Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Y'know how states get their back up when people mention a standardization of voting?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 04:45 PM
Original message
Y'know how states get their back up when people mention a standardization of voting?
Think about this:

Right now there is a stampede to "be first" in holding primaries. The rationale is that they are doing it so their elections "count", and so that other states don't get the "jump" on them. The states apparently recognize on a micro-level, that what OTHER states do, really DOES matter to them, so the argument they use for not wanting nationally standardized formats is baseless.

They want it both ways..

EVERYONE cannot be "first"..


The time has come ..for a regional primary system..



Draw numbers from a box to see who goes "first", and leave it at that.

These primaries should be at 1 month intervals, to allow travel within the region.. Starting in february, it would all be over by July, and would be infinitely cheaper and easier to figure out..

I think our whole election system should be turned over to a 5th grade class somewhere.. Kids seem to get it, when it comes to doing things fairly and easily :")






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I suggested regional primaries a while back and also...
have the regions rotate each Presidential election. 2008: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 2012: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 1

It should reduce campaign costs for the primaries by reducing the transportation needed to get from one site to another. The media costs that can be shared across state lines because those other states are also in the region.

It might result in more viable candidates staying in longer if the payoff is still possible in the last 1 or 2 regions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep.. and my regional split has major media in each one
and large cities , as well as rural.. I think we'd get a much better accounting ..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-11-07 07:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I like the rotational aspect, I also like the 6 voting days, and primaries lasting until July
but I am not too keen on the regional portion of the plan. I would like to see the states divided in such a way that each region has at least one state voting on each primary day and the number of electoral votes divided nearly evenly between the primaries, with no declarable winner until all states have cast their votes. I am in Indiana and Kerry had already been declared the nominee before I even got to vote. I voted for him in the national election--but he was not my choice--I never believed that he was the one and only person who could beat * but I did hope that he was after he gained the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC