A Parting Gift to the Religious Right

[marmar]

from Truthdig:



A Parting Gift to the Religious Right

Posted on Jul 28, 2008
By Marie Cocco

From the people who brought you the Terri Schiavo spectacle, the stem-cell research stalemate and the atrocious waste of tax money on abstinence-only sex education that has been shown not to work, comes a sequel: a proposal to redefine abortion to include some of the most common forms of birth control, and to potentially penalize with funding cuts hundreds of thousands of doctors, hospitals and other health care providers who expect their employees to give women full reproductive care.

This parting gift to the religious right comes in a proposed rule by the Health and Human Services Department, which says it is merely revising existing federal rules that allow health-care personnel to opt out of performing an abortion if they have a moral or religious objection to the procedure. From that minimalist and unobjectionable clause, a monster grows.

The draft regulation would redefine abortion to include “any of the various procedures—including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action—that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.”

The right wing has failed to win approval of a “human life” amendment to the Constitution that would declare that life begins at conception. It has failed to get even conservative-leaning courts to go along with the most extreme elements of its anti-abortion agenda. It failed to block approval of the RU-486 pill that produces a medical abortion. It failed to block government approval of emergency contraception—the “morning after” pill long promoted by the medical profession—which is taken whether or not a woman even knows she is pregnant. Seven years ago, when the first Bush administration budget included language that would drop a requirement that federal workers’ health insurance plans offer contraception if the plan includes coverage of prescription drugs, a bipartisan storm extinguished the idea.

And so, having failed to keep American women from having access to basic birth control, the right is trying to use the guise of an existing “conscience” requirement to achieve what it cannot accomplish through an open political process. You could, if you were taken to an emergency room after being raped, be told by a worker invoking the conscience clause that you cannot have a drug to prevent a possible pregnancy.

“Women would be totally subject to the luck of the draw when they went to get reproductive health care,” says Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. ......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/20080729_a_parting_gift_to_the_religious_right/?ln

[BlooInBloo]

1. And my parting gift.....

[salin]

2. VERY IMPORTANT

Both direct and indirect - the direct is obvious and well stated by the Planned Parenthood president, indirect is the redefining of now legal controceptives as falling into the "abortion" definition. I can see zealots using that to backdoor more policies to make conttraceptives hard (impossible) to access for many people. I used to dismiss those who would claim that this was a possibility (making policy to get halt access to contraceptives) as there wouldn't be the public support for such a thing. But these bushzealots change policy not in the public (congress where it gets watched) but by quietly rewriting federal rules and regs at the dept. (e.g. the dept of health and services) level.

a big k & r

[freesqueeze]

3. barefoot and preggers

that's where they belong



The best thing about this election is that these freaks won't have an agent for their religious bigotry in the white house.