Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nixon resignation and pardon shows impeachment catch-22

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:17 PM
Original message
Nixon resignation and pardon shows impeachment catch-22
If we impeach Cheney, Bush will pardon him. If we did a serial impeachment with Cheney first, whoever Bush appoints VP who becomes president would pardon both. I get the impression that even if Pelosi got in, SHE would pardon the whole bunch.

This is one of the stronger arguments against impeachment--that if we wait and lie low, we can criminally prosecute these guys which will have more real world consequences.

I don't know if that is even going to happen.

At the very least, shouldn't their be a law or even constitutional amendment limiting the pardon power, so presidents and governors couldn't use it as a get out of jail free card for those in their administrations?

What would be great is a bill proposing this on Bush's desk before his term is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. The best things that came out of that were the investigations
...we found out a LOT about the crimes of the Nixonians. Same could happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. There is no pardon for impeachment
Nixon resigned before he was impeached. Then he was pardoned.

Had Nixon been impeached, Ford would not have been able to pardon him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. pardon for the underlying crimes to prevent criminal prosecution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Correct.
The OP is based on a false stance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frogger Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Sure he would have been able to.
It's only the impeachment that can't be pardoned. Any accessory crimes can be. Where'd you go to school?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Evidently, I went to a school that teaches reading skills (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. ...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frogger Donating Member (217 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. But no history n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrCoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Impeachment does not end with criminal prosecution
it ends with removal from office. Criminal charges (if warranted) can follow after impeachment, but charges aren't required.

Don't confuse impeachment with a criminal trial. They are two separate proceedings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Another alternative
which is unpalatable in a big way is to grant them all immunity on condition ALL the truth comes out. They can't plead the fifth in that case and by then the power over the evidence will have passed to a new President so that immunity can't be used as a convenient sucker ploy- again.

A Truth Commission of sorts with legislative consequences. Also it may be a tool to unseat crooked judges and other entrenched cronies no longer bound in a protective circle of mutual fifth amendment conspiracies. It can be used to at least dissolve Blackwater, removes protections from rogue corporations and other horrors like the BCCI bank scandal. Fewer trials, fewer crooks in jail but more substantive swift change. Otherwise it would cost plenty in time and money to nail a few for a little and miss most.
The only justice available at all is in truth and change. if Obama really means reconciliation, and I think truly he is not anywhere close to this level, he would see the nation desperately needs this purging and healing whatever the prospects are for impeachments and criminal trials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. How about unseating a fascist Supreme Court justice, Alito?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. I was one who originally said don't take the time to impeach, but
it's obvious that no other administration has broken and obstructed the laws and systems as much as this one and insteand of thinking successes in getting the impeachment or a pardon - it's necessary to get the evidence and their excuses out there for the history books. It is something that is going to go on for years and years anyway. Start the investigation and do it for the purpose of an impeachment. It has never been more deserved. We are not a real country unless we do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-16-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. we are a country, but not a real democracy. THE SHOCK DOCTRINE has sad parallel in Argentina...
After the military junta was removed, the democratically elected government was reluctant to prosecute anyone because they knew the same powers behind the throne were still in play, and they could tell the generals to stomp democracy again if they got too uppity.

The good thing here is the military, FBI, and CIA foot soldiers would be unlikely to cooperate with any persecution to protect Bush & Cheney. The bad side is, their mercenaries and friends in the Mossad and Saudi and Pakistani intelligence could blow some shit up, blame terrorists, and provide a nice distraction for Bush & Cheney at the very least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 09th 2024, 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC