Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Barbara Starr and the unruly elderly passenger flying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 05:58 AM
Original message
Barbara Starr and the unruly elderly passenger flying
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 05:59 AM by malaise
from LAX to Reagan.

Ms Star was sitting next to this large elderly woman who became hysterical during the flight...bla bla bla. Barbara and other passengers were in shock watching them try to restrain her. Eventually after her pleading, the two men agreed to sit on either side of the woman and move Barbara.
Carol died last week -this woman who barely spoke English nearly faced the same treatment. Maybe this poor woman just recognized Barbara and that was enough to set her off -maybe she was just going home to bury a close relative? Maybe she did have mental issues.

Are passengers paying good money for this kind of treatment? Will people with mental issues soon be labeled 'terrorists'?

WTF is going on in airports and on aircraft these days?

Barbara was relating this story a few minutes ago. I'm still in shock.

Add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. Will people with mental issues soon be labeled 'terrorists'?
And worse; remember the man, a US citizen from FL IIRC, who was shot dead by an undercover agent? I think his flight originated in South America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep
but there were some here defending that murder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cigsandcoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Well, what are you supposed to do with people freaking out on airplanes?
Ignore them? Require airlines to have psychiatric or alcohol interventionists on every flight?

The options are pretty limited, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Trained staff---safe interventions. America used to have a prevailing can-do attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cigsandcoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #6
17. Describe this safe intervention, if you would, when a person is out of control.
Bearing in mind that the plane is 30,000 feet in the air with no security staff on board, and only stressed and overworked flight attendents to handle the problem. I'm sure that safe interventions happen all the time in less extreme cases, and that the attendents do have some training in this regard. We're usually only going to hear about the ones that exceed normalcy or their ability to handle with soothing words.

I frankly don't see this as some kind of an indictment on America or our "can-do" attitude. That's a bizarre train of thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Your lack of imagination or faith in progress astounds me. We are spending billions
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 11:53 AM by terisan
in creating and continuing an unsafe, failing intervention in Iraq that has killed and displaced millions of people. I prefer to spend money on leadership, research and interventions that are sensible and safe, and allow as many people as possible to travel and lead a free life---as envisioned by our founders.

Start out with the premise that we want as many people as possible to exercise their right to travel while providing safe means of travel to all, including them. Take a couple of hundred million of those billions (or maybe some of the waste from the Boondoggle Department of Homeland Security). Draw together people who actually know and interact with unwell, and disabled individuals (professional, family members, and others); transportation execs and employees;law enforcement, self-advocates for disabled; and let them set the goals and parameters and come up with a workable process.


Too many people perhaps are gripped by fear and lacking in faith in our form of government, or maybe just aroused to fear by a manipulative leadership and their own anxieties to believe that we are capable of figuring out a safe means of transportation that respects the rights of all.

(Incidentally, stressed and overworked flight attendants shouldn't be working under those conditions because they themselves represent a risk. Are you doing anything to mitigate that risk or are you ignoring it and/or making excuses for it)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cigsandcoffee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. I'm sorry, but are you kidding me?
That's utterly ludicrous.

You want to create a government program to care for the small handful of mental health problems that occur once or twice a month on the tens of thousands of daily flights? Talk about an astounding waste of taxpayer money (and I don't care if it's being wasted elsewhere - that's hardly the point). Hell, we're lucky if police forces are trained to deal with the mentally ill, and now you want to move that job on to flight attendents with government financing behind it?

Get real.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terisan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. You want to keep wasting time on money on what doesn't work and go cut rate, go ahead.
Is a business and citizen study group a big government program? A big government program is the massive farm welfare bill (the agricultue giveaway) where the corporate farmers pick my pocket to support their millionaire lifestyles.

You are the one raising the issue of stressed and overworked flight attendents at 30000 feet and wanting to keep citizens who might breakdown from flying but you don't want to solve the problem in the proven method of getting stakeholders together to solve a problem?

Ask the stakeholders volunteer their time or make cost savings one of the objectives of the study.

I think too many Americans respond to problems , not as something to solve, but as emotional outlets, something to complain about ---and to address only by trying to roll back the rights of citizens.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Do you think people flying with mental health or other health issues
only started flying since 9/11?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. what will happen if people who want to make a statement opposing certain"homeland" security measures
were to stop, i mean, really STOP, flying on airplanes? Bush and his goons have let loose lots of roaches, goons and thugs and these have taken over the airlines .... there is so much crap going on these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. A one day boycott would shut down the country
business would suffer, the airlines would suffer and all parties would be forced to head for a table to sort out this fucking mess. Enough is fucking enough!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
12. i vote for boycott of the airlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Right, tens of thousands of us don't rely on the airlines for a living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
8. I fully support the beating, tasing, and restraining of authoritarians.
"9-11 changed everything" is bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:05 AM
Response to Original message
9. What about the "rights" of the OTHER PASSENGERS on the plane?
Getting sick of hearing that fat passengers have a "right" to spill over into my seat, parents have a "right" to allow their children to run amok, and now (apparently) people have a "right" to throw a fit at 37,000 feet.

What about the rights of the other 150 people on these flights?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. wrong spot
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 10:48 AM by Bluebear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindPilot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
10. It seems that this problem of people freaking out on planes and in airports
is happening a lot more frequently.

Perhaps if the airlines and the government didn't put quite so much effort into making sure that everyone is as uncomfortable, humiliated, frustrated and scared as they can possibly be before boarding the aircraft, there wouldn't be so many frightened angry passengers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Couldn't say it better
Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
26. It seems to be a reasonable possibility, doesn't it?
Edited on Mon Oct-08-07 08:06 PM by Gormy Cuss
Yet that perspective is not voiced in most media discussions of "air rage" events. There's also the long time idling in crowded terminals because the airlines and TSA recommend such early arrivals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. ITA. Airports are very stress inducing IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
28. Bingo! The stress level for airline passengers is already through the roof just trying to get on
a damn airplane.

Add in a few random factors like low blood suger (no meals on lots of flights), or pre-existing emotional difficulties, or any number of other stressors on TOP of the heightened stress of the "Terror! Terror! Terror!" gestalt of the whole system; and you have a sure-fire recipe for a certain percentage of freak-out.

sw

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
14. 'Maybe this poor woman just recognized Barbara and that was enough to set her off'
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. LOL
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. What happened to dicksteele's great response?
Anyone!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Is there anybody out there...
Hello... hello... hello... is there anybody IN there?... just nod if you can hear me... is there anyone at home? :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. It disappeared with the rest of that "I heart unthinking fascist brutality" subthread.
Not the first time that's happened. And until the Mods get a clue
and TOMBSTONE his trolling butt, it won't be the last.

A small price to pay, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-08-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. I hear yah bro
but your response was great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC