Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Was the Spitzer scandal "reverse engineered" from a wiretap?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 10:58 PM
Original message
Was the Spitzer scandal "reverse engineered" from a wiretap?
Edited on Mon Mar-10-08 11:03 PM by johnfunk
... perhaps an illegal wiretap? APJ links to a few questions from Jane Hamsher
  1. Why would the bank tell the IRS and not Spitzer himself if there was a suspicious transfer?
  2. What is a USA doing prosecuting a prostitution case? This isn't normally what the feds spend their time with.
  3. Why did they then include this line [he" (believed to be a reference to Client-9) "would ask you to do things that, like, you might not think were safe... ] from that conversation in the complaint?
  4. How did Spitzer's name get leaked to the media, and who did it?
... and the questions don't stop there...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. That was my first thought...'NSA illegal wiretap' reveals info
they use that info to get the goods then use the goods to get a warrant...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. ...
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C07E4DA163BF937A25757C0A9629C8B63

snip-

State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer criticized the Federal Communications Commission on Tuesday, saying it has failed to close a loophole that allows criminals to evade surveillance by using new wireless and Internet technologies not covered by a decade-old federal wiretapping law.

Mr. Spitzer wants the commission to compel communications companies to build surveillance capabilities into cellphones that use new technology, and into the new Internet-based telephone services. That puts Mr. Spitzer, a Democrat who is said to be considering a run for governor, in step with the Bush administration's Justice Department and Federal Bureau of Investigation, which have similarly asked the commission for the change.


snip-

Mr. Spitzer recently joined with Gov. George E. Pataki, a Republican, in proposing new legislation that would expand the state's wiretapping powers. The proposal is opposed by some Democrats in the Assembly.

-snip

He deserves what he gets. What an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingOfLostSouls Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. same here
miers and bolton getting served to testify before congress and held in contempt and suddenly, low and behold, the governor of new york, a potential future presidential candidate, gets exposed as banging prostitutes.


the more you read into it and kinda see the half smiles and winks and nods from the talking heads, its reeking to high hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. pass this to Hamsher
Mrs. Greenspan made a very interesting remark today. She noted, with grim visage, that this is an inopportune time to lose the NY governor because of the trouble between the bond market, the stock market, the sub-prime, etc. -- the governor had been the point man for negotiations.

Get the transcript and parse it. Very, very interesting coming from Mrs. Greenspan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-10-08 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, maybe....
Spitzer was caught on a *federal wiretap* arranging to meet in a Washington hotel room the night before Valentine's Day with a prostitute from a call-girl business known as the Emperors Club VIP, according to a law enforcement official who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because the investigation is still going on.

MORE: http://apnews.excite.com/article/20080311/D8VAVKR01.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Which is a distortion because HE was the focus, not the Emperors Club.
They are trying to make it seem that he was accidentally picked up in the investigation. He was the target from the getgo. But millions will remain with that first, false impression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. He was the target. Feds got a warrant to secure bank records via Emperors Club escort.
There is something fishy going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Finally, we get past the schadenfreude and THINK.
The project to disgrace and depose democratically-elected Democratic officeholders continues unabated.

Bill Clinton was perhaps their first project. But not their last. So much easier to depose leaders without a messy impeachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. You make an excellent point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. MORE! Digby adds a question...
Edited on Tue Mar-11-08 08:46 AM by johnfunk
... and a telling one, at that!
I'm just wondering when exactly last year that permission was sought. Rove and Gonzales both resigned in August of 07 under a cloud for a plot to fire US Attorneys who refused to trump up charges of "voter fraud" and pursue cases against Democratic politicians. Mukasey was sworn in in November. Peter D. Keisler was acting attorney general during the interim. Which one ordered the investigation?
Read the full blog entry here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnfunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. MORE! Attorney Scott Horton has a LOT of questions...
Where's the press on this stuff?
[T]here is a second tier of questions that needs to be examined with respect to the Spitzer case. They go to prosecutorial motivation and direction. Note that this prosecution was managed with staffers from the Public Integrity Section at the Department of Justice. This section is now at the center of a major scandal concerning politically directed prosecutions. During the Bush Administration, his Justice Department has opened 5.6 cases against Democrats for every one involving a Republican. Beyond this, a number of the cases seem to have been tied closely to election cycles. Indeed, a study of the cases out of Alabama shows clearly that even cases opened against Republicans are in fact only part of a broader pattern of going after Democrats. So here are the rather amazing facts that surface in the Spitzer case:

  1. The prosecutors handling the case came from the Public Integrity Section.
  2. The prosecution is opened under the White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910. You read that correctly. The statute itself is highly disreputable, and most of the high-profile cases brought under it were politically motivated and grossly abusive. ...
More! Go read it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I'm thinking, they couldn't prosecute because of the handling. SO, they tie in the prostitution,...
,...thing.

That is what I am thinking.

Thanks for the site. Good reading! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
12. Recommended. Highly recommended! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theboss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-11-08 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. These are stupid questions
1. That's the point of the law. You don't tell the person, "Hey! Just in case you are doing something illegal, we are going to report you."

2. The case went across state lines.

3. Prosecutors live to take little shots at defendants in complaints.

4. I don't even understand this question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC