Oh boy, some of the redactions in the Ivins doc dumps aren't complete

[ck4829]

Here's something I found:

On November 17,2001, Senator Leahy's Chief of Staff, was interviewed by Task Force
investigators. The staffer stated that Senator Leahy has drawn fire from some conservative prolife
supporters. The staffer advised that Senator Leahy and Senator Daschle were seen by some
members of the public as slowin .R.I.O.T. Act. Senator Leahy
reportedly was critic6 &b?!H?tj&%& far reaching and
threatened civil liberties. The staffer also related that Senator Leahy had been criticized by
conservatives and Republicans for resisting the appointment of Republican appointed judicial
nominees.

That funny looking portion says:
"Critical of the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act because he believed it was too"

http://www.usdoj.gov/amerithrax/07-524-M-01%20attachment.pdf

Look for other failed redactions!

[peacetalksforall]

1. This is slander. They committed slander in the way they redacted - making it read

that Leahy was a critic
far reaching
and that he threatened civil liberties

Really Rovian - I wonder if it was Rove himself - called in to gain some benefits from the act of having to reveal the docs.

[rateyes]

2. It wouldn't surprise me if the anthrax attacks were the work of

some anti-abortion moonbat.

[Junkdrawer]

3. Marker bleed through of the previous page...

:shrug: