Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kucinich At Dartmouth: "Why Should We Wait?"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:33 AM
Original message
Kucinich At Dartmouth: "Why Should We Wait?"
Presidential Hopeful Pushes Impeachment At Dartmouth Forum

Hanover, New Hampshire - November 26, 2007

VIDEO AT: http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/28963

A month ago, a Channel 3 News poll found Vermonters favor the impeachment of the president and vice president by a margin of nearly two to one.

Monday night, the leader of that initiative in Congress spoke at Dartmouth. Rep. Dennis Kucinich, a Democrat from Ohio, is running for president. But the forum in Hanover, N.H., was not just getting into the White House -- it was about getting the current occupant out.

"Our constitution is in trouble," Kucinich said. "Are we supposed to wait for George Bush and Dick Cheney to attack Iran before we take action? We can't wait. They're already rattling the sabers of war against another nation. They lied to get us into a war against Iraq. They're lying to push us into war with Iran. Why should we wait?"

Kucinich has sponsored two resolutions in Congress to impeach Vice President Dick Cheney: H. Res. 333 and H. Res. 799. He said he's drafting an extended version relating to President Bush. It's an issue that has divided Democrats. But more than a hundred people who gathered for the forum were on his side.

............

more at:
http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=7412512&nav=menu183_9_6_2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. The people ARE on his side
...it's the lace-panty bunch in DC that are too scared to anger Dubya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is it "preventive impeachment"?
Worried about what Bush and Cheney "might" do in Iran? Has Kucinich lost his mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I don't understand your post
Do you support or oppose impeachment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I oppose impeachment.
Edited on Tue Nov-27-07 11:50 AM by robcon
But Dennis wants to impeach, according to his speech, to prevent what Bush/Cheney "might" do in Iran. That's "1984" and thought-police thinking.

Is he in favor of indicting (another word for impeaching) people now who "might" commit crimes in the future? The OP "Why Should We Wait?" is revealing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Do you support removing impeachment from the constitution?
The only logical conclusion one can get from not impeaching the most impeachable presidency in your life would be that you are opposed to that constitutional protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. If that's the "only logical conclusion" your world is certainly a strange one.
I think Pelosi's justification, that a failed impeachment drive will only help the Repugs in '08 Congressional and Presidential elections, is also a "logical conclusion." I suspect you are logic-deprived, though, mmonk, so you probably don't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bullshit. Impeach NOW. Go DK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riqster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I see now
Actually, he has been pushing for impeachment for well over a year now, and it isn't Iran-driven. The context for the remark you are responding to is: most of the other Dem Congresscritters didn't favor impeaching until AFTER Bush invades Iran: DK's response is that we already have enough impeachable offenses to go on with, and it is not necessary to wait until after some invasion that might or might not happen.

DK does have a habit of going into great detail on a topic once, and cutting it back on repetition: this is a classic example of that phenomenon. He needs to work on that IMNSHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Thats how I read it as well
Dennis is continuing to make sense, but that doesn't stop the haters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes, but ass-smooching "moderates" don't buy that logical "accountability" jive n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoleil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah
'cause if they impeach Bush (a Repub), based on innumerable impeachable offenses, there will be a disaster in the '08 election, the Democrats will lose big time and another Repub will be elected.

See, just like it happened in '00: after impeaching Clinton (a Democrat) based on no impeachable offenses whatsoever, the Repubs lost big time in '00.

The logic is impeccable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-27-07 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. You haven't heard their rhetoric about Iran?
:shrug: Are you kidding?

YES!! Stop them before they can do more harm!!!

No, he's been in favor of impeaching them for the crimes they've already committed!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC