Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

For those who claim Paul is principled: What's principled about wanting to condemn people to death?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:48 PM
Original message
For those who claim Paul is principled: What's principled about wanting to condemn people to death?
Paul wants to do away with OSHA and all other protections for workers. He wants to strip regulation from business. He wants to do away with all Federal environmental laws and protections. If he got his way, the elderly, children, women, minorities and others would suffer, and there would be a substantial increase in workplace deaths and deaths caused by other policies he'd like to enact. So tell me, how exactly is that principled?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. To the people who claim he's principled, the other issues don't matter
It's all about him being anti-war, they don't seem to mind his stances on other issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Well, a lot of people seem to claim he's principled outside of that
and what I'm getting to is so what? If your principles suck, what does it matter that you stand up for them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. In a world of lies, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.
He advocates for unpopular positions that he believes in.

To many that is radical, unprecedented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. His support here is nothing more than ignorance.
Edited on Mon Nov-12-07 01:55 PM by TwilightZone
Anyone who bothers to spend a few minutes reviewing his record and/or the Libertarian Party platform should realize that he's about as far from Democratic principles as it gets.

One stance on one issue does not a principled politician make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. "principle" is a neutral word
As a matter of fact, he sticks by his principles very well. The Libertarian principles of small (read "No") govt. No doubt his principles are neither yours nor mine.

Of course, I knew you were being sarcastic, but believe it or not, there are some people here who think that their belief systems are the only one's worthy of being called that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I think that principles that lead to suffering
and death of the most vulnerable among us, are hardly principles worth admiring. And that he stands by them doesn't make him admirable either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I agree 100%
But they are principles nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. He is principled, but the principles are evil ones
Hitler was principled. Many evil and dangerous people are, but the principles they adhere to are evil. It's absurd to admire or respect such people because they're principled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. exactly
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. who cares about those folks?
Ron Paul supporters don't care. They are out for theirs and theirs alone. They are honest and up front about it.

Now take all those things in your OP, and apply them to free trade. Doesn't everything said about Paul in your OP apply to free traders as well? How does supporting free trade help workers? Are the jobs safer when they are outsourced?

How many free traders do we have as front runners in our party? How many supported free trade when it was popular, then opposed it when it became unpopular? Do they really support workers or do they just support workers when the polls say it is ok to do so?

The dems will always be better then the pukes when it comes to workers rights. That is not good enough for me. I want a pro-worker party, not a better then the GOP party. One day we will have both (a pro-worker party that is better then the GOP) my friend.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I don't think it's quite the same thing, no.
Unfettered free trade; certainly a bad thing for people here and at the other end. Trade agreements with strong protections for workers are the antidote for that. I'm not happy with Clinton's signing onto the Peru agreement or her history on trade, but as I recall Edwards does not support it. but your right about his conversion. Still, I'll take conversion if it's sincere.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I am stuck on the authenticity my friend
I find his authenticity refreshing. I know where he stands and I appreciate that.

That being said, HRC will be the next president. No one can stop her. I just wish I could get behind her.

Anyway, I will support DK. I will vote my silly vote in NYS, confident that HRC will get my electoral vote.

And in 2009, things will be a bit better.

Peace and low stress...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-12-07 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC