Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters: Networks again refuse to go on the record about NY Times' military analyst exposé

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:17 PM
Original message
Media Matters: Networks again refuse to go on the record about NY Times' military analyst exposé
Networks again refuse to go on the record about NY Times' military analyst exposé


Summary: ABC, CBS, and NBC have still not reported on any of their news programs The New York Times' revelations about the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon. Further, the major broadcast networks and cable news networks all reportedly declined to discuss the issue for an NPR report; the networks similarly reportedly declined to participate in an April 24 PBS NewsHour segment on the issue.

Continuing their silence, the major broadcast networks and cable news networks all reportedly declined to discuss the April 20 New York Times front-page article on the hidden ties between media military analysts and the Pentagon on the record with NPR media correspondent David Folkenflik. Further, according to a search* of transcripts available in the Nexis database, the broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS, and NBC -- still had not reported on the revelations in the Times story on any of their news programs through May 1. According to the Project for Excellence in Journalism's (PEJ) News Coverage Index, there were "only two related stories in the week of April 21-27, both of them in the April 24 PBS NewsHour broadcast." As Media Matters for America previously noted, the three major broadcast networks -- ABC, CBS, and NBC -- and the three major cable news networks -- CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC -- all reportedly declined to participate in a segment on the April 24 edition of PBS' NewsHour about "the role of military analysts on TV and in the Pentagon."

In a May 1 segment on NPR's All Things Considered, Folkenflik reported that "the New York Times story has stirred discomfort within network news divisions already bruised by the media's failure to challenge the administration before the invasion over claims Iraq had weapons of mass destruction" and that "ews executives and consultants wouldn't comment for this story, but privately say their on-air comments were honestly held beliefs," an assertion disputed by several of the analysts quoted in the Times article. Folkenflik also quoted former CBS News president Andrew Heyward blaming the Pentagon: "There was a deliberate attempt to deceive the public by having analysts whose real allegiance was to the Pentagon and who apparently were given at least special access for that allegiance, were presented as analysts whose allegiance was to the networks and therefore to the public."

Folkenflik further reported that NPR managing editor Brian Duffy said, "We're reviewing our commentators agreement to basically tighten up the language on that so that we are asking more rigorous questions about anyone that we're paying as a consultant."

more...

http://mediamatters.org/items/200805020010?f=h_top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mabus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Incredible. Just incredible
yet, so believable and not unexpected.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indenturedebtor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. They're all traitors to the Constitution
One of the great coups of the pukes has been to get the phrase "It's just a document" into the public consciousness. Opens the door to all sorts of fascist and treasonous acts.

Hang em says I!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And many of them are fully aware of the connotations and consequences
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. There's been some discussion here and elswhere about the fate
of newspapers in this electronic age. I'll tell you what will get me to turn off the TV "news" (though I find I am able to stomach less and less of it) and pick up the newspaper again and that's if the newspapers would give me real journalism and truth. That NYT article was a step in the right direction and the broadcast "news" media ignoring the report only feeds the fire of contempt I hold for them.

I only continue to watch broadcast "news" in a "know thine enemy" context anymore, waiting to see what they have up there sleeves next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. Washington has blood on its hands. We're asking them to admit their own complicity.
It's never going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Interesting exercise...google "CNN + Military PsyOps" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 06:50 PM
Response to Original message
7. They knew and they've been caught
Edited on Mon May-05-08 06:51 PM by malaise
News my ass. You expect them to condemn themselves. Fuck M$M the enablers.

Expect them to invite them again -new ones - in jackets and ties to hide the military connection.

add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC