Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kids’ Bracelet Contains Extremely Toxic Cadmium --press release & alert

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:14 AM
Original message
Kids’ Bracelet Contains Extremely Toxic Cadmium --press release & alert
USWNEWS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Nov. 13, 2007

Contacts: Connie Mabin, USW, 412-562-2616 or [email protected], Judy Braiman of Empire State Consumer Association, 585-383-1317; or Dr. Kathleen Burns of Sciencecorps, [email protected]

Kids’ Bracelet Contains Extremely Toxic Cadmium

CSPC not interested in “new public health threat”

PITTSBURGH - The United Steelworkers (USW) today said the latest toxic toy discovery – extremely high levels of poisonous cadmium in an imported kids’ charm bracelet – is more proof that the nation’s failed trade policies and a broken regulatory system are putting children at risk and must immediately be fixed.
The troubling discovery is the latest in a toxic import crisis in which dangerous products such as poisoned pet food, lead-laced baby bibs and toys, red-leaded steel and counterfeit electrical circuit breakers have flooded North America. More than 30 million toys alone have been recalled this year because of high levels of lead.

“It is appalling that another imported product could be poisoning our children. Lead, cadmium - no toxins have any place in our children’s products. This toy needs to be immediately recalled, but until our failed trade policies are remedied, our families are going to remain endangered,” said USW President Leo W. Gerard. His union has been screening toys for lead in the United States and Canada as part of the “Protect Our Kids – Stop Toxic Imports” campaign.

The USW was made aware of the metal bracelet by Dr. Kathleen Burns, a toxicologist who reviewed test results for Empire State Consumer Association, which has been evaluating toy safety since 1971. The laboratory test results documented small beads on the bracelet contained 227,000 parts per million of cadmium.

The Chinese-made bracelet was sold at Dollar Tree under the “Sassy Chic” brand name. According to the package, its item number is 873089 and it is distributed by Greenbrier International Inc. of Chesapeake, Va.

The U.S. Environmental Protective Agency’s standard for cadmium in drinking water is less than 1 part per million. And European law bans electronic products containing more than 100 parts per million of cadmium.

Cadmium is a toxic metal that can cause cancer, birth defects and damage to the reproductive system. Like lead, cadmium builds up in the body over time, causing cumulative damage, and is harmful even in low concentrations.

Dr. David O. Carpenter of the Institute for Health & the Environment at the University at Albany-SUNY said the toy that’s nearly 25 percent cadmium “raises a new public health threat.”

“The presence of such a high concentration of cadmium in a small bead that can be easily swallowed is clearly very dangerous. As with lead in toys and children's jewelry, attention needs to be given to the content of other toxic metals," Carpenter said.

Dr. Burns, director of the Massachusetts-based Sciencecorps, said, “Cadmium is a widely recognized hazardous metal that isn’t necessary in toys and shouldn’t be there. It can harm the workers who make the toys, children who play with them, and contaminate the area where the toys are disposed of.”

Gerard added, “What makes me even angrier is the inaction of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, which instead of working to immediately recall this product gave the Empire State Consumer Association a bureaucratic run around when they tried to report this disturbing discovery. How many more toxic toys have to end up on our store shelves and in the hands of our kids and grandkids before our government stops protecting big business and does something about this crisis?”

Judy Braiman, founder of the Empire State Consumer Association, tried to alert the CPSC about the cadmium finding and was told she could submit the results, but that the agency does not test for cadmium or consider it as toxic as lead. In fact it is very toxic, and the EPA has a limit on cadmium that is three times more stringent than the limit on lead in drinking water. Past cadmium poisoning incidents indicate that only a quarter of a gram may be fatal in child. Further analysis is necessary to determine the harm that could result from consuming the toy bracelet.

Braiman’s group today filed a complaint with the New York Attorney General’s Office and hopes to have the product immediately recalled. “I’m extremely angry because our government is very negligent in carrying out their responsibilities to protect people. Businesses must ensure the safety of their products and be held accountable for unsafe products. We should be making more children’s products in the United States,” Braiman said.

Burns said failures at the CPSC and the Centers for Disease Control to regulate product safety is a “near breakdown of public health protections from hazardous products. I hope that every one who cares about children will demand action on this public health problem.”

Since its launch in September, the USW’s “Stop Toxic Imports” campaign has helped hundreds of families screen toys and other products for lead. The campaign also aims to spread awareness about the toxic trade cycle that is endangering children and threatening jobs. More information is available at www.stoptoxicimports.org.

The USW represents 850,000 workers in the U.S. and Canada employed in the industries of metals, rubber, chemicals, paper, oil refining and the service sector. For more information: www.usw.org/

###########

In lieu of federal action, health organizations are testing children’s products to assess lead and other hazards. Last week a toy with 23% cadmium (by weight) in small easily ingested beads was identified and composition was confirmed on retest. Other metals included lead, arsenic, chromium, manganese, vanadium, and thallium, though in smaller quantities. CPSC was unresponsive to my call and to a call by the director of the organization that sponsored the testing and has supplied the Agency with results used as the basis for product recalls over the last 30 years. The USW was responsive and their press release below gives product details.

Minimal NLM, CDC, or Poison Control data are available on oral acute toxicity, but the lethal dose appears to be approximately 25 mg/kg (less than one quarter of a gram for a small child). The cadmium in a single bead may pose an acute toxicity risk, depending on bioavailability (which cannot be readily determined) and other factors. The CDC’s long-term exposure MRL is 0.0002 mg/kg (maximum two millionths of a gram per day for a 10 kg child). Cadmium accumulates in the body and damages multiple organ systems, most prominently the kidneys (proximal tubules). Extensive data are available on moderate to low level cadmium exposure effects via NLM and summary publications. We have some recent publications not accessible through NLM, including WHO’s 2003 review, and an EU report on the toxicity and bioavailability of elements in toys - provided on request. Testing methods and results also supplied if you are working on this problem.

We don’t know how many products contain cadmium or other highly toxic metals, since cadmium testing began recently and there is not broad chemical screening of toys. Agressive international actions have reduced cadmium use and controlled its distribution so that availability has declined in most areas. But it remains available as a byproduct of zinc mining and component of waste shipped to Asia and Africa for scrap recycling.

This posting is both an alert and request for information unavailable via standard publications:

- poisoning reports with quantified oral exposures (not already published)

- current paths of cadmium entry into the stream of commerce

- other reports of cadmium in toys or inadvertently in consumer products (e.g., not in pigments or batteries)

If you send information, please specify whether it can be made public. Collaboration on testing and evaluation is welcome. This is currently being done without any funding, but with the help of an accredited lab that offers discounted testing to nonprofits.

Kathleen Burns, Ph.D.
Director, Sciencecorps
Lexington, Massachusetts, USA

[email protected]

www.sciencecorps.org

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. Two hundred and twenty seven times the level deemed safe
:wow:

I'm getting books for my nieces and nephews this year, published in the United States (and thus without toxic inks or poisonous paper.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
2. CPSC means what now?
Judy Braiman, founder of the Empire State Consumer Association, tried to alert the CPSC about the cadmium finding and was told she could submit the results, but that the agency does not test for cadmium or consider it as toxic as lead. In fact it is very toxic, and the EPA has a limit on cadmium that is three times more stringent than the limit on lead in drinking water. Past cadmium poisoning incidents indicate that only a quarter of a gram may be fatal in child. Further analysis is necessary to determine the harm that could result from consuming the toy bracelet.

Braiman’s group today filed a complaint with the New York Attorney General’s Office and hopes to have the product immediately recalled. “I’m extremely angry because our government is very negligent in carrying out their responsibilities to protect people. Businesses must ensure the safety of their products and be held accountable for unsafe products. We should be making more children’s products in the United States,” Braiman said.

Burns said failures at the CPSC and the Centers for Disease Control to regulate product safety is a “near breakdown of public health protections from hazardous products. I hope that every one who cares about children will demand action on this public health problem.”


I hope so, too... but if citizens don't have lots of cash, their demands aren't considered a priority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
8.  Consumer Product Safety Commission N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Sorry... I was being facetious.
Since, you know... they're not overly concerned with actually protecting any consumers or anything.

Get it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. "Corporate Profits Supersede Children". nm
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 04:16 PM by dicksteele
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Hah.
Nice one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
3. Rich people don't shop at the discount stores - they just own them
I'm glad that I don't have children. I wouldn't know what to buy them that wasn't poisonous.

All the things I took for granted as I was growing up have vanished. I would not want to be a child today.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bracelets?
As a kid, I worked hours and hours to be able to buy the most expensive and luxuriant tubes of oil paint, the cadmium yellows, oranges, and reds. Even then, the tubes made in Italy and England and Germany were clearly marked that cadmium is a very dangerous toxin. I suppose today it's all made in China and recommends not over a tablespoon be put in your kids food twice within 4 hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. ppm? Try 22.7% -- i.e., it's an alloy of cadmium, prob. chosen for low melting point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't buy my daughter trinkets anymore
They're all poison in one way or another, from what I can see. Kids put jewelry in their mouths. They all do. I did when I was a kid (which might explain a few things . . . ) and they still do today. I'm getting tired of not being able to buy my daughter anything without having to worry about lead and what-not. Someone gave her little cute plastic plates and I'm afraid to use those too. My sister got some little necklace for her out of a vending machine and I had to throw it out. I just can't trust where this stuff comes from. Kids don't understand why they can't have these things but I have to protect her. It just makes me angry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. With Free Trade, we reap what we sow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
10. Thank god Clinton fast tracked China, and signed NAFTA
what would we do without low, low prices and poison in our kids toys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fierce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you, Steelworkers!
Keep up the good work!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuckessee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Jeez, what next?
It's safer to buy second hand older stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
13. The CPSC doesn't care about toxic children's toys BECAUSE:
only post-born babies can play with them and be sickened by them. CPSC is just following Bush doctrine in only caring about the pre-born babies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. A couple of questions.
1. Are food, drug, and consumer product recalls significantly increasing over the last couple of years?

2. Are Chinese products significantly more likely to be recalled than American or any other nationality when proportionally weighted for distribution of products?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. one wonders about the point of your questions.
toxic and dangerous products should be recalled immediately, regardless of source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. One wonders about the point of your argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. no need to wonder: we should be protected as consumers
I thought I was being fairly straitforward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Oh, it's very straightforward.
The point still escapes me though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. 14 replies, 2 recs.
What is wrong with that picture?

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cgrindley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
16. Cadmium is freaking awesome
give me a cadmium red or a cadmium yellow any day. Paranoia over paints just results in shitty art. Nothing compares to toxic metal paints... lead flake whites... real cadmiums... nothing. So what if it kills a few kids here and there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. Hope you're just kidding -- it's kinda dark to say "so what if it kills a few kids here and there?"
Edited on Wed Nov-14-07 03:51 PM by AikidoSoul
But I didn't see a sarcasm icon anywhere....

No matter how lovely the yellows and reds are, methinks you don't need "....227,000 parts per million of cadmium" to get nice colors.

For some perspective on the 227,000 parts per million:

"The U.S. Environmental Protective Agency’s standard for cadmium in drinking water is less than 1 part per million. And European law bans electronic products containing more than 100 parts per million of cadmium." (taken from the press release).

:think:








edit to add question mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. photo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Small pics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. The press release did not have a photo N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
19. talking to some nuns today, in line, at walmart. old, old with a walker in amarillo texas
and she is talking about this and not buying from china to her other nun friend, not quite so old. i told i am so glad you know about this. oh the shame she says, cannot buy from china, so many things. yes i say. it is a shame what has happened to this nation in the last 6 yrs. they are nodding in agreement as eyes pop open cause people in the panhandle of texas just does not talk this way, as we have the cashier and woman behind us glare.

she watches charlie gibson. every day. to stay informed.

it was cute

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Same brand (different product #) was recalled last month
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AuntPatsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. And yet to far to many if you ask me, abortion reigns high on their list of issues?
Priorities be damned, where have they gone? So many red alerts get a moment of clarity such as the above, but tomorrow, well, Cindy lou heard a bad word on tv last night and so congress must be informed immediately, Brittany broke a toe nail and so deserves at least an hour of a hearty debate why this is truly newsworthy for the average american nightly news junkie, also congress needs to stop them bad liberals from saying mean things about us morally "corecupt" conservatives and we demand hours of apologies be broadcast on live televised media outlets.

And the beat goes on, meanwhile isn't possible salmonella poisoning scares a huge distraction for the average consumer? Lets not tell them if we can help it.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-14-07 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. And this alert comes from a private organization
because government has failed miserably to protect.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC