Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Where The John Edwards Scandal Is Headed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:27 PM
Original message
Where The John Edwards Scandal Is Headed
A former Senator and vice-presidential candidate misused campaign contributions and money pledged to fight poverty so he could bring his mistress on the campaign trail with him during the presidential campaign where he was constantly making appearances with his widely admired cancer stricken wife then fathered the mistress's child sometime around the time he was getting a Father Of The Year Award and then asked his loyal aid who already has a wife and kids to falsely claim paternity while the fake dad and the mistress were funneled money so they could move to be near the mistress's psychic healer friend while the former candidate continued to meet the mistress and baby until he was caught by tabloid reporters and hid in the bathroom and then confessed on national TV a couple of weeks later but both he and his wife continued to lie during that interview and in subsequent statements.

And the press is supposed to yawn that story off?

As we head into the the Democratic convention, the Edwards scandal isn't over. It's really just beginning. Don't blame the media, blame John Edwards.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lee-stranahan/where-the-john-edwards-sc_b_119691.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards is already off the national stage as far as the convention goes
And Arianna Huffington is a perfect example of how (she claims to be a lefty or centrist) our own pundits shoot our own public image down for money, fame and fortune. You won't see the other side doing this to each other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frances Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Agree this stuff belongs in the gossip section
Edwards is not our candidate.

I think 50% of people cheat in their marriages, but I really wish people who are capable of doing so much good for other people could restrain themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yep. Edwards may end up in jail when this is all over.
Kerry's first choice was Gephardt, and while I thought he was awful, if he could've given us Missouri and Ohio, we would've won.

Edwards barely got elected in his first Senate term and was never very popular in North Carolina. He was a lightweight from the beginning and it was a matter of time before his career completely fizzled out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think some people in North Carolina wondered
why someone with his wealth would run for president when his wife was ill with cancer. If they thought he wasn't taking his family responsibility seriously enough then...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. if it comes to that Obama needs to pardon him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. huh...?
why for...? the guy is a sleazebag of the highest order. i'm assuming the criminality will come from the way funds were used- it always seems to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #17
35. That is a horrible idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. I thought I was through hiding Edwards threads....
I guess not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'll believe paternity when it is proven, not before
and it's not likely to be proven soon since the mother in question has refused to submit material from the child.

However, that never stopped the salacious press, has it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheney Killed Bambi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. the mother also
has admittedly been receiving large payments from Edwards' associates. That puts her refusal to take a DNA test in a more suspicious light, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. It's still a refusal
and I'll believe paternity when it's proven.

Since everything is out in the open, there is no more need to pay hush money, if that's what it is.

Paternity should be proven, not taken on faith or tabloid guesswork.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. if edwards IS the father- everything isn't out in the open- hush money would still be appropriate.
just sayin'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Yeah, and if I had ten million dollars I'd be rich
and if Republicans had brains they wouldn't be Republicans any more.

Start adding up those "ifs" in your post.

Talk to me as soon as proof is available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. i only count one "if" in my post...
and it's an "if" that could very easily be erased by those involved if they chose to. and unfortunately for them- in the court of public opinion- you are generally considered guilty until proven innocent.
(especially if when the term "sleazebag ambulance-chaser" is likely to show up in the person's bio.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:16 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. IF he is the father
IF there has been substantial sums of money paid

IF it is hush money

IF there is still any reason at all to keep it quiet if he IS the papa--and remember he's agreed to the test. She hasn't.

See? They do add up, don't they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. hush money HAS been paid
the ONE and ONLY "if" in MY post is the one about paternity...and circumstantial evidence in the court of public opinion(the only one that matters at this point) is pretty much making that "if" irrelevant.

so that would make the math more like 1-1=0.

the guy's name is toast, and he'll be lucky to come out of this with his ambulance-chasing license still intact...

:rofl: how the "mighty"(high opinion of himself) have fallen...:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #30
49. Are you sure it was HUSH money? Did you see the check,
and did it have "hush money" on the "for" line?

Yes, his career has certainly been derailed because all of this looks very bad.

However, this is not a good thing. He and Kucinich were the only candidates speaking up for hard working Americans.

I would prefer to have such people untarnished by the scandals you seem to take great glee in promoting.

The burden of proof about that child's paternity, however, has not been met. The accuser must meet it and she has been disinclined to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. no...it was probably payment for her expert videography...
:eyes:

I would prefer to have such people untarnished by the scandals you seem to take great glee in promoting.

i got news for you- I didn't stick john edward's dick into reille hunter. and I didn't lie about it and cover it up- that was ALL johnny...(AND elizabeth). i think the edwards clan is showing VERY WELL just what kind of "such people" they REALLY are-

THEY had chosen their "angle" for providing themselves with a lavish and luxurious lifestyle, and now johnny boy has crashed the bread wagon.

good riddance to them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
40. Edwards is a lawyer. Do you really think that paternity hasn't been proven yet? I think it is just
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 07:03 AM by OmmmSweetOmmm
being withheld from the public. That would be their choice to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. The misuse of funds is what will keep this alive in the MSM.
That could lead to a criminal investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodyM Donating Member (127 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Those who are righteously indignant
over the John Edwards saga ought to look into John McCain’s marital history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. This is just TOO rich.
Every bad thing I ever said about the man is true and then some.

What a despicable person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
36. I wouldn't go THAT far
I'd say every bad thing I ever thought about the man but was too polite to voice is true and then some.

And I'm not usually one to hold my tongue...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
11. Meant to quash the poverty issue.
Edwards screwed up, but the media is making sure to silence a voice against poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. You're right - but don't blame the media
Edwards quashed his own voice and poor people are going to have to pay for it.

I'm all for bashing the MSM, but this time it's nobody's fault but Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kansas Wyatt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. I said Edwards screwed up, and he just handed the media a gem.
They are going to use that gift to silence the poverty issue, by making sure he is completely discredited.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. They won't have to work hard.
I'm not disputing that the media is loving this opportunity to quash the poverty issue - an opportunity which was handed to them on a silver platter. I'm just making sure we remember it was Edwards who took all the work out of it and did their jobs for them with his egregious behavior.

The media does what it does. In many cases, it unfairly targets the undeserving. Sadly, this is not such a case. I'm sure we don't disagree on this, and I'm just reinforcing your point in a sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Don't blame the homewrecker
Homewreckers can only wreck homes which include men willing to risk wrecking them.

Hehe... kind of an awkward way of saying "it takes two to tango," and pinning it all on the woman (as nasty a piece of work as she may be) is not the way to go.

Edwards is a human being who made a mistake many people make. Unfortunately, he was in no position to make such a mistake and he should have taken his responsibilities more seriously. Yes, he's "only human," but he chose a life of public service. He voluntarily accepted a higher standard and therefore his failure to maintain it rests squarely on his own shoulders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. your post is a prime and hateful example of truly disgusting sexism.
and JE compared to FDR? Fucking insanely stupid comparison. JE did shit for poor people. He's not fit to be mentioned in the same breath with, for example, Bernie Sanders.

Con artist, self-indulgent, egotistical. That about sums up little johny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:07 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. What policies?
The only time he could have made policies, was when he was in the senate. Have you even checked his voting record? He neither wrote, co-sponsored nor vote on any bill wrt poverty. But! He did co-Spenser the IWR.

He's been a poseur since he campaigned in 1997. He's not going to "turn around". What you have observed lately IS the real johnnyboy.

I am so lovin' it! His true colors are finally showing the world what kind of man he truly is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #27
37. Way to dump it all on the woman
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Amazing to see that kind of rank hateful sexism here.
and letting JE off the hook because he's some poor naif who got ensnared by the evil "pussy", is way beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. That's for sure.
Let's remember not to throw the baby out with the bath water. Progressives need to keep the focus on poverty issues, and the declining middle class.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Did someone hypnotize him and make him screw a bimbo?
again and again and again?

People who are hypocrites often espouse lofty goals...

I think it's a way to excuse themselves for the nasty things they are doing in their secret lives..

and a way to lay guilt on the people who eventually expose them..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
41. I think if Edwards had made better choices AFTER he screwed up. he'd still have a voice to offer
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 07:41 AM by blm
on the issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Damn. Edwards made fools of a lot of us.
I supported this guy strongly. What a disappointment.

Oh well, sometimes you go out on a limb and fall off. That's life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
14. 'Follow the Money' has always been a strong sentiment here on DU...
when it comes to the repukes.

No different when it's a Dem, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
18. What kind of nut would that loyal aide be to take the rap for Edwards
when he already has a wife and kids. That kind of loyalty is really weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #18
39. maybe because he is being paid off along with his wife
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. and the worst thing is that he damaged the 'brand' of fighting poverty


The next time someone stands up and says they are devoting their lives to fighting poverty in America people are going to roll their eyes and see who their assistants are.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hidden Stillness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Aug-18-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
31. Powerful OP; Accurate
Wow, what a powerful statement that OP makes; very concise and clear, like a punch in the gut. THAT is why it was so offensive and ugly, why this revealed Edwards to have been such a bastard and such a phony, just the way many of us already noticed otherwise. This sums up the case right here. The loss of Edwards to the "cause of poverty" is the loss of absolutely nothing, as Edwards never did anything for it anyway. There are many good people fighting for the cause of the poor and against corporate corruption and greed, and they describe the problem and solutions correctly, which Edwards never did. Notice also how the Edwards fans jump to the "hate the 'bitch' " routine so easily; that isn't part of your "loving idealism" reflecting the spirit of the Edwards stage-act, is it? Get rid of this sorry phony, and return to cheering for people like Dennis Kucinich, with one great effort after another, for the people of our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
34. it is sordid and disgusting
what a disgrace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #34
42. I agree.
Edwards knows how important this upcoming election is, yet he still took this stupid, selfish, chance.

The man is a selfish pig, just like Bill Clinton was.

I supported and believed in John Edwards, now I despise the fool.

Before you flame on about Bill Clinton, think about how George Bush got close enough to steal the election from Al Gore, because of a blow job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
54. Bill Clinton left office with 49% approval ratings in the polls. NADER
and Gore's refusal to let Bill campaign for him are the reasons Bush got close enough to steal the election. BC's BJ had nothing to do with Gore's 2000 loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:28 AM
Response to Original message
43. Stick a fork in him; he's done.
He tripped over his dick, and in politics that's often fatal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. one-term flash-in-the-pan senators don't generally make it to the rank of 'elder statesman'...
and edwards won't be any different. his political days are OVER. for EVER.

i wonder what he was thinking during those 15 minutes that the enquirer people had him pinned in the hotel bathroom...?
that had to SUCK for him. good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. He's done because he lied about it, and proclaimed his marriage as an important part of his campaign
He betrayed the Democratic Party by running for president after he lied about his infidelity. If he had been nominated, then the truth came out, we would have John McCain as president for four years.

He didn't just betray his wife. He betrayed all of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shrike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
46. This is going to be the Gary Condit/shark attack story of the summer
Obviously the Enquirer is not going to let go of the story, so he won't be off the hook. (You know, he's off the public stage, he's not a sitting senator, he wasn't on the VP short list, he wouldn't have had much impact on public policy anyway. So who'd he piss off? Why is it so important to go after him? Who benefits from this?)

Edwards has made enough enemies that if he has broken the law, I'm sure some zealous prosecutor will rein him in. If he's been a bad enough husband, I'm sure Elizabeth will divorce him.

But we're in some serious shit here. REALLY serious shit. We all read about it every day on DU. So if political junkies, bloggers and media types want to get their panties in a bunch about this, fine; I'll worry about other things. (I don't blame any Edwards donors for wanting their money back, though.)

For the record, in my little neck of the heartland even Republicans don't give a damn about this story. And I live in a really red state. The most frequent comment around here is "so what?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #46
47. The story will stay alive - in both the tabs and the news.
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 09:21 AM by robcon
Three things will keep it alive:

1. The money - how did Hunter move to the house in North Carolina, then to Santa Barbara? What's the source of the money?

2. The timing - the dates don't work out for Hunter emails and Edwards' claim of the end of the affair. Is Edwards' timeframe just the one he told his wife, not the real one?

3. Who's the daddy? This will be the focus of the tabloids, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #47
48. The tabloids do love their "love child" stories.
Especially when there's a dispute over the father's identity. The story will die eventually, but if Edwards did try to get back into politics, even in ten years, this story would still haunt him.

We'd see the ten-year-old boy's face in the Enquirer next to Edwards' mugshot as the subhead invites us to "notice the similarities" between the two faces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
51. It gets even more sordid. Rielle's dad was tied in with a horse killing scandal back in the 80s
Apparently Daddy Dearest, an insurance lawyer, was hard up for cash so he tried to sell his kid's show horse. He couldn't get anywhere near the asking price so he hired a hit man to kill the animal for the insurance money. He bought the equipment and taught the guy how to electrocute the horse so that the cause of death would appear to be an accident. The guy, Tommy Burns, later became known as "The Sandman" around the show barns because when he showed up horses would mysteriously die. Once caught, Burns rolled over on his well heeled clients and quite a few members of the horsey set spent some time in the graybar hotel for insurance fraud.

Rielle, then known as Lisa Druck, was in a pickup truck outside the barn with her boyfriend when the horse was killed. They saw a man leave the barn late at night, chased after him, then went back inside and found the horse dead in his stall. She apparently caught on very quickly that Dear old Dad had taken out a contract on ol' Dobbin.

No wonder the woman's screwed up--and unfortunately for John Edwards, this is absolutely fascinating.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/columns/story?columnist=munson_lester&id=3533725&lpos=spotlight&lid=tab4pos1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
52. That's one hellavuh sentence! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mnhtnbb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
53. Gee, when I posted a LTTE from the local Raleigh paper
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 03:56 PM by mnhtnbb
where a guy who volunteered, donated, and recruited donations for Edwards said he wanted his money back, my thread got locked for being flame-bait.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x6631924

I guess only the Huffington Post is allowed to run such opinions.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC