Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Tells You Basically Everything You Need to Know about legal interpretation in the Bush Admin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 02:05 PM
Original message
This Tells You Basically Everything You Need to Know about legal interpretation in the Bush Admin
Edited on Thu Jul-17-08 02:10 PM by kpete
Thursday, July 17, 2008
Marty Lederman

This Tells You Basically Everything You Need to Know . . .
about legal interpretation in the Bush Administration:


Jane Mayer's new book provides further telling details:

"The footnote (8 of the Levin memo -- the one suggesting that he was approving all the CIA techniques) had a contorted, forced quality. Although few knew it, there was a reason why." Levin had already antagonized David Addington by adopting the Goldsmith view on the NSA program, and by initiating a reconsideration of whether the CIA interrogation techniques were lawful. At this point, according to Mayer, Alberto Gonzales (then awaiting confirmation as Attorney General) "made clear to Levin that unless he included language in his new legal memo declaring that nothing in the Bush Administration had done in earlier interrogations was illegal, the Justice Department would not accept his opinion." Levin "was worried that unless he gave Gonzales what he wanted, the Bush Administration would scrap his memo, abandoning the whole effort to reform interrogation practices. Under these extraordinary circumstances, Levin agreed to put in the cryptic footnote whitewashing previous practices. He reasoned that if he wrote it carefully enough, it would accurately reflect his thinking."

This is fairly amazing: The White House insisted that OLC include a footnote that would (inaccurately) suggest that the CIA techniques were legal, on the threat that the opinion would not be accepted. (Mayer also notes that the footnote referred only to written OLC advice, not oral -- because Dan Levin had heard rumors that John Yoo had orally approved the use of mind-altering drugs and mock burials, which Levin thought were plainly unlawful.)

more at:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2008/07/this-tells-you-basically-everything-you.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Justice Department is just part of the house staff of the BFEE.
I bet they make Mukasey use the servant's entrance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Or, to summarize even further:
"Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law." -Aleister Crowley
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Bush Administration emulates a satanist.
It's very fitting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-18-08 01:33 AM
Response to Original message
5. Mock burials?
That's a new one. So, is a 'mock' burial analogous to a 'simulated' drowning? x(

Good grief, what other torture horrors are they still hiding?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC