Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Dog Won't Wag

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 10:36 AM
Original message
This Dog Won't Wag
Edited on Wed Feb-14-07 10:54 AM by dogday
Put aside completely the merits of starting a war with Iran, which is easy to do since there are none. Does the White House really believe that it can help itself politically by doing this? Do the people who have alienated this country and decimated another actually think that they can get away with this -- that the natural order would assert itself, and that the people would respond in the usual rallying way if the president went on prime-time television to announce the commencement of air strikes?

The two most recent polls I found on the question suggest a resounding no. There's a CNN poll from nearly a month ago that asks people about "military action" against Iran; 26 percent said they would favor it, and 68 percent said they'd oppose. There's also a more recent CBS survey that asked people to choose among "military action now," "diplomacy now," and "not a threat." Just 21 percent supported military action, while 57 percent backed diplomacy and 14 percent said Iran was not a threat (they're wrong, I think).

A population so disposed won't easily be flipped, especially by an administration with this track record. And it's numbers like these that have made me a skeptic on the Iran question. Any White House knows that you can't launch a war with numbers like that.

Indeed, this very White House faced skepticism about Iraq in early and mid 2002. Then commenced the marketing campaign of which Andy Card so famously spoke after Labor Day 2002: the television appearances, the ominous warnings about mushroom clouds, the Cincinnati speech, and the notorious sixteen words. Public opinion changed. Even this administration knew that it needed 50-percent-plus-one behind it before it could go into Iraq.



http://www.prospect.org/web/page.ww?section=root&name=ViewWeb&articleId=12456



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Harmonicaman Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. yes but...
what are the odds that a Gulf Of Tonkin-esque "incident may be considered as a way to bring about the "waverers"

never underestimate the desperation these people face, after all they have done and theres still a distinct lack of rapture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's the thing, people are expecting that
will happen, or this administration will claim an attack of some sort...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I agree
the level of skepticism is high enough that even if it were real, a provocation at a seemingly convenient time would backfire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Done Donating Member (680 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-14-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Besides the possibility of an "attack" blamed on Iran...
Shrub could also give a green light for Israel to attack Iran. This leads to an Iranian attack against US forces, or a preemptive US strike in anticipation of an Iranian attack against US forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC