC 20005, Tel: 202-467-5410, Fax: 202-467-5415. Home page: www.trilateral.org
List of Members. April 6, 1992
No one is quite sure why the Trilateral Commission exists, and less clear about what it does, but critics from the lumpen (non-elite) Right as well as the scholarly Left are certain that it's important. If you feel that the Democrats and Republicans are two wings of the same party, and that someone else is pulling the strings and laughing all the way to the bank, then Trilateralism is your cup of conspiracy tea. When Reagan pointed out on February 7, 1980 that 19 key members of the Carter administration were Trilateralists, George Bush gingerly dropped his membership. And by 1992 some observers were getting curious about Bill Clinton's membership.
The Commission is an alliance of top political and economic leaders from North America, Japan, and Western Europe. Their aim is to manage global interdependence between these Big Three in a way that allows the rich to stay rich -- probably by discouraging protectionism, nationalism, or any response that would pit the elites of one against the elites of another. The anticipated economic pressures will be deflected downward rather than laterally. Trilateralist Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker put it more bluntly: "The standard
of the average American has to decline." "
http://www.namebase.org/sources/SD.html
And on the Amero- think that is just CT talk?
Read Robert Paster's Trilateral Commission paper on the idea-
http://www.trilateral.org/nagp/regmtgs/pdf_folder/pastor02.pdf
"The most interesting surveys, however, show that a majority of the public in all
three countries is prepared to join a larger North American country if they thought it
would improve their standard of living and environment and not threaten their culture.
Mexicans and Canadians do not want to be incorporated into the United States, and they are
ambivalent about adopting the American dollar, but they are more willing to become part of a
single country of North America and of a unified currency, like the "Amero," proposed by Herbert
Grubel. 2 The "Amero" would be equivalent of the American dollar, and the two other currencies
would be exchanged at the rate in which they are then traded for the U.S. dollar. In other
words, at the outset, the wealth of all three countries would be unchanged, and the power to
manage the currency would be roughly proportional to the existing wealth. The three
governments’ remain zealous defenders of an aging conception of sovereignty whereas the
people seem ready to entertain new approaches."
And-
"There are three sets of choices on how we might respond to the opportunity and the
vulnerability - the two sides of integration. Canada, Mexico, and the United States could each
choose to defend itself by retreating behind a fortress of tighter security and more barriers at the
borders. This path would offer only a false sense of security, and it would reverse the
remarkable progress made in the last decade in expanding trade and investment. More
importantly, it would diminish the standard of living of all three countries. A second option is to
act as we always have - handle one problem, one country at a time. This is the most likely
course, but it is flawed, for reasons I will describe below. The third path is to lift NAFTA to a
new level of cooperation. That is the direction I hope the Trilateral Commission will consider
and endorse."
Jus' sayin, for anyone attempting to understand the present and
prepare for the future.
BHN
On Edit- Trilateralists in the US Government since 1980 listed here:
(Or, still think there is a two party system?)
http://www.augustreview.com/issues/globalization/the_trilateral_commission:_usurping_sovereignty_2007080373/