Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Video of Larry Craig caught in page sex/drugs scandal 25 yrs. ago!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:29 AM
Original message
Video of Larry Craig caught in page sex/drugs scandal 25 yrs. ago!
Edited on Tue Aug-28-07 04:30 AM by Philosoraptor
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

How salacious! How sordid! How republican!

--------------
Back in 1982, then-Rep. Craig (R-ID) came forward early in the congressional page sex scandal to deny any role in the scandal.

Reported ABC News' Carol Simpson at the time, "The names of congressman alleged to be involved in the scandal have remained secret. But Idaho Republican Congressman Larry Craig, concerned that his name had been implicated, issued a public denial." ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:46 AM
Response to Original message
1. The funny thing is
he did all that pre-emptively. I'm still trying to figure that whole thing out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And he was unmarried at the time.
Now of course he has a huge family, with huge family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. kids are all adopted? not that there's anything wrong with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Hey it takes a lot of work and $ to build up a credible "beard" story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. He's married?
Oh wow, he really is a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Yes, he's married and has kids. He had to make that family values
bullshit he spews look genuine....while all along he was trolling men's bathrooms for sex with men. And I won't bother to mention his voting record! Well, OKAY, I change my mind...

From ontheissues.org: Sen. Larry Craig

* Rated 100% by the Christian Coalition: a pro-family voting record. (Dec 2003)
* Voted NO on implementing the 9/11 Commission report. (Mar 2007)
* Voted NO on preserving habeus corpus for Guantanamo detainees. (Sep 2006)
* Voted NO on requiring CIA reports on detainees & interrogation methods. (Sep 2006)
* Voted YES on reauthorizing the PATRIOT Act. (Mar 2006)
* Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex basic training. (Jun 1998)
* Voted YES on confirming Samuel Alito as Supreme Court Justice. (Jan 2006)
* Voted YES on confirming John Roberts for Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. (Sep 2005)
* Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Apr 2007)
* Voted YES on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. (Jul 2006)
* Voted NO on $100M to reduce teen pregnancy by education & contraceptives. (Mar 2005)
* Voted YES on criminal penalty for harming unborn fetus during other crime. (Mar 2004)
* Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions except for maternal life. (Mar 2003)
* Voted YES on maintaining ban on Military Base Abortions. (Jun 2000)
* Voted YES on banning partial birth abortions. (Oct 1999)
* Voted YES on banning human cloning. (Feb 1998)
* Rated 0% by NARAL, indicating a pro-life voting record. (Dec 2003)
* Voted YES on recommending Constitutional ban on flag desecration. (Jun 2006)
* Voted YES on constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. (Jun 2006)
* Voted NO on adding sexual orientation to definition of hate crimes. (Jun 2002)
* Voted YES on loosening restrictions on cell phone wiretapping. (Oct 2001)
* Voted NO on expanding hate crimes to include sexual orientation. (Jun 2000)
* Voted NO on setting aside 10% of highway funds for minorities & women. (Mar 1998)
* Voted YES on ending special funding for minority & women-owned business. (Oct 1997)
* Voted YES on prohibiting same-sex marriage. (Sep 1996)
* Voted NO on prohibiting job discrimination by sexual orientation. (Sep 1996)
* Voted YES on Amendment to prohibit flag burning. (Dec 1995)
* Voted YES on banning affirmative action hiring with federal funds. (Jul 1995)
* Supports anti-flag desecration amendment. (Mar 2001)
* Rated 25% by the ACLU, indicating an anti-civil rights voting record. (Dec 2002)
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. Either that was a might big
guilt complex he was hiding or someone let him know they had the goods on him. Nothing ever came of it tho, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hell I don't know, just heard of it this morning.
Amazing all the sleazy shit in the GOP closet!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I watched both videos last night
but I haven't followed up to see what came of it. Something interesting to do when I'm bored later, lol :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. I love the article there
that talks about Romney pulling Craig's pro-Romney video down, lol. Yet another pig they have to distance themselves from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. any one doubt this now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. The unbelievable becomes believable over time, J. Edgar Hoover should know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. There maybe something to what you're saying, LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. dang
I never get to see Gannon's, uh... Scott Baker. Not that I would look or anything.

All these republican scandals about closeted self-hating men... why can't they see what their lies do to other people, if not themselves? Not to mention they become prime targets for blackmail.

Someone should make a group "My Space" page for closeted republicans... have pix of their friends... themselves... hobbies... Craig's could be "spending time cruising airport bathrooms," while, Ted Haggert's could be "buying meth but never snorting it" with his regularly scheduled male prostitute "down" time. All of their wives pix should have them in beards... LOL. anyone have the time for this? could you get sued for something like this if you had a big "parody" notice? It wouldn't even have to be their real wives, just pix of some 1950s females in helmet hair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Banned Discovery Channel Documentary now on Google Video:
Banned Discovery Channel Documentary now on Google Video
watch!
video.google.com — On Tuesday May 3, 1994 this program was scheduled to air on the Discovery Channel. Influential members of congress applied pressure to the cable industry to stop the airing of the program and destroy all copies. The Discovery Channel was reimbursed for the 1/4 to 1/2 million dollars production costs. This is the program they didn't want you to see!



http://digg.com/videos/people/Banned_Discovery_Channel_Documentary_now_on_Google_Video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
11. ................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
12. .................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. ..............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. ...............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youthere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-28-07 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
20. Let me guess, his denial went something like this....
"I had nothing to do with anything...but even if I did, I want to make sure you understand..I am not gay. Once again...not gay."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC