Wolf Blitzer: "I think it was the best debate because there were only three candidates"

[mudesi]

He just said that. Not 20 seconds ago.

:puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke::puke:

[SoCalDem]

1. Number 1..They are not "debates".. they are televised arguments

:grr:

[Mass]

2. Terrible debate. All about show biz, not issues.

[EFerrari]

3. Too bad Wolf hasn't learned how to count on one hand yet. n/t

[melody]

4. Wolf hasn't learned to walk upright yet

That counting stuff, well, that's hard.

[AndyA]

5. And if it was the best with three, it'll be even better when it's just two.

His owners have already told him he will love just two candidates better than three.

[lurky]

6. The best of all are when it's just Wolfie

on stage asking himself questions. No distractions. No interruptions. Nothing but Wolfie.

[avaistheone1]

7. Actually the quality of the debate was better when we had more candidates.

It was more intense and suspenseful. You never new what might happen. imo