Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who do you think was the worst president ever?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:12 PM
Original message
Poll question: Who do you think was the worst president ever?
This is what historians think http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3120489#3120500

I vote for Buchanan as the worst with Bush a close second.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nixon did a lot of good things in office, even if no one wants to admit it
Still a crook though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. True but he disgraced the office permanently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. No, Nixon signed a lot of legislation that would have been overriden if he had vetoed it
When people talk about how great Nixon was they forget about the FBI harassment of civil rights and anti-war groups, his escalation of Vietnam, his secret war in Cambodia, and his installation of Pinochet in Chile. If you think Nixon was a good President, you need to read up on the Church Committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. who would you rather have?
Nixon, Bush, or Reagan?

Nixon would be far preferable. Bush the Juniorth is by far the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. That's taking three turds and asking me to pick one of them
And in all honesty I might pick Bush Jr. if he had to deal with the Democratic Congress that Nixon did. Bush has been so destructive largely because he has had Tom DeLay and Bill Frist to do his bidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
77. True, but all turds are not equal, some float to the top, some sink to the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. He wasn't good
He just did a few good things, unlike the others who are classified near the bottom of presidential rankings. If it weren't for Watergate he wouldn't be down there with Hoover, Buchanan, Harding, Fillmore, and company. He would probably be considered average to below average.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. No doubt it will end up being Barack Obama.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. It is hard to predict presidential performance before someone sits in the Oval Office
Predictions about Obama being "great" or "bad" are meaningless. There is no way to predict presidential performance prior to them actually stepping into the job. Even his inexperience is more of an electoral liability than a hindrance to having a good presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
61. It sure won't be Hillary
Got to be president to make the list, good or bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dubya, then Rayguns n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. These results are shocking, this whole thread is shocking.
People putting down Republicans? On DU?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
5. Booooosh.
I don't think our country has been on the precipice of imploding like this before, has it? Has it ever been THIS BAD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Buchanan (Civil War), Hoover (Great Depression)
Other presidents like Fillmore, Harding, Pierce, and Andrew Johnson sucked but none of them caused the long-term damage that Buchanan, Hoover, and Bush did. Bush has a shot at not making it to 43rd but it would take a miracle for him to break the top 40. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. I personally think
we're THIS CLOSE to another Great Depression.

And I think it may be far worse because of how global the world is today.

During the Great Depression, I don't think so many other countries owned huge hunks of our land and businesses, nor did we owe a country like China trillions of dollars. Just think this will be the worst ever period in our country's history. And to really strap on the :tinfoilhat: I'm not certain there's even much of a future for our country as we know it.

The Civil War is hard to "top", but again, I think the end result and repercussions of our current situation will be more devastating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
52. I won't pass historical judgement on a remote possibility that hasn't happened yet.
As of right now Buchanan is worse and so is Pierce.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #52
63. And I'll defer to those of you who
know better than I. And do some research on those other bastards -- I obviously didn't pay attention in school. :7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. The fact of the matter is I don't see 25% unemployment, 10,000 bank failures,
a 60% decline in GDP, etc in our future. If the Fed had not intervened we could well have gotten there, but that's the whole reason the Fed is empowered to the extent it is. The primary goal of the Fed is to promote stability in the banking system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #70
73. I hope you're right --
and I wish I had the faith in the Fed that you do. I'll hope for the best.

Signed,

:tinfoilhat:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #70
83. You And Me Both, Zynx
There are enough safeguards in place to prevent another 1929. Not that this won't be a bumpy ride, but we're not going to hit the bridge abuttment.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. Bush. It's not even close.
And, god help me for saying this, but Nixon had some good accomplishments...the overtures to China and the Soviet Union, the establishment of the Environment Protection Agency.

There was nothing positive in Bush's Presidency. It was fear, a complete disregard for the Constitution and a war he lied us into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Buchanan, by a whisker
Of course, the meter is still running on Dubya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Yup. Invading Iran would seal the deal for Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #15
34. it might seal the deal for all of us
it would turn all of the networks back into 24-hr war networks.

How do you think the American people would react to a bungled attack on Iran that turns the entire world upside down?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. W, definitely. I put Andrew Johnson below Buchanan. Nixon, too.
Buchanan's incompetent dithering allowed us to hang on until Lincoln. If he had actually tried to do something, he might have precipitated the Civil War early - disaster.

Andrew Johnson was a frigging racist SOB who would have been more than happy to have the blacks exterminated after the war. Grant is usually ranked near the bottom, but he kept the Federal troops in the South throughout his two terms to protect the freed slaves. And that was absolutely necessary.

Nixon extended the war in Vietnam and corrupted the Constitution.

Always great fodder for debate for us history buffs. But there's only one George W. Bush, and the scary thing is, he's not finished with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. The only thing that could save Dubya's presidency now is if he found the cure for cancer
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:37 PM by galaxy21
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. He can't even spell it.
Bush and science?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #27
48. Maybe if he used Stem Cells he could do it
Oh yeah, um, never mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. Or Died of It in The next 3 weeks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Good point about Grant
He was also hurt by corruption. Still I think Grant gets more of a bad rap than he deserves. He is not a top 30 president but he doesn't deserve to be down there with the likes of Harding and Johnson. Fortunately for Grant, while he is considered to have been a weak president he remains one of the most revered Americans due to his military services during the Civil War. Don't expect to ever see Bush on the $50 bill. ;)

Johnson definitely ranks down there. I can't believe I forgot to include him in the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:21 PM
Response to Original message
14. We're really too close to fairly judge, but the case for Bush is fucking rock solid.
Immense failures in every single aspect. Foreign and domestic policy alike.

It's hard to argue that any other president has cut such a wide ranging swath of destruction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
16. Franklin Pierce was supposed to be the worst before Dubya,

and guess who is related to him??

Barbara Bush ! :rofl: I'm not kidding!! It runs in the family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Pierce was awful, but also such a tragic figure.
His only child, his young son, was killed in a train accident before his and his wife's eyes on their way to Washington. Neither ever recovered fully. He was also alcoholic.

He and Nathaniel Hawthorne were best of friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
38. I also believe, I read once, he was thrown in to the air from his saddle
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:59 PM by Uncle Joe
coming down on the saddle horn squishing his testicles and causing him much misery for the rest of his life. I don't remember where I read it or if it's true.

Edit for P.S. I believe this occurred during The Mexican War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. that is awful n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #28
51. I'm sorry, but I will not forgive his terrible performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #51
54. Didn't mean you should.
He was a bad president. Doesn't mean we can't recognize his personal tragedy, as well. Just human interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
17. We haven't seen the long term results of Bush's policies to make that decision yet
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:24 PM by Hippo_Tron
Frankly I think right now Reagan is worse because without Reagan there would be no Bush. That is the kind of thing you can look at with hindsight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. The others may have blundered around here and there ...



But Shit-for-Brains went out of his way to intentionally disrupt and destroy everything that made our government work. And that is why I want to see him and his co-conspirators do hard time in a federal penitentiary for a long long time.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. Reagan.
It's all his fault because he started the downhill slide into the abyss we are currently mired in. And at least everyone agrees that bush is an ineffective moran. But there are still Reagan devotees and minions out there who would put him on Mt. Rushmore if they could. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grytpype Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
23. It's hard to compare a 21st Century president with a 19th Century one.
The country and the presidency were totally different then.

It's true Buchanan failed to stop the Civil War, but the presidency was pretty weak at that time. And it's hard to imagine Bush doing any better in the same situation, but that would be conjecture.

Comparing him to the more modern "worst presidents," Hoover and Harding, is a more valid comparison, and he's clearly worse than both of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #23
32. Someone like Zachery Taylor or Andrew Jackson likely could have kept the union together
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
43. I doubt it
the break was coming, the best anyone could have done was postpone it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:48 PM
Original message
Indeed, Jackson did keep the union together during the nullifcation crisis
It is true the presidency was weaker during Buchanan's time but one of the common threads between the great/near-great presidents is that they rise to the challenge at hand, even if that means increasing the power of the presidency (Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, TR, and FDR).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
25. Ronald Reagan, Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Andrew Jackson should be choices
voted GWB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #25
53. Yeah, I was surprised at the lack of Jackson here (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
devilgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #53
66. Yes, Jackson wasn't all that and neither was Millard Fillmore
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
67. Jackson is considered by historians to have been a near-great/good president
Coolidge is considered average/below average. Hence they are not on the list. Harding is always ranked near the bottom but he didn't really do much damage so I didn't include him. I didn't include Reagan because Bush is basically a worse version of Reagan.

Here are historical rankings of presidents http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_rankings_of_United_States_Presidents
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
29. Actually a case could be made for Buchanan
remember, Bush** is really only the Resident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noirceuil Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. Jimmy Carter was Awful....
Not the worst in history, but awful nevertheless. Double digit inflation, high gas prices, the Iran Hostage crisis, inept foreign policy, and the list goes on and on. His presidency served no purpose except to give Republicans control of the White House for 12 years. He's a great man, a great humanitarian, but a horrible President. The fact that he has endorsed Obama, tells me all I need to know about what kind of leader Obama will be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Presidents don't control inflation and gas prices
Inflation was due to guns and butter from the Nixon/Johnson/Ford days. Carter put Paul Volcker in charge of the federal reserve and he ultimately got inflation under control after Carter was out of office. Gas prices were due to OPEC. Carter had absolutely no control over that. Raygun got extremely lucky and OPEC collapsed while he was in office and gas prices were low.

And Carter handled the Iran Hostage Crisis in a manner that didn't lead us into a war with Iran.

He also had the foresight to warn us about how dangerous our addiction to foreign oil was. And that was in 1979. Imagine where we would be if we had listened to Carter and gotten serious about renewable energy back then instead of waiting 30 years to finally start doing what he was talking about back then. Carter installed solar panels on the White House and Raygun took them down once he was elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Traction311 Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #31
71. Presidents have nothing to do with gas prices?
So I should stop blaming Shrub for the current high prices?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hangingon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
46. A truely nice man but a disaster as a President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. I Voted Bush
partly because I simply don't know enough about Buchanan. Although if his inaction led directly to the Civil War, that would constitute a pretty strong case for worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
35. Bush Is The Only One With NO Redeeming Features At All
He's not even a good son and father and husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #35
47. Yeah, rumours are Laura can't stand him
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 07:01 PM by galaxy21
I think you can tell their marraige is mostly an act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #35
50. Buchanan was nothing but a failed public servant.
He didn't have a family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
37. Fucking up stuff and being an asshole are the two areas that this clown
has got covered. He has this down. Since 2000 he's been on a tear and he's done both. Non-stop. No one's ever done it any better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunkerbuster1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. Woodrow Wilson.
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 05:58 PM by bunkerbuster1
Racist, war pig, got more Americans killed for no reason at all than any other President. I don't care that he was some strategerific Gene Yuss who had big, fancy-ass ideas for some prototype of the UN that never came to fruition. Guy was scum.

Worst ever.

Nixon and Bush ain't far behind, of course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MessiahRp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
40. Barbara Bush's relative Franklin Pierce could have made this list
But I still vote for W. I can't imagine anybody doing more things wrong. Some leaders fuck up the economy, some fuck with our civil liberties, some fuck up in war... most of the worst didn't do all three. Bush did them plus some. Worst, EVER.

Rp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brigid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
41. Bush, of course.
That's a no-brainer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
42. Pierce was supposedly pretty shitty
and a direct ancestor of W not ironically...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galledgoblin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 06:56 PM
Response to Original message
44. if Hoover and Buchanan catch too much flack for their presidencies because of
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 06:58 PM by galledgoblin
the environment and tactics they inherited from previous administrations, does that mean GWB is less to blame than Reagan or GHWB (or maybe even, Clinton?!)


I personally think GWB is unique in that he did have the opportunity to turn things around, or at least maintain the status quo and let the shit hit the fan under whoever we will elect next (the Iraq War will be considered one of the greatest mistakes by a president EVER), but I want to hear some other opinions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
49. I think Franklin Pierce was the worst. After all he did preside over the Kansas-Nebraska Act.
Nothing in this country compares to the ravages of the Civil War.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
55. I'd split this by period
modern period, George of course... hell Nixon was an excellent Presnit compared to this idiot... and Hoover was at least honest (he didn't give a shit)

of course the 19th century it is close between Grant and Buchanan...

But yes, overall, I think George will get it.

Hey, HE IS NUMBER ONE ON SOMETHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
56. Bush and Andrew Jackson are running neck and neck...
Honestly Jackson should be on the list for sure. Ever hear of the Trail of Tears?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galaxy21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:34 PM
Response to Reply #56
57. Hey, Jackson fought 13 duels over his wife's honour
I don't know enough to comment on him as a president, but that's sort of cool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. Well there is nothing sort of cool about the fact that he engaged in genocide...
Thousands of Native Americans died because of his actions, he may well have the worst human rights record of any American President although Bush is giving him competition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Inquisitive Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #62
65. Yea but the difference was Andrew Jackson essentially succeeded!
I mean at least he 'put them (Seminole Nation) in their place'.

:sarcasm: (just in case)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #57
68. Barack Obama on Jackson
Obama praised four Democratic presidents: Jefferson, Jackson, FDR and JFK. He said Jackson "took the White House back for the people." That is high praise indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gauguin57 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
58. On behalf of the people of Lancaster County, PA (where Buchanan lived, practiced law and is buried)
Thank you for voting for Bush before "Old Buck." We're tired of having the crappiest president on every historian's list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
59. This thread is like a rock band yelling "SPRINGFIELD IS THE GREATEST TOWN EVER!"
It's a guaranteed applause-getter. Post whore! (just kidding :hi:)

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fox Mulder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
60. George W Bush will go down as the worst president in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
64. No one has done more to promote anti-intellectualism than *
He has put America on a downward trend of willful ignorance, blind apathy, and made it possible for people to be comfortable with their own prejudices against intellectual idealism and embrace low brow culture. When world leaders openly call him an idiot and a moron you know he has zero respect among the global community and had dragged America down to his level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
69. Don't have to wait for history's verdict. The evidence is already overwhelming.
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 10:01 PM by Canuckistanian
Besides, what as yet unknown BUSH horrors are waiting to be discovered during the NEXT few decades??

Think about it - the stories WE KNOW ABOUT have all gotten past the most SECRETIVE ADMINISTRATION in history.

Unless we see smoke rising from Cheney's office on Jan. 20th, 2009 or they blow fuses from too many paper-shredders going at once, there's a LOT more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snarkturian Clone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-08-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
72. Warren G. Harding
At least the other presidents got up in the morning and worked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
74. Truman should've been on there
since he killed millions when he didn't need to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #74
78. Millions?
I might give you 200,000, a hundred thousand per A-Bomb, but "millions" seems a little over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Kerry VonErich Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #78
79. maybe I was over the top.
oops
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadinMo Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
75. Bush.
And the historians will snicker and say, "You know, they actually 'elected' him to two terms! Maybe they all were dimwits!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LanternWaste Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
76. I'm trying to be as non-biased as I can
I'm trying to be as non-biased as I can, but it still leads me right back to Shrub. Up until his administration sneaked in, I would have put down Harding (Teapot Dome, having a mistress committed to an asylum to shut her up, etc.), but it's difficult not to point our fingers directly at Shrub for the number one spot.

The BEST case scenario is that the largest intelligence failure happened on his watch resulting in the greatest loss of civilian life in America by an outside para-military organization ever.

That in and of itself would be the swan song for any President. But we also have Iraq, the recession, the housing crises, Enron, and the insider administration scandals (Plame, the emails, etc).

It's difficult not to point our fingers directly at this administration and present him with the ribbon for Worst President. Ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
80. Andrew Johnson did his best to reverse the outcome of the civil war.
Fortunately, there was a congress then that, at least, slowed down the introduction of Jim Crow and de facto slavery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
81. Should really add Cheney to that list as I think he dictated
more crap than Bush....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BarbaRosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-10-08 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
82. This is like asking which is worse
Edited on Thu Apr-10-08 09:48 AM by BarbaRosa
stepping in dog poop, stepping in cat poop, stepping in dog puke, or stepping in cat puke.:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC