Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT:KRUGMAN: "Memory Lane" Sobering Graph of Home Sales vs. Recessionary Cycles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:28 AM
Original message
NYT:KRUGMAN: "Memory Lane" Sobering Graph of Home Sales vs. Recessionary Cycles
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 05:29 AM by El Pinko

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/29/memory-lane/

The Conscience of a Liberal
Paul Krugman

January 29, 2008, 11:42 am
Memory lane
Remember when those of us who argued that the United States was in the midst of a serious housing bubble were ridiculed, and told that we were simply motivated by irrational Bush-hatred? Ah, memories.





:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Not very comforting.
Good graph. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. why no shaded area
for the start of the 2007 recession?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not official yet.
We never know that we are in a recession until we are well into it. At least 6 months (by definition). And with the ways the definition has been jimmied with, possibly more than a year passes before our "economists" recognize we are in an official recession.

Most of the rest of us have it figured out a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. "Technically" we're not in recession yet.
It's a fait acompli that we will be in one, but economists define a recession as back-to-back quarters of less than 2% GDP growth. Very few would argue that it's pretty much a given, but it's not official at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. 2% Growth? Or Negative Growth?
I thought it was negative growth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Pinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:30 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. YOu're right, 2 quarters of negative growth - my bad.
Here's a good encapsulation of the definition of a recession.

http://economics.about.com/cs/businesscycles/a/depressions.htm

I don't know where that 2% came from - must have heard it somewhere...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. If you give out money that you don't have so that people can spend it
to s(t)imulate economic growth and jigger the numbers, does that count?

The economic policies of the bush mis-administration are nothing but a one way road to a dead end. It is just a matter of time before the grim reaper knocks on the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. The more the difference between the previous high and the
recessionary low, the longer the recession.

This one is going to be a huge difference.

Yikes. 4 to 5 year recession? That would make it a depression? No? Especially if the currency becomes worthless (hyper inflation due to current dollar weakness and pressure for the central banks to keep lending, drawing on US Treasury to do so... which must increase the money supply, and since they won't be able to do so by floating more debt, they will get it by "inventing" more money). Just to keep the plates spinning.

Thanks, George.

Can we say Gold $2000/ounce by a year or two? Real Estate will no longer be an anti-inflationary hedge as the market corrects and sheds about 1/3 of the value (from the highs) for the homeowner. People will look for anything that holds it's value. Not to mention that if the Fed raises rates anytime soon, it would send the markets crashing worse than anything we have ever seen. So you can forget the so-called soft landing scenarios.

Crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 27th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC